ENERGETIC AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
36of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 27 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 8,309 of 11,388 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 17,201 of 23,059 · Handel
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 81 and solidity 0 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
ENERGETIC AS is 14 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 11,385 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 47.5% (median 2.6%) and equity ratio −168.9% (median 33.8%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 4 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 47.5% | 2.6% |
| Profit margin | −301.3% | 2.2% |
| Return on assets | 12.9% | 6.2% |
| Equity ratio | −168.9% | 33.8% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.23 |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 1.75 |
| Revenue growth | −8.3% | 4.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 36, ENERGETIC AS does better than 27% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (11,388 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- ENERGETIC AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
ENERGETIC AS has a score of 36 for 2025, rank 17,201 of 23,059 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 81 against peers, operating margin 47.5% against a median of 2.6%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −168.9% against a median of 33.8%. Consistency: percentile 5 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −168.9% (median 33.8%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −301.3% (median 2.2%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
ENERGETIC AS had an operating margin of 47.5% and an equity ratio of −168.9% in 2025, and ranks 17,201 of 23,059 in Handel.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio fell from −44.0% to −168.9% and the operating margin rose from 3.9% to 47.5%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | debt above value |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −168.9% (median 33.8%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −301.3% (median 2.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 35.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 1.5%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 81 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 51 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 23 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 5 | weight 15% |
Durability: 34 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is ENERGETIC AS?
The operating margin was 47.5% in 2025, against a median of 2.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 12.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is ENERGETIC AS?
The equity ratio was −168.9% in 2025 (median 33.8%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of ENERGETIC AS like?
The current ratio was 1.79 in 2025 (median 1.75).
How does ENERGETIC AS compare in Handel?
ENERGETIC AS ranks 17,201 of 23,059 in Handel for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 8,309 of 11,388. Revenue changed by −8.3% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 988753394
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Handel (46.900)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 3 October 2005 21 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Andre Løvestam, Bjørnenga 20F, 1364 FORNEBU (BÆRUM)
- Municipality
- Bærum rank 1 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 20 October 2023
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 529900XMNS8YEFKX3C55 renews 14 April 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Andre Piszczkowski Løvestam
- Deputy member
- Ingvild Rosenørn Kran Løvestam
- Accountant
- ECIT SERVICES AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 29 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 34 | 30 | 36 | |
| Rank | 15,348 | 18,207 | 17,201 | |
| Operating margin | 79.7% | 3.9% | 47.5% | |
| Return on assets | 18.8% | 0.6% | 12.9% | |
| Equity ratio | −49.6% | −44.0% | −168.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.64 | 3.40 | 1.79 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −52.9% | −8.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.9 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 2.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.5 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK | −3.7 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.9 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK | −3.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 2.8 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 4.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 12.3 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 4.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Equity | −6.1 MNOK | −3.8 MNOK | −7.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −6.2 MNOK | −9.1 MNOK | −13.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 18.3 MNOK | 12.4 MNOK | 12.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 6863722.
Further
Similar companies
- RABALDERGRIMSTAD AS index 36, rank 17,197 · compare
- HC TRADING AS index 36, rank 17,198 · compare
- UNIQ GARN AS index 36, rank 17,200 · compare
- RAMEX AS index 36, rank 17,203 · compare
- STRYN BYGGIMPORT AS index 36, rank 17,205 · compare