NTE MARKED AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
24of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 0 % of large companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 817 of 865 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 15 and solidity 5 out of 100 among large companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
NTE MARKED AS is 24 points below the median for large companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 48 among 42 companies.
Against large companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.5% (median 20.8%) and equity ratio 15.2% (median 35.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1,327 MNOK | 2,359 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.5% | 20.8% |
| Profit margin | −0.2% | 18.0% |
| Return on assets | 3.2% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 15.2% | 35.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 5.59 | 1.80 |
| Current ratio | 1.46 | 1.06 |
| Revenue growth | −1.0% | 9.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 37.90 MNOK | 29.91 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to large companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 24, NTE MARKED AS does better than 0% of large companies in the same sector (42 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- NTE MARKED AS
- Median: large companies in the same sector
NTE MARKED AS has a score of 24 for 2025, rank 817 of 865 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 80 against peers, current ratio 1.46 against a median of 1.06.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 5 against peers, equity ratio 15.2% against a median of 35.7%. Profitability: percentile 15 against peers, operating margin 0.5% against a median of 20.8%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −0.2% (median 18.0%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin 0.5% (median 20.8%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
NTE MARKED AS had an operating margin of 0.5% and an equity ratio of 15.2% in 2025, and ranks 817 of 865 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −3.3% to 0.5%.
NTE MARKED AS did weaker than the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 110 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | debt above value |
| P/B | 1.0 | 110 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −0.2% (median 18.0%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 0.5% (median 20.8%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 4.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was 0.5% in 2025 (sector median 16.0%), and the equity ratio 15.2%. The company had a loss before tax that year. In the other years the operating margin averaged −2.6%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 16.0%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 15 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 5 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 80 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 20 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 20 | weight 15% |
Durability: 26 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is NTE MARKED AS?
The operating margin was 0.5% in 2025, against a median of 20.8% among large companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 3.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is NTE MARKED AS?
The equity ratio was 15.2% in 2025 (median 35.7%). Debt-to-equity was 5.59 (median 1.80).
What is the liquidity of NTE MARKED AS like?
The current ratio was 1.46 in 2025 (median 1.06).
How does NTE MARKED AS compare in Kraft og energi?
NTE MARKED AS ranks 817 of 865 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies of the same size (large companies) it ranks 42 of 42. Revenue changed by −1.0% from the year before.
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 1
- Total awarded value since 2024
- value not stated
- Framework agreements
- 1
- Left out of the total: the value is a ceiling, not actual spend.
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May 2024 | Midtre Namdal Avfallsselskap IKS | Kjøp av elektrisk kraft Midtre Namdal Avfallsselskap IKS, Retura NT AS og OKHH AS | value not stated |
| 10 November 2017 | Bodø kirkelige fellesråd | Bodø kirkelige fellesråd - Rammeavtale elektrisk kraft for levering i 2019 og 2020 | value not stated |
| 5 October 2017 | Nesna kommune | Nesna kommune - Rammeavtale elektrisk kraft for perioden 2019 - 2021 | value not stated |
| 21 September 2017 | Alstahaug kommune | Alstahaug kommune - Rammeavtale elektrisk kraft for perioden 2019 - 2021 | value not stated |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 28 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 991854126
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.150)
- Size tier
- large
- Employees
- 35 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 9 October 2007 19 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.13 MNOK
- Business address
- Sjøfartsgata 3, 7714 STEINKJER
- Municipality
- Steinkjer rank 27 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.nte.no
- LEI
- 5493008XEWMEJM5R7G82 renews 26 June 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Nelly Sundfær Maske
- Chair of the board
- Christian Stav
- Board member
- Astrid Von Heimburg
- Board member
- Terje Helland Sakariassen
- Board member
- Anette Fornes
- Deputy member
- Inge Bartnes
- Deputy member
- Markus Tapani Anttila
- Deputy member
- Jørn Dyrkoren
- Auditor
- KPMG AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No known owner
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 29 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 29 | 25 | 24 | |
| Rank | 695 | 784 | 817 | |
| Operating margin | −1.9% | −3.3% | 0.5% | |
| Return on assets | −3.2% | −5.0% | 3.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 20.2% | 15.0% | 15.2% | |
| Current ratio | 1.53 | 2.16 | 1.46 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −14.0% | −1.0% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1,557.7 MNOK | 1,340.4 MNOK | 1,326.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −29.3 MNOK | −44.3 MNOK | 7.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −38.1 MNOK | −99.0 MNOK | −3.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | −30.1 MNOK | −81.8 MNOK | −2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 16.0 MNOK | 65.7 MNOK | 26.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 694.8 MNOK | 661.0 MNOK | 722.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 553.1 MNOK | 438.4 MNOK | 361.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 140.3 MNOK | 99.4 MNOK | 109.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 53.2 MNOK | −46.2 MNOK | −65.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 554.5 MNOK | 561.6 MNOK | 612.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 360.4 MNOK | 202.8 MNOK | 248.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 7076305.
Further
Similar companies
- GUDBRANDSDAL ENERGI AS index 35, rank 696 · compare
- TIBBER NORGE AS index 34, rank 707 · compare
- LYSE ENERGI AS index 28, rank 779 · compare
- STATKRAFT AS index 26, rank 804 · compare
- MIND ENERGY AS index 25, rank 809 · compare