Solid Innredning AS
Score · fiscal year 2024
45of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 38 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 1,138 of 1,845 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,170 of 5,179 · Industri
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 30 and resilience 60 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Solid Innredning AS is 6 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 51 among 1,845 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2024: operating margin 1.0% (median 4.6%) and equity ratio 57.8% (median 41.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 12 MNOK | 22 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 1.0% | 4.6% |
| Profit margin | 1.4% | 4.3% |
| Return on assets | 2.9% | 9.9% |
| Equity ratio | 57.8% | 41.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.73 | 1.31 |
| Current ratio | 2.16 | 1.75 |
| Revenue growth | 15.2% | 4.4% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.19 MNOK | 1.71 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 45, Solid Innredning AS does better than 38% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,845 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Solid Innredning AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
What the numbers say
Solid Innredning AS had an operating margin of 1.0% and an equity ratio of 57.8% in 2024, and ranks 3,170 of 5,179 in Industri.
From 2023 to 2024: the equity ratio fell from 74.9% to 57.8% and the operating margin fell from 5.4% to 1.0%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 4 MNOK and 8 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.2 | 4 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 18.6 | 8 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.0 | 6 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 6 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 4 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −4 MNOK |
| Equity value | 8 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −93% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Machinery, Food Processing, Chemical (Specialty), Building Materials, Packaging & Container.
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.1% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 30 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 72 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 65 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 48 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 36 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 55 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Solid Innredning AS?
The operating margin was 1.0% in 2024, against a median of 4.6% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 2.9%.
How solid is Solid Innredning AS?
The equity ratio was 57.8% in 2024 (median 41.7%). Debt-to-equity was 0.73 (median 1.31).
What is the liquidity of Solid Innredning AS like?
The current ratio was 2.16 in 2024 (median 1.75).
How does Solid Innredning AS compare in Industri?
Solid Innredning AS ranks 3,170 of 5,179 in Industri for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 1,138 of 1,845. Revenue changed by 15.2% from the year before.
Group structure · 2025
15 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in O. C. Bentzen AS. Persons are not shown by name.
O. C. Bentzen AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company), Eiendom (4 companies), Industri (1 company) 6 of 15 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 45 in all. Trondheim 35, Malvik 10 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Helmer Lundgreens Gate 2 AS
- Loss
- 2 companies: Solid Innredning AS, Helmer Lundgreens Gate 2 AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
O. C. Bentzen AS
- Solid Innredning AS you are here
- Systor Trondheim AS
- Systor International AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 944218238
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Industri (31.000)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 10 registered 10 February 2026
- Founded
- 1 July 1987 39 years in operation
- Share capital
- 2.49 MNOK
- Business address
- Stavsjøvegen 26, 7550 HOMMELVIK (MALVIK)
- Municipality
- Malvik rank 13–22 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: O. C. Bentzen AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- O. C. Bentzen AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 4 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): O. C. Bentzen AS
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 5 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 65 | 45 | 33 | |
| Rank | 1,341 | 3,170 | 4,197 | |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 1.0% | −1.5% | |
| Return on assets | 9.9% | 2.9% | −2.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 74.9% | 57.8% | 53.2% | |
| Current ratio | 3.53 | 2.16 | 1.75 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 15.2% | −4.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10.4 MNOK | 11.9 MNOK | 11.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.6 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.6 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.4 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 5.7 MNOK | 5.8 MNOK | 6.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 5.0 MNOK | 5.3 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 4.2 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.7 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 5 November 2026, accounts id 6039501.
Further
Similar companies
- Tiller Pizza AS index 45, rank 3,164 · compare
- Allstein AS index 45, rank 3,165 · compare
- Moelv Mekaniske Verksted AS index 45, rank 3,169 · compare
- Rissa Betong AS index 45, rank 3,171 · compare
- Kis Maritime AS index 45, rank 3,172 · compare