Dynamic Solution AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
65of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 82 % of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Medium: 112 of 615 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,144 of 10,060 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 98 and resilience 17 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Dynamic Solution AS is 14 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 615 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 56.2% (median 5.6%) and equity ratio 2.3% (median 32.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 78 MNOK | 95 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 56.2% | 5.6% |
| Profit margin | 56.3% | 5.6% |
| Return on assets | 70.7% | 12.6% |
| Equity ratio | 2.3% | 32.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 42.50 | 1.95 |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | 37.1% | 10.2% |
| Revenue per employee | 12.94 MNOK | 3.04 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 65, Dynamic Solution AS does better than 82% of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector (615 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Dynamic Solution AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
143 days | 90 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
– | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−39.2% | −1.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
29.1% | 24.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
114.6 | 8.3 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.6% | 1.7% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 10.0% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −30.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.4 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Dynamic Solution AS has a score of 65 for 2025, rank 2,144 of 10,060 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 98 against peers, operating margin 56.2% against a median of 5.6%. Growth: percentile 80 against peers, revenue growth 37.1% against a median of 10.2%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 4 against peers, equity ratio 2.3% against a median of 32.7%. Liquidity: percentile 6 against peers, current ratio 0.71 against a median of 1.34.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 2.3% (median 32.7%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.4 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.71 (median 1.34).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 37.1% (median 10.2%); current ratio 0.71 (median 1.34).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose by 5.9 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 5.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Dynamic Solution AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 5% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 50.3% | 5.3% | −3.8 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points | −3.6 percentage points |
| 2025 | 56.2% | 5.6% | +5.9 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynamic Solution AS rose 5.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Dynamic Solution AS had an operating margin of 56.2% and an equity ratio of 2.3% in 2025, and ranks 2,144 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 37% and the operating margin rose from 50.3% to 56.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 4 MNOK and 438 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 426 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 438 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 4 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 558 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 426 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −13 MNOK |
| Equity value | 438 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 2% on the cost of equity gives a value 24% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (74): Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 2.3% (median 32.7%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.4 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.71 (median 1.34).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 37.1% (median 10.2%); Current ratio 0.71 (median 1.34).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −39.2% (median −1.3%); Current ratio 0.71 (median 1.34).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 98 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 4 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 6 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 80 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 47 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 60 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Dynamic Solution AS?
The operating margin was 56.2% in 2025, against a median of 5.6% among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector. Return on assets was 70.7%.
How solid is Dynamic Solution AS?
The equity ratio was 2.3% in 2025 (median 32.7%). Debt-to-equity was 42.50 (median 1.95).
What is the liquidity of Dynamic Solution AS like?
The current ratio was 0.71 in 2025 (median 1.34). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Dynamic Solution AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Dynamic Solution AS ranks 2,144 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Medium it is number 112 of 615. Revenue changed by 37.1% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gexcon AS |  Cheetah |
84 MNOK | 16.2% | 41 |
| Viking Kontroll AS |  Beaver |
84 MNOK | −11.1% | 23 |
| Smir AS | Beaver |
79 MNOK | −12.2% | 5 |
| Cleanworld AS | Cheetah |
78 MNOK | 27.0% | 67 |
| Dynamic Solution AS (this company) | Cheetah |
78 MNOK | 56.2% | 65 |
| Players Management Group AS |  Lion |
74 MNOK | 42.1% | 70 |
| Brandpeople AS | Cheetah |
72 MNOK | 6.7% | 50 |
| Cubility AS · same municipality | Cheetah |
71 MNOK | 10.2% | 37 |
| Init Stavanger AS | Cheetah |
70 MNOK | 20.9% | 58 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Sir Solution AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Sir Solution AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (2 companies), Overnatting og servering (1 company) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 6 in all. Sandnes 6 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Loss
- 1 company: Tauro Hill IV AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Tauro Hill IV AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Sir Solution AS
- Dynamic Solution AS you are here
- Tauro Hill IV AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 982523486
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (74.990)
- Morning company class
- Medium
- Employees
- 6 registered 10 March 2025
- Founded
- 22 September 2000 26 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.20 MNOK
- Business address
- Vassbotnen 15A, 4313 SANDNES
- Municipality
- Sandnes rank 4 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Sir Solution AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Sir Solution AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
70% of the shares changed owner (0 new and 4 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
Departed (companies): Grip Management AS, Job Holding AS
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 57 | 57 | 65 | |
| Rank | 3,481 | 3,523 | 2,144 | |
| Operating margin | 54.1% | 50.3% | 56.2% | |
| Return on assets | 74.2% | 67.6% | 70.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 3.2% | 4.0% | 2.3% | |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.71 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 26.8% | 37.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 44.7 MNOK | 56.7 MNOK | 77.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 24.2 MNOK | 28.5 MNOK | 43.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 23.8 MNOK | 29.1 MNOK | 43.7 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 5.3 MNOK | 6.4 MNOK | 10.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 18.5 MNOK | 22.6 MNOK | 33.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 33.4 MNOK | 43.3 MNOK | 62.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 12.7 MNOK | 23.3 MNOK | 43.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.1 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.8 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 32.3 MNOK | 41.6 MNOK | 60.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 32.3 MNOK | 41.6 MNOK | 60.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7168629.
Further
Similar companies
- Ppm Prosjekt Trondheim AS index 65, rank 2,104 · compare
- Holar Ola Roald AS index 65, rank 2,114 · compare
- Carbon Limits AS index 65, rank 2,123 · compare
- Emptor International AS index 65, rank 2,152 · compare
- Consat Norge AS index 65, rank 2,186 · compare