Navsys AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2023
49of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 48 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 2,240 of 4,300 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,440 of 6,515 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 18 and resilience 84 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
Navsys AS is 1 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 50 among 4,298 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023: operating margin −13.7% (median 6.0%) and equity ratio 76.4% (median 40.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −13.7% | 6.0% |
| Profit margin | −13.7% | 6.3% |
| Return on assets | −11.2% | 11.4% |
| Equity ratio | 76.4% | 40.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Current ratio | 3.86 | 1.57 |
| Revenue growth | – | 0.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 49, Navsys AS does better than 48% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,300 companies) in 2023.
Score 2023–2025
- Navsys AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
142 days | 55 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
115 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
43.7% | −8.6% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
31.7% | 55.3% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−14.1 | 8.1 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.6% | 0.5% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 0.0% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 1.6 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
What the numbers say
Navsys AS had an operating margin of −13.7% and an equity ratio of 76.4% in 2023, and ranks 3,440 of 6,515 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 7 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 7 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −14.1 (median 8.1); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.6% (median 0.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −13.7% (median 6.3%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −13.7% (median 6.0%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 142 days (median 55 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.6% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 18 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 82 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 83 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 88 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Navsys AS?
The operating margin was −13.7% in 2023, against a median of 6.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −11.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Navsys AS?
The equity ratio was 76.4% in 2023 (median 40.4%). Debt-to-equity was 0.31 (median 1.10).
What is the liquidity of Navsys AS like?
The current ratio was 3.86 in 2023 (median 1.57).
How does Navsys AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Navsys AS ranks 3,440 of 6,515 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2023. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 2,240 of 4,300.
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 1
- Total awarded value since 2024
- value not stated
- Framework agreements
- 1
- Left out of the total: the value is a ceiling, not actual spend.
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 July 2024 | Domstoladministrasjonen | GNSS-Utstyr til Domstoladministrasjonen | value not stated |
| 30 May 2021 | NTNU | LiDAR-sensor | 1.6 MNOK |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Dependence on public contracts
Awarded value in the year seen against revenue the same year. This is not a share of revenue: the value is the whole contract, often for several years, and it does not necessarily become revenue that year.
| Year | Contracts | Awarded value | Awarded value against revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | not stated | – |
Framework agreements are left out (1 since 2024). A ceiling is not a purchase.
Largest public buyers since 2024
| Buyer | Contracts | Value | Share of value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domstoladministrasjonen | 1 | not stated | – |
Key contracts
The largest contracts by awarded value, framework agreements excluded.
| Date | Buyer | Contract | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 May 2021 | NTNU | LiDAR-sensor | 1.6 MNOK |
- The value is the whole contract as stated by the buyer, often for several years.
- Framework agreements are left out of the sums, since the value is a ceiling. Many frameworks are not marked in Doffin and may still be included.
- Only awards where Doffin gives the company's organisation number.
- Contracts without a stated value are counted but not summed.
- An indication of dependence, not an accounting figure. End dates are rarely in the Doffin data.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 27 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 963828098
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 April 1992 34 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Solskjermingsgruppen Ringfoss, Ole Deviks vei 38, 0668 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.navsys.no
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 75.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
Change 2007–2025: 50% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 1 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 49 | 82 | 34 | |
| Rank | 3,440 | 142 | 5,894 | |
| Operating margin | −13.7% | 23.6% | −52.0% | |
| Return on assets | −11.2% | 32.5% | −14.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 76.4% | 63.1% | 89.6% | |
| Current ratio | 3.86 | 2.71 | 9.63 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 203.3% | −84.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.7 MNOK | 11.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.5 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.5 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK | −0.8 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.4 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK | −0.8 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.2 MNOK | 8.2 MNOK | 5.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.8 MNOK | 8.2 MNOK | 5.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 3.2 MNOK | 5.2 MNOK | 4.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 3.1 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK | 4.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.0 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.0 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 4871051.
Further
Similar companies
- Skavl Media Invest AS index 49, rank 3,436 · compare
- Inderøyningen AS index 49, rank 3,437 · compare
- Appelsin Media AS index 49, rank 3,438 · compare
- Vogt IT AS index 49, rank 3,439 · compare
- Jenzen AS index 49, rank 3,441 · compare