Blastmanager AS

Org. no. 989474278 · Bærum · AS

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

Key facts

Employees – Not registered in the Central Coordinating Register
Operating revenue · 2025 17.9 MNOK Small
Net profit · 2025 6.8 MNOK
Equity · 2025 30.6 MNOK
Founded 2006 20 years in operation
Quick check · fiscal year 2025

Is the company run well?

Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.

  • Profitability · operating margin 37.9% Better than the industry Industry: 5.3%
  • Returns · return on assets 24.7% Better than the industry Industry: 9.9%
  • Solidity · equity ratio 84.3% Better than the industry Industry: 34.5%
  • Liquidity · current ratio 5.63 Better than the industry Industry: 1.34
  • Growth · revenue growth −1.1% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.7%

The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology

Score · fiscal year 2025

78of 100

How to read this: the company is ahead of 97 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?

Rank in the Morning class Small: 53 of 1,532 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 291 of 7,319 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon

Profile

Lion · Leader

High profitability, high resilience

Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 85 and resilience 90 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology

Against the sector

Blastmanager AS is 27 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.

Median score 51 among 1,531 companies.

Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 37.9% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio 84.3% (median 34.5%).

Source: Register of Company Accounts and Central Coordinating RegisterFetched 10 November 2026Report an issue
Development

How it has gone · 2023–2025

Revenue is about the same: 17.9 MNOK in 2025 against 17.8 MNOK in 2023. The operating margin rose from 27.7% in 2023 to 37.9% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 75.5% in 2023 to 84.3% in 2025.

Score · 2025 78 −9 points since 2023 (weaker)
Operating revenue · 2025 17.9 MNOK about the same since 2023
Net profit · 2025 6.8 MNOK +49% since 2023 (better)
Operating margin · 2025 37.9% +10.2 pp since 2023 (better)
Equity ratio · 2025 84.3% +8.8 pp since 2023 (better)
Current ratio · 2025 5.63 +2.38 since 2023 (better)

Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year

Accounts in short

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue17.8 MNOK18.1 MNOK17.9 MNOK
Operating profit4.9 MNOK6.1 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Net profit4.6 MNOK6.1 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Total assets23.4 MNOK29.6 MNOK36.3 MNOK
Equity17.7 MNOK23.8 MNOK30.6 MNOK
Total liabilities5.7 MNOK5.8 MNOK5.7 MNOK

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year

From the Central Coordinating Register

Org. no.
989474278
Legal form
AS
Sector
Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
Purpose
Utvikling og salg av interaktive løsninger for anleggsbransjen samt andre produkter/tjenester som naturlig hører sammen med dette, herunder å delta i andre selskap med lignende virksomet, og kjøp og salg av aksjer i andre foretak.
Morning company class
Small
Employees
0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 4.7 MNOK (2025).
Founded
27 January 2006 20 years in operation
Share capital
0.10 MNOK
Business address
Strandveien 17, 1366 LYSAKER (BÆRUM)
Municipality
Bærum rank 1 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
Latest accounts filed
2025
VAT registered
Yes
Website
www.blastmanager.no
The company's business municipality, Bærum. The map shows the municipality, not the address. Map source: Kartverket (CC BY 4.0).

Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre

Summary analysis

Blastmanager AS has a score of 78 for 2025, rank 291 of 7,319 in the sector.

Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 97 against peers, current ratio 5.63 against a median of 1.34. Solidity: percentile 97 against peers, equity ratio 84.3% against a median of 34.5%.

No area is clearly below its peers.

Worth a closer look

Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made

Indications · 2025

Worth a closer look

  • watch

    Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?

    Based on: Receivable days 648 days (median 73 days).

  • positive

    Upper quartile on profitability, solidity and liquidity. What sets this company apart from the rest of the sector?

    Based on: Operating margin 37.9% (median 5.3%); Equity ratio 84.3% (median 34.5%); Current ratio 5.63 (median 1.34).

Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.

Financial costs were 3.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.

See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector

Data quality

No anomalies found in the figures.

Stress test · 2026

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.

The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology

Components · 2025

What the score is made of

Profitability85 weight 40%
Solidity97 weight 20%
Liquidity97 weight 5%
Growth49 weight 25%
Consistency74 weight 10%

Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?

Durability: 81 (average over 3 years)

Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.

Key figures · 2025

The numbers behind the score

The numbers behind the score · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianAhead of
Operating revenue18 MNOK20 MNOK
Operating margin 37.9% 5.3% 95 %
Profit margin 48.7% 5.5% shown, not part of the index
Return on assets 24.7% 9.9% 75 %
Equity ratio 84.3% 34.5% 97 %
Debt-to-equity 0.19 1.61 97 %
Current ratio 5.63 1.34 97 %
Revenue growth −1.1% 7.7% 29 %

The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.

With an index of 78, Blastmanager AS does better than 97% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,532 companies) in 2025.

Over time

Score 2023–2025

CompanyMedian0255075100202320242025
  • Blastmanager AS
  • Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt · 2025

Working capital and debt

Working capital and debt · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Working capital
Receivable days
All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue.
648 days 73 days 96 %
Inventory and other current assets, days
Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue.
0 days 0 days 71 %
Net working capital to revenue
Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations.
145.8% −7.8% 99 %
Cash share of current assets
How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash.
0.7% 43.2% 2 %
Debt and interest burden
Interest coverage (times)
Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt.
32.0 7.9 65 %
Financial costs as a share of debt
All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate.
3.7% 1.2% 74 %
Long-term share of debt
Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year.
– 13.9% not compared

Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 26.2 MNOK.

Of the financial costs of 0.2 MNOK, 0.2 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.

The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.

Our calculations Returns and quality · 2025

Returns, debt against earnings and quality

Returns, debt against earnings and quality · 2025
MeasureCompanyMedianHigher than
Returns
Return on equity (ROE)
Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity.
25.0% 20.3% 53 %
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed.
22.3% 17.9% 53 %
Net margin
Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity.
37.9% 4.6% 96 %
Asset turnover (revenue over assets)
Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split.
0.49 1.57 13 %
Equity multiplier
Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split.
1.19 2.61 3 %
Debt and financing
Net debt in times operating result
Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive.
– −0.8 not compared
Fixed-asset cover
Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt.
– 1.33 not compared
Quick ratio (without inventory)
Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments.
5.63 1.27 98 %
Quality and resilience
Effective tax rate
Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions.
22.3% 22.0% 73 %
Operating leverage
Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive.
– 1.6 not compared
Payroll costs over revenue
Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business.
26.2% 42.8% 24 %
Revenue safety margin
How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower.
59.2% 19.7% 90 %
Cash runway (months)
Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months.
– 10 mo. not compared

DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 37.9% × asset turnover 0.49 × multiplier 1.19 = 22.2% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.

The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate

The industry or the company: what drove the result?

In 2025 the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose by 4.6 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 4.3 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.

Over 2 year-to-year changes Blastmanager AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 4% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.

The operating margin of Blastmanager AS against comparable companies, year by year
YearThe companyComparable (median) Change, companyChange, industryThe company's own
202433.4%5.0% +5.6 percentage points +0.1 percentage points +5.5 percentage points
202537.9%5.3% +4.6 percentage points +0.3 percentage points +4.3 percentage points

Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.

The company and its sector's drivers

Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Blastmanager AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.

Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))

Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

Service prices: information and communication per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Service prices: information and communication, annual average100.0103.3108.7112.2116.7120.0 (so far)
Change from the year before–+3.2%+5.3%+3.2%+4.0%+2.8%
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source

Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))

Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

Turnover index: information and communication per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Turnover index: information and communication, annual average99.6111.4126.4128.3134.2141.3 (so far)
Change from the year before+14.7%+11.8%+13.5%+1.5%+4.6%+5.3%
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source

USD/NOK (kr)

USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

USD/NOK per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
USD/NOK, annual average8.599.6110.5610.7510.399.54 (so far)
Change from the year before−8.8%+11.9%+9.9%+1.7%−3.3%−8.2%
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Policy rate (prosent)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0103.0 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+3.0%
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source

Wage index: IT services (indeks)

Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Blastmanager AS rose 4.6 percentage points.

Wage index: IT services per year and the operating margin of Blastmanager AS
Measure202120222023202420252026
Wage index: IT services, annual average84.987.892.397.3101.5105.4 (so far)
Change from the year before+4.9%+3.5%+5.1%+5.4%+4.4%+3.8%
The company's operating margin––27.7%33.4%37.9%–

Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

Analysis · 2025

What the numbers say

Blastmanager AS had an operating margin of 37.9% and an equity ratio of 84.3% in 2025, and ranks 291 of 7,319 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.

From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 33.4% to 37.9%.

This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.

Estimated value · 2025

Three simple methods

Our calculations

Suggested price: about 69 MNOK

The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation.
That is about 34,500 NOK per share, on 2,000 shares in the shareholder register.

The methods give between 60 MNOK and 75 MNOK.

MethodInputMultipleListed basisEstimate
P/E Net profit (mean 2023–2025): 5.8 MNOK 18.0 105 MNOK 71 MNOK
EV/EBIT Operating profit (mean 2023–2025): 5.9 MNOK
less net debt −0.2 MNOK (rough figure)
14.9 89 MNOK 60 MNOK
P/B Equity: 30.6 MNOK 3.6 110 MNOK 75 MNOK
EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equityNOK
Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple88 MNOK
Enterprise value after the size adjustment60 MNOK
Less net debt (rough figure)0 MNOK
Equity value60 MNOK

Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.

The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 3% on the cost of equity gives a value 32% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.

The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.

Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more

A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation

Our calculations

Figures you will not find in any register

We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate

Equity paid out or paid in
Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Over 2 years it equals 0% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure.
Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
  • The chair is under 60.
  • The managing director is under 60.
  • 0 of 2 on the board are 60 or older.
Age is this year minus the birth year in the registers and can be a year off. It says something about age, not about anyone planning to step down.

Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more

2025

Questions and answers

How profitable is Blastmanager AS?

The operating margin was 37.9% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 24.7%.

How solid is Blastmanager AS?

The equity ratio was 84.3% in 2025 (median 34.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.19 (median 1.61).

What is the liquidity of Blastmanager AS like?

The current ratio was 5.63 in 2025 (median 1.34).

How does Blastmanager AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?

Blastmanager AS ranks 291 of 7,319 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 53 of 1,532. Revenue changed by −1.1% from the year before.

2025

Competitors

The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.

Dotnet Internals AS: 77 / 69Gastro Planner AS: 83 / 74Kogenta AS: 48 / 22Blastmanager AS: 85 / 90Vind Technologies AS: 3 / 40Findable AS: 1 / 73Memcare AS: 6 / 40Kommunion AS: 31 / 67Retailhub AS: 26 / 3600252550507575100100Resilience, percentile against peers →↑ Profitability, percentile against peers

CompanyProfileOperating revenueOperating marginScore
Dotnet Internals AS · same municipality Lion 18 MNOK 15.2% 58
Gastro Planner AS Lion 18 MNOK 30.5% 78
Kogenta AS Beaver 18 MNOK 6.0% 31
Blastmanager AS (this company) Lion 18 MNOK 37.9% 78
Vind Technologies AS Beaver 18 MNOK −90.3% 28
Findable AS Elephant 18 MNOK −241.9% 35
Memcare AS · same municipality Beaver 18 MNOK −121.4% 28
Kommunion AS Elephant 18 MNOK 0.9% 45
Retailhub AS Beaver 18 MNOK −0.4% 37

The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis

Ownership and roles

Loading roles …

Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.

Shareholders (2025)

Number of shareholders
1 (one owner)
Largest owner
100.0%
Split
companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 100%
Group chain
Ultimate owner: Infobric AB
  • Infobric AB (Sweden) · 100.0%

Change 2007–2025: 100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 2 departed owners). The majority owner changed. Foreign owners now hold more than half.
New owners (companies): Infobric AB
Departed (companies): T Hustveit AS, View Group Itc AS

Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.

Error in the data?

Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.

Report an issue

Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information

Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.

Details

Year by year · 2023–2025

Key figure202320242025Trend
Index877978
Rank193256291
Operating margin27.7%33.4%37.9%
Return on assets25.4%26.8%24.7%
Equity ratio75.5%80.4%84.3%
Current ratio3.254.365.63
Revenue growth–1.8%−1.1%

Accounts

From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).

Key figure202320242025
Operating revenue17.8 MNOK18.1 MNOK17.9 MNOK
Operating profit4.9 MNOK6.1 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Profit before tax5.8 MNOK7.8 MNOK8.7 MNOK
Tax expense1.3 MNOK1.7 MNOK1.9 MNOK
Net profit4.6 MNOK6.1 MNOK6.8 MNOK
Financial expenses0.1 MNOK0.1 MNOK0.2 MNOK
Total assets23.4 MNOK29.6 MNOK36.3 MNOK
Current assets18.6 MNOK25.3 MNOK32.1 MNOK
Equity17.7 MNOK23.8 MNOK30.6 MNOK
Retained earnings17.6 MNOK23.7 MNOK30.5 MNOK
Total liabilities5.7 MNOK5.8 MNOK5.7 MNOK
Current liabilities5.7 MNOK5.8 MNOK5.7 MNOK

Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 6404195.

News and announcements

From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link