Intense AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Accounts for 2025 are missing. The deadline was 31 July 2026. The Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish when accounts arrived, only the latest year filed.
Score · fiscal year 2024
28of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 17 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,230 of 3,890 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,034 of 5,959 · Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 12 and resilience 46 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Intense AS is 22 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 50 among 3,885 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin −11.4% (median 4.5%) and equity ratio 41.2% (median 29.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −11.4% | 4.5% |
| Profit margin | −12.3% | 3.6% |
| Return on assets | −17.5% | 8.6% |
| Equity ratio | 41.2% | 29.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.43 | 1.49 |
| Current ratio | 0.27 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | −13.7% | 8.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 28, Intense AS does better than 17% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (3,890 companies) in 2024.
Score 2022–2024
- Intense AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
6 days | 41 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−26.3% | −8.5% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
78.1% | 52.3% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−11.0 | 4.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
2.7% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
26.2% | 1.7% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −2.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.1 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Intense AS has a score of 28 for 2024, rank 5,034 of 5,959 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 56 against peers, equity ratio 41.2% against a median of 29.9%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 6 against peers, current ratio 0.27 against a median of 1.34. Profitability: percentile 12 against peers, operating margin −11.4% against a median of 4.5%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.7 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.27 (median 1.34).
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −11.0 (median 4.0); financial costs as a share of debt 2.7% (median 1.2%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −12.3% (median 3.6%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2024 the operating margin of Intense AS fell by 3.4 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 3.0 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Intense AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 15% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | −8.0% | 4.9% | −15.4 percentage points | −2.5 percentage points | −12.9 percentage points |
| 2024 | −11.4% | 4.5% | −3.4 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | −3.0 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Intense AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: business support services (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: business support services rose 5.2% in 2024; the operating margin of Intense AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: business support services, annual average | 100.0 | 104.9 | 111.1 | 116.9 | 121.3 | 122.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +4.9% | +5.9% | +5.2% | +3.8% | +0.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | – | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: administrative and support services (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: administrative and support services rose 3.8% in 2024; the operating margin of Intense AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: administrative and support services, annual average | 99.5 | 117.4 | 126.0 | 130.8 | 138.4 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.3% | +17.9% | +7.4% | +3.8% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | – | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.2% in 2024; the operating margin of Intense AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | – | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate rose 0.96 percentage points in 2024; the operating margin of Intense AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | – | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: business support services (indeks)
Wage index: business support services rose 5.7% in 2024; the operating margin of Intense AS fell 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: business support services, annual average | 81.5 | 85.5 | 89.7 | 94.8 | 100.3 | 106.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +4.9% | +4.9% | +5.7% | +5.7% | +6.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | – | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Intense AS had an operating margin of −11.4% and an equity ratio of 41.2% in 2024, and ranks 5,034 of 5,959 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting.
From 2023 to 2024: the equity ratio rose from 17.5% to 41.2% and the operating margin fell from −8.0% to −11.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 4 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.3 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.1 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 2.7 | 4 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services, Office Equipment & Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.7 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.27 (median 1.34).
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −11.0 (median 4.0); Financial costs as a share of debt 2.7% (median 1.2%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −12.3% (median 3.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −11.4% (median 4.5%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −26.3% (median −8.5%); Current ratio 0.27 (median 1.34).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.7% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 0.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 12 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 56 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 6 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 28 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 45 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 33 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Intense AS?
The operating margin was −11.4% in 2024, against a median of 4.5% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −17.5%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Intense AS?
The equity ratio was 41.2% in 2024 (median 29.9%). Debt-to-equity was 1.43 (median 1.49).
What is the liquidity of Intense AS like?
The current ratio was 0.27 in 2024 (median 1.34). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Intense AS compare in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting?
Intense AS ranks 5,034 of 5,959 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,230 of 3,890. Revenue changed by −13.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utleiekompaniet AS |  Beaver |
12 MNOK | −2.5% | 23 |
| Servix Bergen AS |  Cheetah |
11 MNOK | 16.0% | 58 |
| Pcm Utleie AS |  Lion |
10 MNOK | 6.8% | 69 |
| To-Be-More AS | Beaver |
10 MNOK | 0.8% | 29 |
| Tønsberg Lyd og Lys AS | Lion |
10 MNOK | 12.3% | 67 |
| Riggpartner AS |  Elephant |
10 MNOK | −4.0% | 35 |
| Intense AS (this company) | Beaver |
9 MNOK | −11.4% | 28 |
| Messelys AS | Cheetah |
8 MNOK | 8.7% | 60 |
| Musikkgarasjen AS | Cheetah |
7 MNOK | 6.4% | 51 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
8 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Otvenge Holding AS.
Otvenge Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (5 companies), Eiendom (2 companies), Kultur og fritid (1 company) 8 of 8 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Strengenvegen 31 AS
- Loss
- 4 companies: Intense AS, Strengenvegen 31 AS, Alpha Event AS, Trondheimsveien 436B Invest AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 979914679
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (77.220)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 4 May 1998 28 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.50 MNOK
- Business address
- Kloppaveien 18, 1472 FJELLHAMAR (LØRENSKOG)
- Municipality
- Lørenskog rank 1–10 of 13 in KOSTRA group 10
- Latest accounts filed
- 2024
- Website
- www.intense.no
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Otvenge Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: Otvenge Holding AS
The owner: the majority owner Otvenge Holding AS (holds 100%) made a loss in 2024. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Otvenge Holding AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 1 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): Otvenge Holding AS
Holds shares in: Amphiscene AS (50%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2022–2024
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 49 | 22 | 28 | |
| Rank | 48 | 4,736 | 5,034 | |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | −8.0% | −11.4% | |
| Return on assets | 10.5% | −11.4% | −17.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 30.0% | 17.5% | 41.2% | |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.27 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −4.4% | −13.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 11.3 MNOK | 10.8 MNOK | 9.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.8 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.8 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.6 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 8.0 MNOK | 7.6 MNOK | 6.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.1 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.0 MNOK | – | 1.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 5.6 MNOK | 6.3 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 5.2 MNOK | 6.0 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6321243.
Further
Similar companies
- MD Personal AS index 28, rank 5,032 · compare
- Haugland Agri AS index 28, rank 5,033 · compare
- Top the Fjords AS index 28, rank 5,035 · compare
- Intakt Midt AS index 28, rank 5,037 · compare
- Ren Vask og Miljøinnredning AS index 28, rank 5,041 · compare