C.C. Solution AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
66of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 83 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 260 of 1,531 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,344 of 7,317 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 66 and resilience 64 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
C.C. Solution AS is 15 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,530 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.9% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio 47.1% (median 34.6%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 3 % from 2023 to 2025, to 17.1 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −0.8% in 2023 to 0.9% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 7.6% in 2023 to 47.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
C.C. Solution AS has a score of 66 for 2025, rank 1,344 of 7,317 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 70 against peers, revenue growth 22.2% against a median of 7.7%. Consistency: percentile 69 against peers.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) 0.0 (median 8.0); financial costs as a share of debt 141.6% (median 1.2%).
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 3.6 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +3.9, the industry +0.3 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) 0.0 (median 8.0); Financial costs as a share of debt 141.6% (median 1.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 141.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 66 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 62 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 64 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 70 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 69 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 36 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 17 MNOK | 20 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.9% | 5.3% |
| Profit margin | 23.3% | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 119.2% | 9.9% |
| Equity ratio | 47.1% | 34.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.12 | 1.61 |
| Current ratio | 1.69 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | 22.2% | 7.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 2.85 MNOK | 1.93 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 66, C.C. Solution AS does better than 83% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,531 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- C.C. Solution AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
54 days | 73 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
117 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
19.0% | −7.8% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
0.4% | 43.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
0.0 | 8.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
141.6% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 13.9% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 3.3 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 6.7 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose by 3.9 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.3 points. So the company did 3.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes C.C. Solution AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 6% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −3.0% | 5.0% | −2.3 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points | −2.4 percentage points |
| 2025 | 0.9% | 5.3% | +3.9 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of C.C. Solution AS rose 3.9 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
C.C. Solution AS had an operating margin of 0.9% and an equity ratio of 47.1% in 2025, and ranks 1,344 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a loss to a profit before tax and the equity ratio rose from 5.4% to 47.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 9 MNOK and 12 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 12 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 9 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is C.C. Solution AS?
The operating margin was 0.9% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 119.2%.
How solid is C.C. Solution AS?
The equity ratio was 47.1% in 2025 (median 34.6%). Debt-to-equity was 1.12 (median 1.61).
What is the liquidity of C.C. Solution AS like?
The current ratio was 1.69 in 2025 (median 1.34).
How does C.C. Solution AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
C.C. Solution AS ranks 1,344 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 260 of 1,531. Revenue changed by 22.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Techweaver AS |  Cheetah |
17 MNOK | 14.5% | 61 |
| Xlent Cyber Security AS | Cheetah |
17 MNOK | 13.8% | 62 |
| Yne AS |  Elephant |
17 MNOK | −1.9% | 43 |
| C.C. Solution AS (this company) |  Lion |
17 MNOK | 0.9% | 66 |
| Green Digital AS | Lion |
17 MNOK | 8.3% | 57 |
| Sarpsborg Data AS | Lion |
17 MNOK | 6.7% | 54 |
| Rubic AS |  Beaver |
17 MNOK | −12.8% | 36 |
| Mobildata Sørlandsparken AS | Beaver |
17 MNOK | −4.4% | 20 |
| Last Friday AS | Beaver |
17 MNOK | 3.6% | 38 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
4 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Namtvedt Xpo AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Namtvedt Xpo AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (3 companies), Handel (1 company) 4 of 4 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 6 in all. Bergen 6 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Loss
- 2 companies: Namtvedt Xpo AS, Bluu AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Namtvedt Xpo AS
-
C.C. Solution AS you are here
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 990700435
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.200)
- Purpose
- Fremstilling/salg av hardware og lisenser inen IT og andre produkter som naturlig faller sammen med dette, herunder å delta i andre selskaper med lignende virksomhet, kjøp og salg av aksjer, eller på annen måte gjøre seg interessert i andre foretagender.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 6 registered 10 June 2026
- Founded
- 2 December 2006 19 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.15 MNOK
- Business address
- Øvre Kråkenes 17, 5152 BØNES (BERGEN)
- Municipality
- Bergen rank 8 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.ccsolution.no
- Former names
- Master Solutions AS until 2007
- LEI
- 64886O9JA4Z4Q7V8U230 renews 11 September 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 6 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 71.2% · top three 96.6%
- Split
- companies 80% · private persons 20% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 80%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Namtvedt Xpo AS (71%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Namtvedt Xpo AS (holds 71%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Namtvedt Xpo AS · 71.2%
- Caamp AS · 5.9%
- Plan Nine AS · 2.4%
- C.C. Solution AS · 0.4%
- 2 private persons · 20.2%
Change 2007–2025:
99% of the shares changed owner (5 new and 1 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): C.C. Solution AS, Caamp AS, Namtvedt Xpo AS, Plan Nine AS
Majority owner of: RD Data AS (100%), Bluu AS (64%)
The portfolio: 3 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 2 of them as majority owner. The average index is 64. 0 have negative equity and 1 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Bluu AS (64%), RD Data AS (100%), C.C. Solution AS (0%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 21 | 19 | 66 | |
| Rank | 5,665 | 6,534 | 1,344 | |
| Operating margin | −0.8% | −3.0% | 0.9% | |
| Return on assets | −1.7% | −7.2% | 119.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 7.6% | 5.4% | 47.1% | |
| Current ratio | 0.53 | 0.56 | 1.69 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −20.9% | 22.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 17.7 MNOK | 14.0 MNOK | 17.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | 4.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | 4.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.8 MNOK | 5.3 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.3 MNOK | 2.8 MNOK | 8.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.2 MNOK | – | 4.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.4 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.4 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7213328.
Further
Similar companies
- Utviklerne AS index 66, rank 1,325 · compare
- Ravn Webveveriet AS index 66, rank 1,334 · compare
- Tmls AS index 66, rank 1,335 · compare
- Kodeks AS index 66, rank 1,339 · compare
- Birr AS index 66, rank 1,365 · compare