BYGGIMPULS AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
43of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 33 % of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Medium: 1,190 of 1,765 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 13,252 of 20,428 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 24 and solidity 48 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
BYGGIMPULS AS is 7 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 1,764 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.6% (median 4.5%) and equity ratio 30.1% (median 30.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 319 MNOK | 91 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.6% | 4.5% |
| Profit margin | 1.0% | 4.5% |
| Return on assets | 4.0% | 11.4% |
| Equity ratio | 30.1% | 30.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 2.32 | 2.23 |
| Current ratio | 1.64 | 1.38 |
| Revenue growth | −15.6% | 6.8% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.30 MNOK | 2.53 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 43, BYGGIMPULS AS does better than 33% of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector (1,765 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- BYGGIMPULS AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector
BYGGIMPULS AS has a score of 43 for 2025, rank 13,252 of 20,428 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 71 against peers. Liquidity: percentile 70 against peers, current ratio 1.64 against a median of 1.38.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 14 against peers, revenue growth −15.6% against a median of 6.8%. Profitability: percentile 24 against peers, operating margin 0.6% against a median of 4.5%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin 0.6% (median 4.5%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
BYGGIMPULS AS had an operating margin of 0.6% and an equity ratio of 30.1% in 2025, and ranks 13,252 of 20,428 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue fell by 16% and the equity ratio rose from 24.0% to 30.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 25 MNOK and 63 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 25 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 63 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 34 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 0.6% (median 4.5%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 1.8%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 24 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 48 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 70 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 14 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 71 | weight 15% |
Durability: 36 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is BYGGIMPULS AS?
The operating margin was 0.6% in 2025, against a median of 4.5% among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector. Return on assets was 4.0%.
How solid is BYGGIMPULS AS?
The equity ratio was 30.1% in 2025 (median 30.4%). Debt-to-equity was 2.32 (median 2.23).
What is the liquidity of BYGGIMPULS AS like?
The current ratio was 1.64 in 2025 (median 1.38).
How does BYGGIMPULS AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
BYGGIMPULS AS ranks 13,252 of 20,428 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Medium it is number 1,190 of 1,765. Revenue changed by −15.6% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 987975105
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (43.420)
- Morning company class
- Medium
- Employees
- 245 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 15 January 2005 21 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.28 MNOK
- Business address
- Kjellingmoveien 4, 1930 AURSKOG (AURSKOG-HØLAND)
- Municipality
- Aurskog-Høland rank 17–35 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 549300GLA11BLP2O0G63 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Jon Martin Klafstad
- Chair of the board
- Dag Jakob Opedal
- Board member
- Tore Morten Ulvedalen
- Board member
- Dorota Pustelnik
- Board member
- Lukasz Gruszycki
- Board member
- Emil Przewloka
- Board member
- Camilla Sandberg
- Auditor
- CENTER REVISJON AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- Parent not reported
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 29 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 26 | 40 | 43 | |
| Rank | 15,094 | 13,258 | 13,252 | |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 2.3% | 0.6% | |
| Return on assets | 2.4% | 8.6% | 4.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 19.9% | 24.0% | 30.1% | |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 1.41 | 1.64 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −1.4% | −15.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 383.5 MNOK | 378.2 MNOK | 319.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 4.4 MNOK | 8.8 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 6.1 MNOK | 9.6 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | 3.9 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | −3.0 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 131.3 MNOK | 130.1 MNOK | 112.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 104.7 MNOK | 110.9 MNOK | 98.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 26.1 MNOK | 31.3 MNOK | 33.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 17.2 MNOK | 22.1 MNOK | 24.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 105.1 MNOK | 98.9 MNOK | 78.5 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 86.4 MNOK | 78.9 MNOK | 59.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 6713026.
Further
Similar companies
- AS Betongbygg index 43, rank 13,236 · compare
- BACKE OPPLAND AS index 43, rank 13,243 · compare
- LOTHE & MOTZFELDT AS index 43, rank 13,244 · compare
- NRC KEPT AS index 43, rank 13,260 · compare
- FLAGET AS index 43, rank 13,276 · compare