RUNING AS
Score · fiscal year 2023
59of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 66 % of small companies in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,271 of 3,738 · Sjømat
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 46 and solidity 83 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
RUNING AS is 9 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 50 among 3,282 companies.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | – | 9.0% |
| Profit margin | – | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Equity ratio | 87.6% | 35.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.14 | 1.08 |
| Current ratio | 0.08 | 1.66 |
| Revenue growth | – | 10.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 59, RUNING AS does better than 66% of small companies in the same sector (3,284 companies) in 2023.
Score 2023–2025
- RUNING AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
What the numbers say
RUNING AS had an operating margin of – and an equity ratio of 87.6% in 2023, and ranks 1,271 of 3,738 in Sjømat.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 2 MNOK and 17 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 17 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 12.5 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.08 (median 1.66).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.8% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch Revenue not reported
- watch No revenue but large assets
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −5.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 46 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 83 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 7 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 95 | weight 15% |
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is RUNING AS?
The operating margin was – in 2023, against a median of 9.0% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.5%.
How solid is RUNING AS?
The equity ratio was 87.6% in 2023 (median 35.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.14 (median 1.08).
What is the liquidity of RUNING AS like?
The current ratio was 0.08 in 2023 (median 1.66). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does RUNING AS compare in Sjømat?
RUNING AS ranks 1,271 of 3,738 in Sjømat for 2023. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 1,119 of 3,284.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 980448878
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjømat (03.110)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 14 January 1999 27 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.30 MNOK
- Business address
- Osholmen 15, 6006 ÅLESUND
- Municipality
- Ålesund rank 2–6 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Rune Giskeødegård
- Chair of the board
- Rune Giskeødegård
- Auditor
- MØRE REVISJON AS
- Accountant
- SANDE REKNESKAP AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 28 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 59 | 62 | 60 | |
| Rank | 1,271 | 1,043 | 1,099 | |
| Operating margin | – | – | – | |
| Return on assets | 1.5% | 1.8% | 1.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 87.6% | 98.8% | 99.0% | |
| Current ratio | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.21 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | – | – |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 19.3 MNOK | 17.3 MNOK | 17.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 16.9 MNOK | 17.1 MNOK | 17.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 16.6 MNOK | 16.8 MNOK | 16.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.4 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 28 October 2026, accounts id 5248825.
Further
Similar companies
- HEPSØFJORD AS index 59, rank 1,268 · compare
- EMICAS AS index 59, rank 1,269 · compare
- GRIEG MATURITAS II AS index 59, rank 1,270 · compare
- VENARØY AS index 59, rank 1,272 · compare
- DEEPVAULT DATA AS index 59, rank 1,273 · compare