ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
27of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 13 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 4,825 of 5,567 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 17,343 of 20,428 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 2 and solidity 55 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS is 24 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 5,567 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −17.2% (median 4.5%) and equity ratio 38.4% (median 34.2%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 49 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −17.2% | 4.5% |
| Profit margin | −17.0% | 4.3% |
| Return on assets | −44.2% | 11.0% |
| Equity ratio | 38.4% | 34.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.60 | 1.72 |
| Current ratio | 1.57 | 1.48 |
| Revenue growth | −24.4% | 6.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 27, ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS does better than 13% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (5,567 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS has a score of 27 for 2025, rank 17,343 of 20,428 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 55 against peers, current ratio 1.57 against a median of 1.48.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 2 against peers, operating margin −17.2% against a median of 4.5%. Growth: percentile 9 against peers, revenue growth −24.4% against a median of 6.0%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −17.0% (median 4.3%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −17.2% (median 4.5%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS had an operating margin of −17.2% and an equity ratio of 38.4% in 2025, and ranks 17,343 of 20,428 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a profit to a loss before tax and the equity ratio fell from 87.6% to 38.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 7 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 7 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −17.0% (median 4.3%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −17.2% (median 4.5%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 1.8%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 2 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 55 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 55 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 9 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 22 | weight 15% |
Durability: 61 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS?
The operating margin was −17.2% in 2025, against a median of 4.5% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was −44.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS?
The equity ratio was 38.4% in 2025 (median 34.2%). Debt-to-equity was 1.60 (median 1.72).
What is the liquidity of ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS like?
The current ratio was 1.57 in 2025 (median 1.48).
How does ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
ROBERT RUUD BYGG AS ranks 17,343 of 20,428 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 4,825 of 5,567. Revenue changed by −24.4% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 963030258
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (43.320)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 September 1991 35 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Molland 25, 4887 GRIMSTAD
- Municipality
- Grimstad rank 7–18 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Robert Willy Ruud
- Chair of the board
- Robert Willy Ruud
- Deputy member
- Åse Mortensen
- Auditor
- AGDER-TEAM REVISJON AS
- Accountant
- MP REGNSKAP AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 28 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 84 | 72 | 27 | |
| Rank | 1,052 | 2,490 | 17,343 | |
| Operating margin | 9.3% | 0.0% | −17.2% | |
| Return on assets | 17.3% | 2.0% | −44.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 69.9% | 87.6% | 38.4% | |
| Current ratio | 3.29 | 7.67 | 1.57 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 65.0% | −24.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 39.1 MNOK | 64.5 MNOK | 48.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 3.6 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | −8.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 3.7 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | −8.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | 2.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | −8.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 21.6 MNOK | 17.5 MNOK | 18.7 MNOK |
| Current assets | 21.4 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK | 18.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 15.1 MNOK | 15.3 MNOK | 7.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 12.4 MNOK | 12.6 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 6.5 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 11.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 6.5 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 11.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 28 October 2026, accounts id 7179047.
Further
Similar companies
- PB TRE AS index 27, rank 17,340 · compare
- LIER GRAVING OG TRANSPORT AS index 27, rank 17,341 · compare
- SN STÅLBYGG AS index 27, rank 17,342 · compare
- SOGN SERVICE DRIFT AS index 27, rank 17,346 · compare
- MELHUSEN&MOE AS index 27, rank 17,348 · compare