Form Studio AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 60.4% Better than the industry Industry: 5.1%
- Returns · return on assets 39.2% Better than the industry Industry: 9.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 31.2% About like the industry Industry: 37.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 4.68 Better than the industry Industry: 1.51
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
72of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 88 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 273 of 2,337 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 340 of 3,036 · Kultur og fritid
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 90 and resilience 51 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Form Studio AS is 21 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 2,334 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 60.4% (median 5.1%) and equity ratio 31.2% (median 37.0%).
Where it stands · 2025
We only have the accounts for 2025. The development shows once we have at least two years.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.8 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 935764254
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kultur og fritid (93.130)
- Purpose
- Drift av pilatesstudio, gruppetrening, personlig trening og salg av klær, utstyr og tilbehør relatert til trening, helse og livsstil.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.0 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 12 June 2025 1 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Halfdan Kjerulfs gate 4, 5017 BERGEN
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 9 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 27 June 2025
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Form Studio AS has a score of 72 for 2025, rank 340 of 3,036 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 90 against peers, operating margin 60.4% against a median of 5.1%. Liquidity: percentile 84 against peers, current ratio 4.68 against a median of 1.51.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 39 against peers, equity ratio 31.2% against a median of 37.0%.
Worth a closer look
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 1.4%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 90 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 39 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 84 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 57 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 60.4% | 5.1% |
| Profit margin | 60.0% | 4.3% |
| Return on assets | 39.2% | 9.8% |
| Equity ratio | 31.2% | 37.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 2.20 | 1.10 |
| Current ratio | 4.68 | 1.51 |
| Revenue growth | – | 5.7% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 72, Form Studio AS does better than 88% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,337 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
10 days | 22 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
38 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
0.2% | −7.7% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
78.4% | 64.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
105.7 | 5.5 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.5% | 0.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 24.8% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.0 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
97.1% | 19.0% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
45.9% | 15.4% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
46.9% | 3.4% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
0.65 | 1.91 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
3.20 | 2.09 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
– | −0.5 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
– | 1.19 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
3.88 | 1.39 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
21.9% | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
– | 2.1 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
2.5% | 31.8% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
96.0% | 28.9% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 18 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 46.9% × asset turnover 0.65 × multiplier 3.20 = 97.1% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Form Studio AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 60.4% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 60.4% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: sports and recreation (indeks)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: sports and recreation, annual average | 84.2 | 89.2 | 94.0 | 98.8 | 105.5 | 112.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +2.0% | +6.0% | +5.4% | +5.2% | +6.7% | +6.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | 60.4% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Form Studio AS had an operating margin of 60.4% and an equity ratio of 31.2% in 2025, and ranks 340 of 3,036 in Kultur og fritid.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 9 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The methods differ widely (the highest is 8.4 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 290,000 NOK per share, on 30 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 2 MNOK and 14 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 21.1 | 10 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.9 | 14 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.3 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 20 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 13 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 14 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Recreation.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
- The chair is under 60.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 0 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Form Studio AS?
The operating margin was 60.4% in 2025, against a median of 5.1% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 39.2%.
How solid is Form Studio AS?
The equity ratio was 31.2% in 2025 (median 37.0%). Debt-to-equity was 2.20 (median 1.10).
What is the liquidity of Form Studio AS like?
The current ratio was 4.68 in 2025 (median 1.51).
How does Form Studio AS compare in Kultur og fritid?
Form Studio AS ranks 340 of 3,036 in Kultur og fritid for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 273 of 2,337.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varden Gym AS |  Lion |
2 MNOK | 26.3% | 79 |
| Flexi Trening AS |  Beaver |
2 MNOK | −1.1% | 32 |
| Form Studio AS (this company) | Lion |
2 MNOK | 60.4% | 72 |
| Fit for Fight Norge AS |  Cheetah |
2 MNOK | 4.6% | 44 |
| Tidforyoga AS · same municipality | Lion |
2 MNOK | 4.3% | 61 |
| Feelgood Øst AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 10.5% | 71 |
| Fosen Trenings- og Kampsportsenter AS | Cheetah |
2 MNOK | 29.5% | 48 |
| Aktiv Risør AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 49.7% | 87 |
| Fitnesspoint Askim AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 8.0% | 66 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Silje Stenersen Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Silje Stenersen Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Kultur og fritid (2 companies) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Silje Stenersen Holding AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Form Studio AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Silje Stenersen Holding AS
- Form Studio AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Silje Stenersen Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Silje Stenersen Holding AS (holds 100%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Silje Stenersen Holding AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year
Trends appear once there is more than one fiscal year.
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.8 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6726166.
Further
Similar companies
- Kulturkarusellen AS index 72, rank 337 · compare
- Styrk Trening og Kaffebar AS index 72, rank 338 · compare
- Mannakorn AS index 72, rank 339 · compare
- Liholm AS index 72, rank 341 · compare
- Oldervik Countryfestival AS index 72, rank 342 · compare