Kvisle Eigedom AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
16of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 3 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 23,178 of 23,906 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 29,227 of 30,136 · Eiendom
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 9 and resilience 25 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Kvisle Eigedom AS is 34 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,900 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −8.8% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 2.9% (median 27.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −8.8% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | −42.0% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | −1.5% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 2.9% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 32.96 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 12.36 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | – | 3.3% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 16, Kvisle Eigedom AS does better than 3% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,906 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Kvisle Eigedom AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
279 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
– | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
– | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
– | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−0.3 | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
6.0% | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
91.8% | 87.8% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Of the financial costs of 0.4 MNOK, 0.4 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Kvisle Eigedom AS has a score of 16 for 2025, rank 29,227 of 30,136 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 90 against peers, current ratio 12.36 against a median of 1.40.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 9 against peers, operating margin −8.8% against a median of 47.7%. Solidity: percentile 11 against peers, equity ratio 2.9% against a median of 27.9%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −0.3 (median 1.8); financial costs as a share of debt 6.0% (median 5.0%).
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 2.9% (median 27.9%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −42.0% (median 24.4%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Kvisle Eigedom AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Kvisle Eigedom AS had an operating margin of −8.8% and an equity ratio of 2.9% in 2025, and ranks 29,227 of 30,136 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio fell from 8.9% to 2.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.3 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 16.6 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 0.9 | 0 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.1): Real Estate (Development).
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −0.3 (median 1.8); Financial costs as a share of debt 6.0% (median 5.0%).
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 2.9% (median 27.9%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −42.0% (median 24.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −8.8% (median 47.7%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 279 days (median 40 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 6.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 9 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 11 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 90 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 19 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 34 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Kvisle Eigedom AS?
The operating margin was −8.8% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −1.5%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Kvisle Eigedom AS?
The equity ratio was 2.9% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 32.96 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Kvisle Eigedom AS like?
The current ratio was 12.36 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does Kvisle Eigedom AS compare in Eiendom?
Kvisle Eigedom AS ranks 29,227 of 30,136 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 23,178 of 23,906.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNB Eiendomsutvikling AS |  Elephant |
1 MNOK | 34.4% | 59 |
| Nordbøåsen Tomteselskap AS |  Beaver |
1 MNOK | 26.7% | 36 |
| Frivoll AS | Elephant |
1 MNOK | 13.5% | 50 |
| Elv Eiendom AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 20.3% | 27 |
| Kvisle Eigedom AS (this company) | Beaver |
1 MNOK | −8.8% | 16 |
| Hofseth Eigedom AS |  Lion |
1 MNOK | 60.6% | 62 |
| Bjønnåsen Hyttegrend AS | Elephant |
1 MNOK | 2.3% | 52 |
| EKER BYGG & Prosjekt AS | Beaver |
1 MNOK | 39.5% | 34 |
| Debi AS | Elephant |
1 MNOK | −28.9% | 27 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Kvisle Eigedom AS.
Kvisle Eigedom AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Bygg og anlegg (1 company), Eiendom (1 company) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Kvislelivegen AS
- Loss
- 1 company: Kvisle Eigedom AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Kvisle Eigedom AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 991402845
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.120)
- Purpose
- Utvikle deltakaranes eigedommar i Brokke-området i Valle til hytteområde, arbeide opp infrastruktur i området og å selje hyttetomter, næringstomter og andre tomter i området. Selskapet kan også drive verksemd som står i samband med utviklinga av hytteområde, så som å legge området til rette for turisme gjennom bruk av området og terrenget rundt hytteområdet, lage fritidstilbod og drive turistrelatert tenesteyting og salsverksemd. Selskapet kan sjølv bygge og leige ut hytter, leiligheiter og næringsbygg. Selskapet skal delta i andre selskap - heil- eller deleigde.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 0.0 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 18 June 2007 19 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Setesdalsvegen 3427, 4748 RYSSTAD (VALLE)
- Municipality
- Valle rank 2–22 of 36 in KOSTRA group 15
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- No
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 8 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 10
- Largest owner
- 23.9% · top three 57.6%
- Split
- companies 21% · private persons 79% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 87%
- Owners over 60
- 56% of the shares held by persons (median age 73)
- Myklevatn AS · 20.6%
- 9 private persons · 79.4%
Change 2007–2025:
82% of the shares changed owner (7 new and 6 departed owners).
New owners (companies): Myklevatn AS
Majority owner of: Kvislelivegen AS (100%)
Holds shares in: Brokke Alpinanlegg AS (3%), Kvislelivegen AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 52 | – | 16 | |
| Rank | 12,281 | – | 29,227 | |
| Operating margin | 28.8% | – | −8.8% | |
| Return on assets | 9.1% | −16.5% | −1.5% | |
| Equity ratio | 26.3% | 8.9% | 2.9% | |
| Current ratio | 5.94 | 4.56 | 12.36 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −101.3% | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.9 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.6 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | – |
| Net profit | 0.4 MNOK | −1.7 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 9.6 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.4 MNOK | 8.5 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.5 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 2.4 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 7.1 MNOK | 7.8 MNOK | 7.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.6 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 7187763.
Further
Similar companies
- Ibygget AS index 16, rank 29,224 · compare
- K2 Bolig AS index 16, rank 29,226 · compare
- Selvaag Eiendomsoppgjør AS index 16, rank 29,229 · compare
- Zynergy AS index 16, rank 29,230 · compare
- Lundgutua Eiendom AS index 16, rank 29,231 · compare