Eikenga 17 AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 13.9% Weaker than the industry Industry: 47.7%
- Returns · return on assets −2.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 8.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 27.9%
- Liquidity · current ratio 0.28 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.40
- Growth · revenue growth 2.8% About like the industry Industry: 3.3%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
28of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 11 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 21,385 of 23,907 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 27,055 of 30,137 · Eiendom
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 15 and resilience 23 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Eikenga 17 AS is 22 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,901 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 13.9% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 8.5% (median 27.9%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 5 % from 2023 to 2025, to 3.2 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 30.3% in 2023 to 13.9% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 11.7% in 2023 to 8.5% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.1 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 17.6 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK | 15.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.0 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 15.5 MNOK | 15.0 MNOK | 14.3 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 981019326
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Å investere i fast eiendom eller selskaper som eier fast eiendom, eie og leie ut fast eiendom; samt alt hva herved står i forbindelse.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 23 August 1999 27 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.20 MNOK
- Business address
- Fridtjof Nansens plass 4, 0160 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Former names
- VVS Huset Invest AS until 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Eikenga 17 AS has a score of 28 for 2025, rank 27,055 of 30,137 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 55 against peers, revenue growth 2.8% against a median of 3.3%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 15 against peers, operating margin 13.9% against a median of 47.7%. Liquidity: percentile 17 against peers, current ratio 0.28 against a median of 1.40.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.5 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.28 (median 1.40).
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 8.5% (median 27.9%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −9.9% (median 24.4%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 3.5 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.28 (median 1.40).
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 8.5% (median 27.9%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −9.9% (median 24.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 13.9% (median 47.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 15 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 21 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 17 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 55 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 31 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 25 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 13.9% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | −9.9% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | −2.1% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 8.5% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 10.82 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 0.28 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | 2.8% | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 28, Eikenga 17 AS does better than 11% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,907 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Eikenga 17 AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
8 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
– | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
– | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
– | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.0% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 87.8% | |
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose by 4.6 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 3.9 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Eikenga 17 AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 6% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9.3% | 46.9% | −20.9 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | −21.8 percentage points |
| 2025 | 13.9% | 47.7% | +4.6 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +3.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose 4.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose 4.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose 4.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose 4.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Eikenga 17 AS rose 4.6 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Eikenga 17 AS had an operating margin of 13.9% and an equity ratio of 8.5% in 2025, and ranks 27,055 of 30,137 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 9.3% to 13.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 7 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | 7 MNOK |
| P/B | 0.7 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 11 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 7 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 7 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Eikenga 17 AS?
The operating margin was 13.9% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −2.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Eikenga 17 AS?
The equity ratio was 8.5% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 10.82 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Eikenga 17 AS like?
The current ratio was 0.28 in 2025 (median 1.40). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Eikenga 17 AS compare in Eiendom?
Eikenga 17 AS ranks 27,055 of 30,137 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 21,385 of 23,907. Revenue changed by 2.8% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gledeshuset Eiendom AS |  Beaver |
3 MNOK | 38.6% | 41 |
| Skager Eiendom AS |  Elephant |
3 MNOK | 10.4% | 32 |
| Bygarasjen Bodø AS · same municipality | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 40.9% | 38 |
| Eikenga 17 AS (this company) | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 13.9% | 28 |
| Raufossfabrikken AS · same municipality | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 52.3% | 30 |
| HMS Eiendom AS |  Lion |
3 MNOK | 59.3% | 77 |
| Nordbø-Eiendom AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 68.5% | 62 |
| Nye Lims Eiendom AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 35.0% | 23 |
| Søderlundmyra Eiendom AS | Elephant |
3 MNOK | 31.2% | 49 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
103 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Victoria Eiendom AS.
Victoria Eiendom AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (101 companies), Kultur og fritid (1 company) 102 of 103 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 129 in all. Oslo 129 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Loss
- 11 companies: Norbygata Veksthuset AS, Karl Johans Gate 8 AS, Hjalmar Johansens Gate 12 AS, Professor Dahls Gate 18-20 AS, Eikenga 17 AS, Norbygata Drivhuset AS …
- Changed 2024–2025
- 4 companies joined the group: Haraldrudveien 40 AS, C. Sundts Gate 18 AS, Karl Johans Gate 8 AS, Kristiansvig AS. 4 companies left, among them: Jæren Handlepark 7 AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Victoria Eiendom AS
-
Eiendomsspar AS
- Eikenga 17 AS you are here
- Grand Hotel AS
- Norbygata Fabrikken AS
- Karl Johans Gate 33 AS
- Klingenberggaten 4 AS
- Øvre Slottsgate 12 AS
- Karl Johans Gate 3 AS
- Hoffsveien 4 AS
- Storgata 2-4-6 AS
- Kjelsåsveien 161 AS
- Tordenskiolds Gate 8-10 AS
- Dronningensgate 40 AS
- and 47 more companies
- Bilbygg AS
- Kongsveien 30 AS
- Arbins Gate 1 AS
- Drammensveien 159 AS
- Thorvald Meyers Gate 2 Næring AS
- Nedre Slottsgate 21 AS
- Professor Birkelands Vei 36 AS
- Bygdøy Allé 1 AS
- Majorstuveien 38 AS
- Professor Birkelandsvei 32 B AS
- Rådhusgata 28 Oslo AS
- Hausmannsgate 28 AS
- Wessels Veg 70 Stjørdal AS
- and 9 more companies
-
The tree shows up to 4 levels below the top. Large groups have more companies than shown.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Eiendomsspar AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: Victoria Eiendom AS
- Eiendomsspar AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 1 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): Eiendomsspar AS
Departed (companies): VVS Huset Holding AS
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 26 | 20 | 28 | |
| Rank | 23,519 | 27,140 | 27,055 | |
| Operating margin | 30.3% | 9.3% | 13.9% | |
| Return on assets | 1.1% | −3.3% | −2.1% | |
| Equity ratio | 11.7% | 10.2% | 8.5% | |
| Current ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 0.28 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.1 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 17.6 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK | 15.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.0 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.1 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 15.5 MNOK | 15.0 MNOK | 14.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6977084.
Further
Similar companies
- Nesodden Invest AS index 28, rank 27,052 · compare
- Tess Mosjøen Eiendom AS index 28, rank 27,054 · compare
- Gustav S Eiendom AS index 28, rank 27,056 · compare
- Askjer Eiendom AS index 28, rank 27,058 · compare
- Gannet AS index 28, rank 27,059 · compare