Opus One AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
58of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 65 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,670 of 4,817 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,490 of 7,315 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 76 and resilience 54 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Opus One AS is 7 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 4,811 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 26.8% (median 6.6%) and equity ratio 40.4% (median 39.5%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 4 % from 2023 to 2025, to 8.9 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 38.2% in 2023 to 26.8% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 34.5% in 2023 to 40.4% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Opus One AS has a score of 58 for 2025, rank 2,490 of 7,315 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 76 against peers, operating margin 26.8% against a median of 6.6%. Consistency: percentile 67 against peers.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 36 against peers, revenue growth −1.1% against a median of 6.5%.
Worth a closer look
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 95 days (median 46 days).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 4.3 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −4.2, the industry +0.1 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 95 days (median 46 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 76 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 47 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 55 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 36 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 67 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 59 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 26.8% | 6.6% |
| Profit margin | 27.7% | 6.8% |
| Return on assets | 36.0% | 13.1% |
| Equity ratio | 40.4% | 39.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.47 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 1.72 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | −1.1% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 58, Opus One AS does better than 65% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,817 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Opus One AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
95 days | 46 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−19.0% | −9.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
66.4% | 56.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
255.3 | 9.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.2% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
2.3% | 0.3% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −1.7 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Opus One AS fell by 4.2 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.1 points. So the company did 4.3 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Opus One AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 5% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31.0% | 6.5% | −7.2 percentage points | +0.5 percentage points | −7.6 percentage points |
| 2025 | 26.8% | 6.6% | −4.2 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points | −4.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Opus One AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Opus One AS fell 4.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Opus One AS had an operating margin of 26.8% and an equity ratio of 40.4% in 2025, and ranks 2,490 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 31.0% to 26.8% and the equity ratio rose from 35.1% to 40.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 6 MNOK and 31 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 26 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | 31 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.6 | 6 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 43 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 27 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −4 MNOK |
| Equity value | 31 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Opus One AS?
The operating margin was 26.8% in 2025, against a median of 6.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 36.0%.
How solid is Opus One AS?
The equity ratio was 40.4% in 2025 (median 39.5%). Debt-to-equity was 1.47 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Opus One AS like?
The current ratio was 1.72 in 2025 (median 1.54).
How does Opus One AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Opus One AS ranks 2,490 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,670 of 4,817. Revenue changed by −1.1% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embla AS |  Beaver |
9 MNOK | 5.6% | 51 |
| Xlent Ålesund AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | 4.0% | 36 |
| Caddiesoft Norge AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | −3.1% | 23 |
| Megabite AS |  Cheetah |
9 MNOK | 19.9% | 54 |
| Opus One AS (this company) |  Lion |
9 MNOK | 26.8% | 58 |
| Kursagenten AS |  Elephant |
9 MNOK | 2.7% | 51 |
| KODR 3.0 AS · same municipality | Cheetah |
9 MNOK | 26.8% | 61 |
| Wrixit AS · same municipality | Lion |
9 MNOK | 8.1% | 59 |
| Ludico AS · same municipality | Beaver |
9 MNOK | 4.6% | 49 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 1
- Total awarded value since 2024
- 12.3 MNOK
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 September 2024 | FORSVARSMATERIELL | Anskaffelse av HRM systemforvalter databasedrift | 12.3 MNOK |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Dependence on public contracts
Awarded value in the year seen against revenue the same year. This is not a share of revenue: the value is the whole contract, often for several years, and it does not necessarily become revenue that year.
| Year | Contracts | Awarded value | Awarded value against revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | 12.3 MNOK | 137% |
Largest public buyers since 2024
100% of the awarded value since 2024 came from FORSVARSMATERIELL. Public buyers in all: 1.
| Buyer | Contracts | Value | Share of value |
|---|---|---|---|
| FORSVARSMATERIELL | 1 | 12.3 MNOK | 100% |
Key contracts
The largest contracts by awarded value, framework agreements excluded.
| Date | Buyer | Contract | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 September 2024 | FORSVARSMATERIELL | Anskaffelse av HRM systemforvalter databasedrift | 12.3 MNOK |
- The value is the whole contract as stated by the buyer, often for several years.
- Framework agreements are left out of the sums, since the value is a ceiling. Many frameworks are not marked in Doffin and may still be included.
- Only awards where Doffin gives the company's organisation number.
- Contracts without a stated value are counted but not summed.
- An indication of dependence, not an accounting figure. End dates are rarely in the Doffin data.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 27 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 974472597
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Purpose
- Utføre konsulenttjenester innen utvikling av EDB- systemer, samt hva hermed står i forbindelse, herunder å delta i andre selskaper med lignende virksomhet.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 5.4 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 24 May 1995 31 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Sørkedalsveien 231C, 0754 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 3
- Largest owner
- 34.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 67%
- Owners over 60
- 67% of the shares held by persons (median age 60)
Change 2007–2025: 34% of the shares changed owner (0 new and 1 departed owners).
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 65 | 55 | 58 | |
| Rank | 1,696 | 2,813 | 2,490 | |
| Operating margin | 38.2% | 31.0% | 26.8% | |
| Return on assets | 38.4% | 37.1% | 36.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 34.5% | 35.1% | 40.4% | |
| Current ratio | 1.57 | 1.58 | 1.72 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −2.6% | −1.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9.2 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 8.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 3.5 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 3.6 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | 2.8 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 9.3 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.3 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 3.2 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 3.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 6.1 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 5.9 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK | 4.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 7150937.
Further
Similar companies
- 3Mt Communications AS index 58, rank 2,487 · compare
- Ytringen Avis AS index 58, rank 2,489 · compare
- Ametra AS index 58, rank 2,491 · compare
- Peer Consulting AS index 58, rank 2,492 · compare
- Amend AS index 58, rank 2,494 · compare