Dynaplan AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
65of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 78 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,063 of 4,817 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,524 of 7,315 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 71 and resilience 88 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Dynaplan AS is 14 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 4,811 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 48.9% (median 6.6%) and equity ratio 90.6% (median 39.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 7 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 48.9% | 6.6% |
| Profit margin | 40.1% | 6.8% |
| Return on assets | 13.8% | 13.1% |
| Equity ratio | 90.6% | 39.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.10 | 1.07 |
| Current ratio | 10.41 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | −34.6% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 65, Dynaplan AS does better than 78% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,817 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Dynaplan AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
125 days | 46 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
0.0% | −9.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
90.4% | 56.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
4.8 | 9.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
29.9% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 0.3% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.0 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Dynaplan AS has a score of 65 for 2025, rank 1,524 of 7,315 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 95 against peers, current ratio 10.41 against a median of 1.54. Solidity: percentile 94 against peers, equity ratio 90.6% against a median of 39.5%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 22 against peers, revenue growth −34.6% against a median of 6.5%.
Worth a closer look
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 125 days (median 46 days).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 5.4 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −3.9, the industry +1.6 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell by 3.9 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 1.6 points. So the company did 5.4 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Dynaplan AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 6% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 52.8% | 5.0% | +32.8 percentage points | −1.0 percentage points | +33.8 percentage points |
| 2025 | 48.9% | 6.6% | −3.9 percentage points | +1.6 percentage points | −5.4 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Dynaplan AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Dynaplan AS fell 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Dynaplan AS had an operating margin of 48.9% and an equity ratio of 90.6% in 2025, and ranks 1,524 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue fell by 35% and the operating margin fell from 52.8% to 48.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 21 MNOK and 52 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.4 | 37 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 12.4 | 52 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.4 | 21 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 46 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 29 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −24 MNOK |
| Equity value | 52 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −84% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (58): Publishing & Newspapers.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 125 days (median 46 days).
- positive
Upper quartile on profitability, solidity and liquidity. What sets this company apart from the rest of the sector?
Based on: Operating margin 48.9% (median 6.6%); Equity ratio 90.6% (median 39.5%); Current ratio 10.41 (median 1.54).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 29.9% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 71 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 94 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 95 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 22 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 72 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 72 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Dynaplan AS?
The operating margin was 48.9% in 2025, against a median of 6.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 13.8%.
How solid is Dynaplan AS?
The equity ratio was 90.6% in 2025 (median 39.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.10 (median 1.07).
What is the liquidity of Dynaplan AS like?
The current ratio was 10.41 in 2025 (median 1.54).
How does Dynaplan AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Dynaplan AS ranks 1,524 of 7,315 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,063 of 4,817. Revenue changed by −34.6% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grassfish Norway AS · same municipality |  Elephant |
8 MNOK | −3.6% | 49 |
| Zerosubnet AS | Elephant |
8 MNOK | 5.2% | 47 |
| Deem AS |  Cheetah |
8 MNOK | 45.1% | 64 |
| Bass AS | Elephant |
8 MNOK | −17.2% | 49 |
| Rasterex Software AS · same municipality | Cheetah |
8 MNOK | 6.7% | 45 |
| Flexi Soft AS |  Beaver |
7 MNOK | −4.4% | 31 |
| Dynaplan AS (this company) |  Lion |
7 MNOK | 48.9% | 65 |
| Clue Norge AS · same municipality | Lion |
7 MNOK | 48.7% | 60 |
| Systempartner International AS · same municipality | Beaver |
7 MNOK | 2.1% | 43 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 986751459
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (58.290)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 February 2004 22 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.12 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o CSC (Norway) AS, Bryggegata 6, 0250 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: Orgvue Holdings LIMITED
- Orgvue Holdings LIMITED (United Kingdom) · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
75% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 6 departed owners). The majority owner changed. Foreign owners now hold more than half.
New owners (companies): Orgvue Holdings LIMITED
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 61 | 89 | 65 | |
| Rank | 2,046 | 28 | 1,524 | |
| Operating margin | 20.0% | 52.8% | 48.9% | |
| Return on assets | 7.2% | 28.6% | 13.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 61.8% | 86.1% | 90.6% | |
| Current ratio | 1.27 | 3.65 | 10.41 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 38.7% | −34.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 8.1 MNOK | 11.3 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.6 MNOK | 6.0 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.8 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.4 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | 2.2 MNOK | 5.7 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 25.6 MNOK | 25.7 MNOK | 27.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 12.4 MNOK | 13.1 MNOK | 26.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 15.8 MNOK | 22.1 MNOK | 24.5 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 15.3 MNOK | 21.6 MNOK | 23.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 9.8 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 9.8 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6534279.
Further
Similar companies
- Luft Studios AS index 65, rank 1,523 · compare
- A5 Film AS index 65, rank 1,525 · compare
- Kbb Medic AS index 65, rank 1,526 · compare
- Aparte AS index 65, rank 1,527 · compare
- Ellingsen Technologies AS index 65, rank 1,528 · compare