Quality Support AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin −7.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 11.4%
- Returns · return on assets −11.6% Weaker than the industry Industry: 18.5%
- Solidity · equity ratio 35.9% About like the industry Industry: 44.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.00 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.68
- Growth · revenue growth −8.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 6.5%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
27of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 12 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 4,658 of 5,283 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,861 of 6,604 · Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 9 and resilience 33 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Quality Support AS is 24 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 5,281 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −7.5% (median 11.4%) and equity ratio 35.9% (median 44.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 14 % from 2023 to 2025, to 1.3 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 3.9% in 2023 to −7.5% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 44.4% in 2023 to 35.9% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.5 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.0 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.5 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 963913567
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (70.200)
- Purpose
- Konsulentarbeid innen organisasjons-, leder-, og personalutvikling spesielt rettet mot kvalitets- ledelse og utvikling.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.4 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 22 March 1992 34 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Masløveien 14, 3133 DUKEN (FÆRDER)
- Municipality
- Færder rank 8–17 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Quality Support AS has a score of 27 for 2025, rank 5,861 of 6,604 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 48 against peers, revenue growth −8.2% against a median of 6.5%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 9 against peers, operating margin −7.5% against a median of 11.4%. Liquidity: percentile 15 against peers, current ratio 1.00 against a median of 1.68.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −14.1 (median 28.2); financial costs as a share of debt 1.3% (median 0.4%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 1.00 (median 1.68).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −8.0% (median 12.3%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −14.1 (median 28.2); Financial costs as a share of debt 1.3% (median 0.4%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 1.00 (median 1.68).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −8.0% (median 12.3%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −7.5% (median 11.4%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −36.7% (median −7.1%); Current ratio 1.00 (median 1.68).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 5.7%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 9 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 40 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 15 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 48 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 29 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 26 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −7.5% | 11.4% |
| Profit margin | −8.0% | 12.3% |
| Return on assets | −11.6% | 18.5% |
| Equity ratio | 35.9% | 44.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.79 | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 1.00 | 1.68 |
| Revenue growth | −8.2% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 27, Quality Support AS does better than 12% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (5,283 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Quality Support AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
17 days | 52 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−36.7% | −7.1% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
88.6% | 54.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−14.1 | 28.2 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.3% | 0.4% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 1.6% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.5 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose by 7.1 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 7.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Quality Support AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 5% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −14.6% | 11.8% | −18.5 percentage points | −1.0 percentage points | −17.5 percentage points |
| 2025 | −7.5% | 11.4% | +7.1 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Quality Support AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities rose 4.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: legal and accounting activities, annual average | 100.4 | 107.7 | 127.0 | 135.2 | 141.7 | 149.6 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +7.3% | +17.9% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: management consultancy (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: management consultancy rose 6.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: management consultancy, annual average | 99.4 | 104.0 | 114.9 | 116.0 | 123.6 | 128.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +17.3% | +4.6% | +10.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: legal and accounting (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: legal and accounting rose 4.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: legal and accounting, annual average | 100.0 | 104.8 | 111.8 | 117.4 | 123.2 | 127.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.4% | +4.8% | +6.7% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: legal and accounting (indeks)
Wage index: legal and accounting rose 5.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Quality Support AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: legal and accounting, annual average | 86.2 | 89.8 | 93.9 | 99.1 | 104.4 | 108.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.1% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +5.6% | +5.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Quality Support AS had an operating margin of −7.5% and an equity ratio of 35.9% in 2025, and ranks 5,861 of 6,604 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio rose from 16.3% to 35.9% and the operating margin rose from −14.6% to −7.5%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 4.1 | 1 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Quality Support AS?
The operating margin was −7.5% in 2025, against a median of 11.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −11.6%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Quality Support AS?
The equity ratio was 35.9% in 2025 (median 44.0%). Debt-to-equity was 1.79 (median 1.09).
What is the liquidity of Quality Support AS like?
The current ratio was 1.00 in 2025 (median 1.68). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Quality Support AS compare in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning?
Quality Support AS ranks 5,861 of 6,604 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 4,658 of 5,283. Revenue changed by −8.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metodia AS |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | −45.4% | 23 |
| Darwin AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 5.0% | 40 |
| Stadhav Prosjekt AS |  Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 13.0% | 56 |
| Quality Support AS (this company) | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −7.5% | 27 |
| Businessconsulting AS | Elephant |
1 MNOK | −5.5% | 54 |
| Sitron AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 8.4% | 52 |
| Panor Public Affairs AS | Cheetah |
1 MNOK | 49.9% | 54 |
| Prolego AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 41.2% | 77 |
| Bdconsult AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −13.6% | 17 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 36 | 13 | 27 | |
| Rank | 4,360 | 6,116 | 5,861 | |
| Operating margin | 3.9% | −14.6% | −7.5% | |
| Return on assets | 5.8% | −24.5% | −11.6% | |
| Equity ratio | 44.4% | 16.3% | 35.9% | |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 0.72 | 1.00 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −6.3% | −8.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.5 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.0 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.7 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.5 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.4 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6820498.
Further
Similar companies
- Europa Media Norge AS index 27, rank 5,859 · compare
- Advisers AS index 27, rank 5,860 · compare
- Regnskapskontoret Knarvik AS index 27, rank 5,862 · compare
- Ato Regnskap AS index 27, rank 5,863 · compare
- Nordavind Utvikling AS index 27, rank 5,864 · compare