TIC AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
61of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 74 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,080 of 4,158 · Sjømat
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 30 and solidity 91 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
TIC AS is 11 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 3,607 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −40.9% (median 9.9%) and equity ratio 97.6% (median 36.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −40.9% | 9.9% |
| Profit margin | −17.2% | 6.6% |
| Return on assets | 0.7% | 3.1% |
| Equity ratio | 97.6% | 36.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.02 | 1.03 |
| Current ratio | 20.29 | 1.66 |
| Revenue growth | 5.7% | 13.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 61, TIC AS does better than 74% of small companies in the same sector (3,639 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- TIC AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
TIC AS has a score of 61 for 2025, rank 1,080 of 4,158 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 91 against peers, current ratio 20.29 against a median of 1.66. Solidity: percentile 91 against peers, equity ratio 97.6% against a median of 36.4%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 30 against peers, operating margin −40.9% against a median of 9.9%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −17.2% (median 6.6%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −40.9% (median 9.9%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
TIC AS had an operating margin of −40.9% and an equity ratio of 97.6% in 2025, and ranks 1,080 of 4,158 in Sjømat.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a profit to a loss before tax and the operating margin fell from −35.8% to −40.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 22 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 22 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −17.2% (median 6.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −40.9% (median 9.9%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 60.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −5.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 30 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 91 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 91 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 41 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 62 | weight 15% |
Durability: 68 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is TIC AS?
The operating margin was −40.9% in 2025, against a median of 9.9% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 0.7%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is TIC AS?
The equity ratio was 97.6% in 2025 (median 36.4%). Debt-to-equity was 0.02 (median 1.03).
What is the liquidity of TIC AS like?
The current ratio was 20.29 in 2025 (median 1.66).
How does TIC AS compare in Sjømat?
TIC AS ranks 1,080 of 4,158 in Sjømat for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 941 of 3,639. Revenue changed by 5.7% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 982547644
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjømat (03.110)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 16 September 2000 26 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.25 MNOK
- Business address
- Kirkeveien 58, 9790 KJØLLEFJORD (LEBESBY)
- Municipality
- Lebesby rank 13–33 of 36 in KOSTRA group 15
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 2 October 2023
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Arne Berg
- Chair of the board
- Arne Berg
- Deputy member
- Bård Rasmussen
- Accountant
- WIIKS REGNSKAPSKONTOR AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 28 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 77 | 66 | 61 | |
| Rank | 302 | 751 | 1,080 | |
| Operating margin | 8.1% | −35.8% | −40.9% | |
| Return on assets | 1.7% | 7.7% | 0.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 96.5% | 97.7% | 97.6% | |
| Current ratio | 20.93 | 46.34 | 20.29 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −42.0% | 5.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.6 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.1 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.5 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.4 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | −0.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 22.6 MNOK | 23.1 MNOK | 23.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 10.0 MNOK | 12.4 MNOK | 6.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 21.8 MNOK | 22.6 MNOK | 22.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 21.6 MNOK | 22.4 MNOK | 22.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.5 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 28 October 2026, accounts id 7200744.
Further
Similar companies
- BLUE AQUA MANAGEMENT AS index 61, rank 1,077 · compare
- IVC AS index 61, rank 1,078 · compare
- TRELLEVIK KYSTFISKE AS index 61, rank 1,079 · compare
- NORTH CAPE KING CRAB AS index 61, rank 1,081 · compare
- C AAMODT AS index 61, rank 1,083 · compare