Systema AS

Org. no. 936809219 · Oslo · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2025 11.1 MNOK Small
Net profit · 2025 0.1 MNOK
Equity · 2025 6.8 MNOK
Founded 1985 41 years in operation
Quick check · fiscal year 2025

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin 1.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 5.3%
  • Returns · return on assets 1.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 9.9%
  • Solidity · equity ratio 79.4% Better than the industry Industry: 34.5%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 4.70 Better than the industry Industry: 1.34
  • Growth · revenue growth −23.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.7%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2025

53of 100

How to read this: the company is ahead of 56 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?

Rank in the Morning class Small: 678 of 1,532 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,231 of 7,318 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon

Profile

Elephant · Steward

Lower profitability, high resilience

Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 31 and resilience 86 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology

Against the sector

Systema AS is 2 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.

Median score 51 among 1,531 companies.

Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 1.1% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio 79.4% (median 34.5%).

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 9 November 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue fell by 40 % from 2023 to 2025, to 11.1 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 3.3% in 2023 to 1.1% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 65.5% in 2023 to 79.4% in 2025.

Score · 2025 53 −8 points since 2023 (weaker)
Operating revenue · 2025 11.1 MNOK −40% since 2023 (weaker)
Net profit · 2025 0.1 MNOK −78% since 2023 (weaker)
Operating margin · 2025 1.1% −2.1 pp since 2023 (weaker)
Equity ratio · 2025 79.4% +13.9 pp since 2023 (better)
Current ratio · 2025 4.70 +1.82 since 2023 (better)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue18.5 MNOK14.4 MNOK11.1 MNOK
Operating profit0.6 MNOK−1.2 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Net profit0.4 MNOK−1.0 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Total assets11.7 MNOK8.8 MNOK8.6 MNOK
Equity7.7 MNOK6.7 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Total liabilities4.0 MNOK2.1 MNOK1.8 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
936809219
Legal form
AS
Sector
Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
Purpose
Å yte EDB-tjenester, forhandle EDB-programmer og utstyr, samt deltagelse i andre selskaper.
Morning company class
Small
Employees
0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 7.1 MNOK (2025).
Founded
15 February 1985 41 years in operation
Share capital
0.55 MNOK
Business address
c/o Epicenter, Edvard Storms gate 2, 0166 OSLO
Municipality
Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
The company's business municipality, Oslo. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Summary analysis

Systema AS has a score of 53 for 2025, rank 3,231 of 7,318 in the sector.

Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 96 against peers, current ratio 4.70 against a median of 1.34. Solidity: percentile 94 against peers, equity ratio 79.4% against a median of 34.5%.

Weakest: Profitability: percentile 31 against peers, operating margin 1.1% against a median of 5.3%.

Worth a closer look

Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made

Indications · 2025

Worth a closer look

No rules were triggered for this year.

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

No anomalies found in the figures.

Stress test · 2026

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Components · 2025

What the score is made of

Profitability31 weight 40%
Solidity94 weight 20%
Liquidity96 weight 5%
Growth44 weight 25%
Consistency65 weight 10%

Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?

Durability: 51 (average over 3 years)

Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.

Key figures · 2025

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue11 MNOK20 MNOK
Operating margin 1.1% 5.3% 33 %
Profit margin 1.1% 5.5% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets 1.5% 9.9% 29 %
Equity ratio 79.4% 34.5% 94 %
Debt-to-equity 0.26 1.61 94 %
Current ratio 4.70 1.34 96 %
Revenue growth −23.1% 7.7% 7 %

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

With an index of 53, Systema AS does better than 56% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,532 companies) in 2025.

Over time

Score 2023–2025

CompanyMedian0255075100202320242025
  • Systema AS
  • Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt · 2025

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
34 days 73 days 18 %
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
0 days 0 days 33 %
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
−6.7% −7.8% 53 %
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
87.7% 43.2% 94 %
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
34.2 7.9 66 %
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
0.2% 1.2% 24 %
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
– 13.9% not compared

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.7 MNOK.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

The industry or the company: what drove the result?

In 2025 the operating margin of Systema AS rose by 9.7 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 9.4 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.

Over 2 year-to-year changes Systema AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 2% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.

The operating margin of Systema AS against comparable companies, year by year
YearThe companyComparable (median) Change, companyChange, industryThe company's own
2024−8.6%5.0% −11.8 percentage points +0.1 percentage points −12.0 percentage points
20251.1%5.3% +9.7 percentage points +0.3 percentage points +9.4 percentage points

Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.

The company and its sector's drivers

Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Systema AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.

Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))

Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

Service prices: information and communication per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Service prices: information and communication, annual average100.0103.3108.7112.2116.7120.0 (so far)
Change from the year before–+3.2%+5.3%+3.2%+4.0%+2.8%
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source

Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))

Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

Turnover index: information and communication per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Turnover index: information and communication, annual average99.6111.4126.4128.3134.2141.3 (so far)
Change from the year before+14.7%+11.8%+13.5%+1.5%+4.6%+5.3%
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source

USD/NOK (kr)

USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

USD/NOK per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
USD/NOK, annual average8.599.6110.5610.7510.399.54 (so far)
Change from the year before−8.8%+11.9%+9.9%+1.7%−3.3%−8.2%
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Policy rate (prosent)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0103.0 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+3.0%
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source

Wage index: IT services (indeks)

Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Systema AS rose 9.7 percentage points.

Wage index: IT services per year and the operating margin of Systema AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Wage index: IT services, annual average84.987.892.397.3101.5105.4 (so far)
Change from the year before+4.9%+3.5%+5.1%+5.4%+4.4%+3.8%
The company's operating margin––3.3%−8.6%1.1%–

Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

Analysis · 2025

What the numbers say

Systema AS had an operating margin of 1.1% and an equity ratio of 79.4% in 2025, and ranks 3,231 of 7,318 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.

From 2024 to 2025: went from a loss to a profit before tax and the operating margin rose from −8.6% to 1.1%.

This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.

Estimated value · 2025

Three simple methods

One method gives a figure: 15 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2025): −0.2 MNOK 18.0 – not meaningful
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2025): −0.2 MNOK 14.9 – not meaningful
P/B Equity: 6.8 MNOK 3.6 24 MNOK 15 MNOK

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

2025

Questions and answers

How profitable is Systema AS?

The operating margin was 1.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.5%.

How solid is Systema AS?

The equity ratio was 79.4% in 2025 (median 34.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.26 (median 1.61).

What is the liquidity of Systema AS like?

The current ratio was 4.70 in 2025 (median 1.34).

How does Systema AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?

Systema AS ranks 3,231 of 7,318 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 678 of 1,532. Revenue changed by −23.1% from the year before.

2025

Competitors

The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.

Mog Automasjon AS: 93 / 23Selvklart AS: 21 / 23Detec AS: 35 / 65Systema AS: 31 / 86BARN - Nett AS: 43 / 76Avinto AS: 75 / 33Birdsview AS: 60 / 78BK Oncode AS: 46 / 9Nshift Solutions AS: 50 / 1900252550507575100100Resilience, percentile against peers →↑ Profitability, percentile against peers

CompanyProfileOperating revenueOperating marginScore
Mog Automasjon AS Cheetah 12 MNOK 29.1% 55
Selvklart AS Beaver 12 MNOK −2.0% 30
Detec AS Elephant 11 MNOK 2.3% 56
Systema AS (this company) Elephant 11 MNOK 1.1% 53
BARN - Nett AS Elephant 11 MNOK 1.3% 56
Avinto AS · same municipality Cheetah 11 MNOK 7.0% 63
Birdsview AS Lion 11 MNOK 13.4% 75
BK Oncode AS Beaver 11 MNOK 4.8% 38
Nshift Solutions AS · same municipality Beaver 11 MNOK 4.1% 30

The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
1 (one owner)
Largest owner
100.0%
Split
companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 100%
Group chain
Ultimate owner: Wisetech Global Trading Pty LTD
  • Wisetech Global Trading Pty LTD (Australia) · 100.0%

Change 2007–2025: 100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 1 departed owners). The majority owner changed. Foreign owners now hold more than half.
New owners (companies): Wisetech Global Trading Pty LTD
Departed (companies): Rodama Holding AS

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index613953
Rank2,0365,0503,231
Operating margin3.3%−8.6%1.1%
Return on assets5.1%−14.1%1.5%
Equity ratio65.5%76.3%79.4%
Current ratio2.884.054.70
Revenue growth–−22.2%−23.1%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue18.5 MNOK14.4 MNOK11.1 MNOK
Operating profit0.6 MNOK−1.2 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Profit before tax0.5 MNOK−1.2 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Tax expense0.1 MNOK−0.3 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Net profit0.4 MNOK−1.0 MNOK0.1 MNOK
Financial expenses0.1 MNOK0.0 MNOK0.0 MNOK
Total assets11.7 MNOK8.8 MNOK8.6 MNOK
Current assets11.6 MNOK8.4 MNOK8.3 MNOK
Equity7.7 MNOK6.7 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Retained earnings7.1 MNOK6.1 MNOK6.2 MNOK
Total liabilities4.0 MNOK2.1 MNOK1.8 MNOK
Current liabilities4.0 MNOK2.1 MNOK1.8 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6339357.

News and announcements

From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link