Markus AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin −31.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
- Returns · return on assets 14.7% Better than the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 96.6% Better than the industry Industry: 27.9%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.66 About like the industry Industry: 1.40
- Growth · revenue growth −3.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 3.3%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
56of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 64 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 8,662 of 23,899 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 10,865 of 30,124 · Eiendom
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 41 and resilience 80 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Markus AS is 6 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,893 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −31.2% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 96.6% (median 27.9%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 16 % from 2023 to 2025, to 1.4 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −37.0% in 2023 to −31.2% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 94.7% in 2023 to 96.6% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.2 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | −0.6 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.3 MNOK | −2.4 MNOK | −2.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 13.9 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK | 8.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 13.2 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 8.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 950783346
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Handelsvirksomhet. Selskapet kan videre eie og drive fast eiendom og gjøre seg interessert i annen virksomhet ved aksjeerverv eller annen tilsvarende eierposisjon.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.8 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 9 December 1988 37 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.05 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o iFront Økonomi AS, Elvarheimgata 10B, 2408 ELVERUM
- Municipality
- Elverum rank 25 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 2 October 2018
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Former names
- Mafi AS until 2016, AS MARKUS until 2001
- LEI
- 549300IF6X6J95YSGL48 renews 14 March 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Markus AS has a score of 56 for 2025, rank 10,865 of 30,124 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 97 against peers, equity ratio 96.6% against a median of 27.9%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −0.1 (median 1.8); financial costs as a share of debt 1,432.6% (median 5.0%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −201.6% (median 24.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −31.2% (median 47.7%).
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 9.6 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +10.3, the industry +0.7 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −0.1 (median 1.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 1,432.6% (median 5.0%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −201.6% (median 24.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −31.2% (median 47.7%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 200 days (median 40 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1,432.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 41 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 97 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 55 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 47 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 57 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 62 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −31.2% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | −201.6% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 14.7% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 96.6% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.03 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 1.66 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | −3.2% | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 56, Markus AS does better than 64% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,899 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Markus AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
200 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
1 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
34.8% | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
−64.2% | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−0.1 | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1,432.6% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 87.8% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 4.1 MNOK, 0.2 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
−26.4% | 12.0% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
−5.4% | 7.8% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
−175.6% | 19.5% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
0.17 | 0.16 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
1.03 | 3.09 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
– | 6.9 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
– | 1.01 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
1.64 | 1.24 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
– | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
– | 1.4 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
60.2% | 12.5% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
– | 81.7% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 10 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin −175.6% × asset turnover 0.17 × multiplier 1.03 = −30.4% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The operating result is not positive, so net debt over operating result and the safety margin are not calculated.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Markus AS rose by 10.3 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 9.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Markus AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 10% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −41.6% | 46.9% | −4.5 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | −5.4 percentage points |
| 2025 | −31.2% | 47.7% | +10.3 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +9.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Markus AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Markus AS rose 10.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Markus AS rose 10.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Markus AS rose 10.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Markus AS rose 10.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Markus AS rose 10.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Markus AS had an operating margin of −31.2% and an equity ratio of 96.6% in 2025, and ranks 10,865 of 30,124 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −41.6% to −31.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 4 MNOK
The mean of the 1 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. Fewer than three methods gave a figure, so the mean is weaker than it looks.
That is about 475 NOK per share, on 7,375 shares in the shareholder register.
One method gives a figure: 4 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 0.7 | 4 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Implied dividend (net payout)
- Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- Several signs that a generation change may be coming.
- 75% of the shares held by persons are held by people aged 60 or older.
- The chair is 60 or older.
- The managing director is 60 or older.
- 1 of 2 on the board are 60 or older.
- What the largest owner can do alone
- The largest owner holds 70.1% of the shares, at least two thirds. The owner can alone secure decisions that need a two-thirds majority, such as changes to the articles (Companies Act § 5-18), and all decisions by ordinary majority (§ 5-17).
The owner is a private person.
Applies to the largest single owner in the shareholder register (2025). The articles can limit voting rights and owners can vote together, and we cannot see either. Ownership through other companies is not counted. - Board and managing director as owners
- 2 of the 2 who sit on the board or are managing director hold shares directly, together at least 95.1% of the shares.
A combined figure with no names. The people are found by the same birth year and the same words in the name in the company's owner list (2025). Someone who owns through a holding company, or is entered under another name, is not found, so the figure is a lower bound and does not say the others own nothing.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Markus AS?
The operating margin was −31.2% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 14.7%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Markus AS?
The equity ratio was 96.6% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.03 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Markus AS like?
The current ratio was 1.66 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does Markus AS compare in Eiendom?
Markus AS ranks 10,865 of 30,124 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 8,662 of 23,899. Revenue changed by −3.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebell Eiendom AS |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | 37.7% | 50 |
| Wirgenes Vei 5B AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 49.8% | 49 |
| Myrvang Eiendom AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 2.8% | 31 |
| Snøhetta Næringspark AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 42.5% | 59 |
| Evida Eiendom AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 55.7% | 47 |
| Markus AS (this company) | Elephant |
1 MNOK | −31.2% | 56 |
| Heum Eiendom AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −10.2% | 17 |
| Eiendomsselskapet Åsaveien 72 AS | Lion |
1 MNOK | 82.5% | 68 |
| Stemmane 13 Eiendom AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 78.4% | 47 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 70% of the shares in Markus AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Markus AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (1 company) 1 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Markus AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Markus AS you are here
-
Org. no. 925734195
- Org. no. 930496057
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 3 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 70.1%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Owners over 60
- 75% of the shares held by persons (median age 67)
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
Change 2007–2025: 25% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 0 departed owners).
Holds shares in: Terningen Invest AS (1%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 69 | 61 | 56 | |
| Rank | 4,800 | 7,046 | 10,865 | |
| Operating margin | −37.0% | −41.6% | −31.2% | |
| Return on assets | 23.1% | 35.4% | 14.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 94.7% | 95.0% | 96.6% | |
| Current ratio | 8.09 | 5.15 | 1.66 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 19.6% | −3.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.2 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | −0.6 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −2.0 MNOK | −2.3 MNOK | −2.8 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.8 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.3 MNOK | −2.4 MNOK | −2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 5.2 MNOK | 6.3 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 13.9 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK | 8.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 6.0 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 13.2 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 8.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 12.1 MNOK | 9.9 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6634373.
Further
Similar companies
- Lerstadveien 539 AS index 56, rank 10,862 · compare
- Eiksenteret Eiendom AS index 56, rank 10,866 · compare
- Spikkestad Torg 1 AS index 56, rank 10,867 · compare
- Evenrødveien Eiendom AS index 56, rank 10,868 · compare
- Elvevegen 13 AS index 56, rank 10,869 · compare
News and announcements
- 27 October 2026 Gjennomføring av fusjon (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene · important
- 12 September 2026 Fusjonsbeslutning (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene · important
- 25 October 2025 Endring i styret (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene
From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link