Voss Bil Eigedom AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
40of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 28 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 17,105 of 23,906 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 21,703 of 30,136 · Eiendom
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 40 and resilience 59 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Voss Bil Eigedom AS is 10 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,900 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −21.2% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 40.9% (median 27.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −21.2% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | 183.5% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 13.7% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 40.9% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.44 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | −22.3% | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 40, Voss Bil Eigedom AS does better than 28% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,906 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Voss Bil Eigedom AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
1,498 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
222 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
65.9% | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
1.1% | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−0.7 | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.1% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
55.8% | 87.8% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 1.6 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.7 MNOK, 0.7 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Voss Bil Eigedom AS has a score of 40 for 2025, rank 21,703 of 30,136 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 64 against peers. Solidity: percentile 60 against peers, equity ratio 40.9% against a median of 27.9%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 15 against peers, revenue growth −22.3% against a median of 3.3%. Profitability: percentile 40 against peers, operating margin −21.2% against a median of 47.7%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −0.7 (median 1.8); financial costs as a share of debt 3.1% (median 5.0%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −21.2% (median 47.7%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 1,498 days (median 40 days).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell by 8.8 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.8 points. So the company did 9.5 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Voss Bil Eigedom AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 13% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −12.5% | 46.9% | +2.0 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +1.1 percentage points |
| 2025 | −21.2% | 47.7% | −8.8 percentage points | +0.8 percentage points | −9.5 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Voss Bil Eigedom AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Voss Bil Eigedom AS had an operating margin of −21.2% and an equity ratio of 40.9% in 2025, and ranks 21,703 of 30,136 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a loss to a profit before tax and the operating margin fell from −12.5% to −21.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 7 MNOK and 18 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | 18 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 0.7 | 7 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −0.7 (median 1.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.1% (median 5.0%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −21.2% (median 47.7%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 1,498 days (median 40 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 40 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 60 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 45 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 15 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 64 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 41 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Voss Bil Eigedom AS?
The operating margin was −21.2% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 13.7%.
How solid is Voss Bil Eigedom AS?
The equity ratio was 40.9% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 1.44 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Voss Bil Eigedom AS like?
The current ratio was 1.18 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does Voss Bil Eigedom AS compare in Eiendom?
Voss Bil Eigedom AS ranks 21,703 of 30,136 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 17,105 of 23,906. Revenue changed by −22.3% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kif Idrettssenter AS |  Lion |
2 MNOK | 68.6% | 73 |
| Lønningshaugen-3 AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 56.9% | 64 |
| Brødrene Heggdal AS |  Elephant |
2 MNOK | 1.8% | 33 |
| Jåbekk Industribygg AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 75.7% | 58 |
| Kartra Eiendom AS | Elephant |
2 MNOK | 11.1% | 48 |
| Voss Bil Eigedom AS (this company) | Elephant |
2 MNOK | −21.2% | 40 |
| Kåsvegen 11B AS |  Cheetah |
2 MNOK | 71.5% | 49 |
| Vetrlidsalmenning AS |  Beaver |
2 MNOK | −48.6% | 13 |
| Røyken Butikkeiendom AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 71.1% | 65 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
10 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Voss Bil Eigedom AS.
Voss Bil Eigedom AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Annen tjenesteyting (5 companies), Handel (2 companies), Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (1 company), Eiendom (2 companies) 10 of 10 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 66 in all. Voss 66 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 3 companies: Biltunet Utleige AS, Voss Bilsenter AS, Bilpleiesenteret Voss AS
- Loss
- 4 companies: Biltunet Utleige AS, Voss Bil AS, Voss Bilsenter AS, Bilpleiesenteret Voss AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 3 companies joined the group: Voss Bilsenter AS, Bilskadesenteret Voss AS, Bilpleiesenteret Voss AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 953445697
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 17 October 1989 37 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.70 MNOK
- Business address
- Storrviki 2, 5710 SKULESTADMO (VOSS)
- Municipality
- Voss rank 1–16 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Langeland Auto AS · 50.0%
- Torgils Klette Bil AS · 50.0%
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
Majority owner of: Biltunet Holding AS (100%), Voss Bil Lastebil AS (100%), Voss Trafikksenter AS (100%), Voss Bil AS (100%)
The portfolio: 5 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 4 of them as majority owner. The average index is 43. 0 have negative equity and 1 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Nekkar ASA (0%), Gjensidige Forsikring ASA (0%), Voss Bil AS (100%), Biltunet Holding AS (100%), Voss Veksel- og Landmandsbank ASA (0%), Voss Bil Lastebil AS (100%), Voss Trafikksenter AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 50 | 34 | 40 | |
| Rank | 13,487 | 23,388 | 21,703 | |
| Operating margin | −14.5% | −12.5% | −21.2% | |
| Return on assets | 15.6% | 1.9% | 13.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 34.4% | 40.4% | 40.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.89 | 0.74 | 1.18 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −3.1% | −22.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.2 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 3.9 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 4.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 29.7 MNOK | 26.6 MNOK | 37.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 8.7 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK | 11.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 10.2 MNOK | 10.7 MNOK | 15.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 7.9 MNOK | 7.8 MNOK | 12.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 19.5 MNOK | 15.9 MNOK | 21.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 9.9 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK | 9.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6924260.
Further
Similar companies
- Pangaea Eiendom AS index 40, rank 21,700 · compare
- COOP Vikeså Eiendom AS index 40, rank 21,701 · compare
- Bølevegen 131 AS index 40, rank 21,702 · compare
- Reidar Toft AS index 40, rank 21,705 · compare
- Øvre Langgate 63 AS index 40, rank 21,706 · compare