Raid AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 47.0% About like the industry Industry: 47.7%
- Returns · return on assets 8.8% About like the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 56.2% Better than the industry Industry: 27.9%
- Liquidity · current ratio 0.63 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.40
- Growth · revenue growth 23.4% Better than the industry Industry: 3.3%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
63of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 78 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 5,208 of 23,905 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,402 of 30,132 · Eiendom
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 52 and resilience 64 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Raid AS is 13 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,899 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 47.0% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 56.2% (median 27.9%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 21 % from 2023 to 2025, to 5.0 MNOK. The operating margin rose from 31.1% in 2023 to 47.0% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 54.6% in 2023 to 56.2% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4.2 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.3 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 40.0 MNOK | 40.2 MNOK | 40.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 21.8 MNOK | 21.6 MNOK | 22.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 18.2 MNOK | 18.6 MNOK | 17.8 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 988979767
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Investere i andre selskap, samt hva hermed måtte stå i forbindelse.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 November 2026
- Founded
- 22 November 2005 20 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.75 MNOK
- Business address
- 5384 TORANGSVÅG (AUSTEVOLL)
- Municipality
- Austevoll rank 1 of 18 in KOSTRA group 2
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- LEI
- 894500WUTCOI43TJF381 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Raid AS has a score of 63 for 2025, rank 6,402 of 30,132 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 78 against peers, revenue growth 23.4% against a median of 3.3%. Solidity: percentile 71 against peers, equity ratio 56.2% against a median of 27.9%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 29 against peers, current ratio 0.63 against a median of 1.40.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 23.4% (median 3.3%); current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
- Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed? Based on: net working capital to revenue −9.7% (median −12.4%); current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 12.3 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +13.1, the industry +0.7 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.6 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 23.4% (median 3.3%); Current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −9.7% (median −12.4%); Current ratio 0.63 (median 1.40).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 52 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 71 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 29 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 78 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 66 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 54 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 5 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 47.0% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | 52.7% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 8.8% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 56.2% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.78 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | 23.4% | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 63, Raid AS does better than 78% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,905 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Raid AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
47 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−9.7% | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
9.2% | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
2.5 | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
5.2% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
93.6% | 87.8% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.9 MNOK, 0.9 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
The accounts for 2025 lack the figures needed.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Raid AS rose by 13.1 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 12.3 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Raid AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 10% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33.9% | 46.9% | +2.8 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points |
| 2025 | 47.0% | 47.7% | +13.1 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +12.3 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Raid AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Raid AS rose 13.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Raid AS rose 13.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Raid AS rose 13.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Raid AS rose 13.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Raid AS rose 13.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Raid AS had an operating margin of 47.0% and an equity ratio of 56.2% in 2025, and ranks 6,402 of 30,132 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 33.9% to 47.0% and revenue grew by 23%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 7 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The methods differ widely (the highest is 3.0 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 30,734 NOK per share, on 218 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 3 MNOK and 10 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | 7 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | 3 MNOK |
| P/B | 0.7 | 10 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 32 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 20 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 17 MNOK |
| Equity value | 3 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is 84% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Personnel cost per employee
- 0.33 MNOK per employee in 2025
Comparable companies have a median of 0.26 MNOK. This company is above 58% of them (611 companies in the same industry and size class).
Payroll costs are 33% of revenue.
Payroll costs in the accounts divided by 5 employees in the business register. Payroll costs include employer's contribution and pension, so they are higher than wages. The employee count is a snapshot and can differ from the average over the accounting year. - Equity paid out or paid in
- 0.9 MNOK left equity beyond the result in 2025.
That equals 43% of the year's result.
Over 2 years it equals 67% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
- The chair is under 60.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 0 of 3 on the board are 60 or older.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Raid AS?
The operating margin was 47.0% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 8.8%.
How solid is Raid AS?
The equity ratio was 56.2% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 0.78 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Raid AS like?
The current ratio was 0.63 in 2025 (median 1.40). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Raid AS compare in Eiendom?
Raid AS ranks 6,402 of 30,132 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 5,208 of 23,905. Revenue changed by 23.4% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glomma Butikkeiendom AS |  Cheetah |
5 MNOK | 80.8% | 58 |
| Smøla Handelspark AS |  Elephant |
5 MNOK | 53.2% | 45 |
| Flakk Eiendom AS | Elephant |
5 MNOK | −44.6% | 33 |
| Anmas AS | Cheetah |
5 MNOK | 29.3% | 51 |
| Skagen 10 AS |  Lion |
5 MNOK | 90.3% | 70 |
| Raid AS (this company) | Lion |
5 MNOK | 47.0% | 63 |
| Fyrstikkbakken 2-4 AS | Cheetah |
5 MNOK | 65.4% | 59 |
| Havre Property AS | Lion |
5 MNOK | 9.8% | 68 |
| Linneatunet AS | Cheetah |
5 MNOK | 54.2% | 44 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 12 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No known owner
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
The portfolio: 7 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 0 of them as majority owner. The average index is 38. 1 have negative equity and 4 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Vestfrakt Shipping AS (25%), Øpstad Eiendom AS (33%), Lighthouse Ship Management AS (33%), Trondberg Eiendom AS (50%), Bio Feeder AS (6%), Austevoll Melaks AS (22%), ENDÚR ASA (0%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 53 | 47 | 63 | |
| Rank | 11,907 | 16,864 | 6,402 | |
| Operating margin | 31.1% | 33.9% | 47.0% | |
| Return on assets | 3.5% | 5.9% | 8.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 54.6% | 53.8% | 56.2% | |
| Current ratio | 8.02 | 0.46 | 0.63 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −2.0% | 23.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4.2 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.3 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.3 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.1 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Total assets | 40.0 MNOK | 40.2 MNOK | 40.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.6 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 21.8 MNOK | 21.6 MNOK | 22.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 21.2 MNOK | 20.9 MNOK | 22.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 18.2 MNOK | 18.6 MNOK | 17.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 7215960.
Further
Similar companies
- JS WA Eiendom AS index 63, rank 6,400 · compare
- Gilhus Invest AS index 63, rank 6,401 · compare
- Nedre Bakklandet Eiendom AS index 63, rank 6,403 · compare
- Partyman AS index 63, rank 6,404 · compare
- Tresa AS index 63, rank 6,407 · compare