3Dp Modelling AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 21.1% Better than the industry Industry: 5.8%
- Returns · return on assets 48.1% Better than the industry Industry: 14.0%
- Solidity · equity ratio 39.3% About like the industry Industry: 33.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.88 Better than the industry Industry: 1.43
- Growth · revenue growth 684.1% Better than the industry Industry: 8.6%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
79of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 97 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 57 of 1,908 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 397 of 10,060 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 89 and resilience 55 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
3Dp Modelling AS is 28 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,907 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 21.1% (median 5.8%) and equity ratio 39.3% (median 33.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 756 % from 2023 to 2025, to 12.5 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −8.5% in 2023 to 21.1% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 15.3% in 2023 to 39.3% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.5 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 12.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 989778501
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (74.990)
- Purpose
- Tilby tjenester innen produktutvikling og utvikling av prototyper, ved hjelp av spesialtilpasset teknologi, herunder delta i annen virksomhet med samme formål.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.2 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 30 March 2006 20 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.15 MNOK
- Business address
- Kjøpmannsgata 10, 6005 ÅLESUND
- Municipality
- Ålesund rank 2–6 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.3dp.as
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
3Dp Modelling AS has a score of 79 for 2025, rank 397 of 10,060 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 96 against peers, revenue growth 684.1% against a median of 8.6%. Profitability: percentile 89 against peers, operating margin 21.1% against a median of 5.8%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 27.0 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +24.9, the industry −2.1 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 89 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 56 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 70 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 96 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 47 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 43 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 13 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 21.1% | 5.8% |
| Profit margin | 21.2% | 5.9% |
| Return on assets | 48.1% | 14.0% |
| Equity ratio | 39.3% | 33.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.55 | 1.77 |
| Current ratio | 1.88 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | 684.1% | 8.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 79, 3Dp Modelling AS does better than 97% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,908 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- 3Dp Modelling AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
93 days | 65 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
5 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
3.7% | −5.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
38.5% | 41.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
532.6 | 15.3 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.1% | 0.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
13.6% | 12.6% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose by 24.9 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 2.1 points. So the company did 27.0 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes 3Dp Modelling AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 8% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −3.8% | 8.0% | +4.7 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points | +5.2 percentage points |
| 2025 | 21.1% | 5.8% | +24.9 percentage points | −2.1 percentage points | +27.0 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of 3Dp Modelling AS rose 24.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
3Dp Modelling AS had an operating margin of 21.1% and an equity ratio of 39.3% in 2025, and ranks 397 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 684% and the operating margin rose from −3.8% to 21.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 5 MNOK and 10 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 9 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 10 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 5 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 14 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 9 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −2 MNOK |
| Equity value | 10 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (74): Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is 3Dp Modelling AS?
The operating margin was 21.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.8% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 48.1%.
How solid is 3Dp Modelling AS?
The equity ratio was 39.3% in 2025 (median 33.0%). Debt-to-equity was 1.55 (median 1.77).
What is the liquidity of 3Dp Modelling AS like?
The current ratio was 1.88 in 2025 (median 1.43).
How does 3Dp Modelling AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
3Dp Modelling AS ranks 397 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 57 of 1,908. Revenue changed by 684.1% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIMCO GROUP (NORWAY) AS |  Lion |
13 MNOK | 4.5% | 58 |
| Fidens AS |  Beaver |
13 MNOK | −0.6% | 21 |
| Witsø og Svea Takst AS |  Cheetah |
13 MNOK | 7.7% | 56 |
| Backstage Management og Produksjon AS | Lion |
13 MNOK | 7.2% | 66 |
| 3Dp Modelling AS (this company) | Lion |
13 MNOK | 21.1% | 79 |
| Calmocean AS | Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 8.7% | 58 |
| Mesh Community AS | Beaver |
12 MNOK | −54.0% | 35 |
| Verify AS | Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 6.9% | 42 |
| Artist for Event AS |  Elephant |
12 MNOK | −0.3% | 36 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 66% of the shares in Trading International AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Trading International AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company), Handel (1 company) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Trading International AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Trading International AS
- 3Dp Modelling AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 66.7%
- Split
- companies 67% · private persons 33% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Trading International AS (67%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Trading International AS (holds 67%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Trading International AS · 66.7%
- 1 private persons · 33.3%
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 19 | 31 | 79 | |
| Rank | 8,043 | 7,787 | 397 | |
| Operating margin | −8.5% | −3.8% | 21.1% | |
| Return on assets | −12.5% | −5.2% | 48.1% | |
| Equity ratio | 15.3% | 12.1% | 39.3% | |
| Current ratio | 1.84 | 2.07 | 1.88 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 9.2% | 684.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.5 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 12.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.2 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 6546873.
Further
Similar companies
- Seaside Services AS index 79, rank 364 · compare
- Naval Consulting and Management AS index 79, rank 366 · compare
- Strinda Dyreklinikk AS index 79, rank 389 · compare
- Tellnor Tech AS index 79, rank 398 · compare
- Oceanica AS index 79, rank 399 · compare