Wright Holding AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
69of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 83 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 177 of 1,064 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 531 of 3,245 · Undervisning
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 72 and resilience 61 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Wright Holding AS is 18 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,064 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 68.9% (median 3.3%) and equity ratio 35.0% (median 22.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 29 MNOK | 18 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 68.9% | 3.3% |
| Profit margin | 31.3% | 2.9% |
| Return on assets | 6.3% | 8.2% |
| Equity ratio | 35.0% | 22.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.85 | 2.46 |
| Current ratio | 5.57 | 1.19 |
| Revenue growth | 11.6% | 5.6% |
| Revenue per employee | 5.72 MNOK | 0.71 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 69, Wright Holding AS does better than 83% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,064 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Wright Holding AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
375 days | 26 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
1 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
74.7% | −9.2% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
34.1% | 53.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
1.6 | 4.2 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
5.6% | 0.5% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 4.9% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 21.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 12.2 MNOK, 12.2 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Wright Holding AS has a score of 69 for 2025, rank 531 of 3,245 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 98 against peers, current ratio 5.57 against a median of 1.19. Growth: percentile 75 against peers, revenue growth 11.6% against a median of 5.6%.
Weakest: Consistency: percentile 39 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 375 days (median 26 days).
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 3.1 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +4.3, the industry +1.2 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Wright Holding AS rose by 4.3 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 1.2 points. So the company did 3.1 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Wright Holding AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 4% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64.6% | 2.1% | +34.5 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points | +34.9 percentage points |
| 2025 | 68.9% | 3.3% | +4.3 percentage points | +1.2 percentage points | +3.1 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Wright Holding AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Wright Holding AS rose 4.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.1% | 64.6% | 68.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Wright Holding AS rose 4.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.1% | 64.6% | 68.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: education (indeks)
Wage index: education rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Wright Holding AS rose 4.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: education, annual average | 88.6 | 91.8 | 96.8 | 101.8 | 106.7 | 110.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.9% | +3.6% | +5.5% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.1% | 64.6% | 68.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Wright Holding AS had an operating margin of 68.9% and an equity ratio of 35.0% in 2025, and ranks 531 of 3,245 in Undervisning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 64.6% to 68.9% and revenue grew by 12%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 126 MNOK and 145 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.8 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 12.2 | 126 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.8 | 145 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 163 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 111 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −15 MNOK |
| Equity value | 126 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 3% on the cost of equity gives a value 32% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Education.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 375 days (median 26 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −5.7%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 72 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 62 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 98 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 75 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 39 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 74 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Wright Holding AS?
The operating margin was 68.9% in 2025, against a median of 3.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 6.3%.
How solid is Wright Holding AS?
The equity ratio was 35.0% in 2025 (median 22.6%). Debt-to-equity was 1.85 (median 2.46).
What is the liquidity of Wright Holding AS like?
The current ratio was 5.57 in 2025 (median 1.19).
How does Wright Holding AS compare in Undervisning?
Wright Holding AS ranks 531 of 3,245 in Undervisning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 177 of 1,064. Revenue changed by 11.6% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tungbilskolen AS |  Beaver |
32 MNOK | 2.0% | 43 |
| Halaas Trafikkskole AS |  Cheetah |
30 MNOK | 8.6% | 58 |
| Gerds Trafikkskole AS | Cheetah |
29 MNOK | 4.5% | 56 |
| Wright Holding AS (this company) |  Lion |
29 MNOK | 68.9% | 69 |
| Metro Trafikkskole AS | Cheetah |
28 MNOK | 12.9% | 73 |
| SVEIN SVENDSEN & Sønn Trafikkskole AS | Lion |
27 MNOK | 7.0% | 53 |
| Agder Storbilskole AS | Lion |
26 MNOK | 20.5% | 76 |
| Olavs Trafikkskole AS | Cheetah |
24 MNOK | 8.7% | 54 |
| Agere Trafikkskole AS | Lion |
24 MNOK | 6.2% | 57 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group accounts · 2025
59 of 100
Rank 3 of 9 groups in Undervisning. Groups are ranked only against other groups in the same sector, never against single companies.
- Operating revenue, group
- 481 MNOK
- Operating profit, group
- 23 MNOK
- Profit before tax, group
- 6 MNOK
- Total assets, group
- 632 MNOK
- Equity, group
- 152 MNOK
| Key figure | The group | The company alone (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 4.7% | 68.9% |
| Return on assets | 4.0% | 6.3% |
| Equity ratio | 24.1% | 35.0% |
| Current ratio | 0.60 | 5.57 |
| Revenue growth | 6.4% | 11.6% |
Group index in earlier years: 2023: 57 (5 of 12), 2024: 52 (4 of 11).
Same formulas and weights as the company index. Group and company are never added together, and the group accounts are not part of sector averages or company rankings.
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre, group accounts 2025 (open data, NLOD 2.0).
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Group structure · 2025
17 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Wright Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Group accounts. Wright Holding AS for 2025: index 59 of 100, number 3 of 9 groups.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Undervisning (7 companies), Eiendom (7 companies), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company), Overnatting og servering (1 company), Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (1 company) 17 of 17 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 355 in all. Oslo 282, Trondheim 41, Sandnes 12, Skien 11, Melhus 9 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 2 companies: Infinity Drift AS, Wright Corner Pub AS
- Loss
- 2 companies: Infinity Drift AS, Kjøretøy og Maskin Utleie AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Melhus Trafikkskole AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Wright Holding AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 976843401
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Undervisning (85.531)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 June 2026
- Founded
- 1 October 1996 30 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Sørengkaia 70, 0194 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 549300VSHDWYP5HO6W02 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
Majority owner of: Wright's Eiendom AS (100%), Wright Corner Pub AS (100%), Sørengkaia 70 AS (100%), Sørengkaia AS (100%), Wright Apartments AS (100%), Garver Ytterborgsvei 96 AS (100%), Hafjell Lodge AS (100%), Lodgehyttene AS (100%)
The portfolio: 10 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 9 of them as majority owner. The average index is 55. 1 have negative equity and 1 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Wright Group Holding AS (96%), Topcamp Holding AS (1%), Wright's Eiendom AS (100%), Garver Ytterborgsvei 96 AS (100%), Hafjell Lodge AS (100%), Lodgehyttene AS (100%), Wright Corner Pub AS (100%), Sørengkaia 70 AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 73 | 80 | 69 | |
| Rank | 558 | 171 | 531 | |
| Operating margin | 30.1% | 64.6% | 68.9% | |
| Return on assets | 1.6% | 5.7% | 6.3% | |
| Equity ratio | 35.4% | 36.4% | 35.0% | |
| Current ratio | 19.55 | 12.49 | 5.57 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 105.1% | 11.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 12.5 MNOK | 25.7 MNOK | 28.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 3.8 MNOK | 16.6 MNOK | 19.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −4.7 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.3 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK | 6.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | −5.0 MNOK | −2.3 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 10.3 MNOK | 15.5 MNOK | 12.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 345.5 MNOK | 324.3 MNOK | 338.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 41.2 MNOK | 22.4 MNOK | 44.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 122.3 MNOK | 118.0 MNOK | 118.5 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 122.2 MNOK | 117.9 MNOK | 118.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 223.2 MNOK | 206.3 MNOK | 219.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 2.1 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | 8.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7194555.
Further
Similar companies
- Malimo AS index 69, rank 525 · compare
- Soldagen Barnehage AS index 69, rank 526 · compare
- 100-Meterskogen Barnehage AS index 69, rank 527 · compare
- Keiron AS index 69, rank 529 · compare
- Bibelskolen Fjellhaug AS index 69, rank 540 · compare