GREENZONE AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
20of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 11 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 1,426 of 1,571 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 11 and solidity 0 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
GREENZONE AS is 29 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 1,302 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −207.3% (median 10.9%) and equity ratio −47.2% (median 38.2%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −207.3% | 10.9% |
| Profit margin | −204.0% | 2.1% |
| Return on assets | −19.1% | 0.4% |
| Equity ratio | −47.2% | 38.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.06 |
| Current ratio | 2.92 | 1.67 |
| Revenue growth | −94.2% | 0.8% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 20, GREENZONE AS does better than 11% of small companies in the same sector (1,315 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- GREENZONE AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
GREENZONE AS has a score of 20 for 2025, rank 1,426 of 1,571 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 65 against peers, current ratio 2.92 against a median of 1.67.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −47.2% against a median of 38.2%. Growth: percentile 2 against peers, revenue growth −94.2% against a median of 0.8%.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −47.2% (median 38.2%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −204.0% (median 2.1%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −207.3% (median 10.9%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
GREENZONE AS had an operating margin of −207.3% and an equity ratio of −47.2% in 2025, and ranks 1,426 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 33.7% to −207.3% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.
GREENZONE AS did weaker than the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −47.2% (median 38.2%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −204.0% (median 2.1%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −207.3% (median 10.9%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.8% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was −207.3% in 2025 (sector median 12.6%), and the equity ratio −47.2%. The company had a loss before tax that year. In the other years the operating margin averaged 45.1%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 12.6%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 11 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 65 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 2 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 45 | weight 15% |
Durability: 42 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is GREENZONE AS?
The operating margin was −207.3% in 2025, against a median of 10.9% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −19.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is GREENZONE AS?
The equity ratio was −47.2% in 2025 (median 38.2%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of GREENZONE AS like?
The current ratio was 2.92 in 2025 (median 1.67).
How does GREENZONE AS compare in Kraft og energi?
GREENZONE AS ranks 1,426 of 1,571 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 1,169 of 1,315. Revenue changed by −94.2% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 995542374
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.123)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 23 April 2010 16 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Skøyen Atrium, Drammensveien 147, 0277 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 106–282 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 3 January 2019
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.greenzone.no
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Andries Adrianus De Wit
- Chair of the board
- Andries Adrianus De Wit
- Accountant
- SON REGNSKAP AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 45 | 60 | 20 | |
| Rank | 833 | 401 | 1,426 | |
| Operating margin | 56.5% | 33.7% | −207.3% | |
| Return on assets | 52.9% | 96.4% | −19.1% | |
| Equity ratio | −112.6% | −18.5% | −47.2% | |
| Current ratio | 2.70 | 3.49 | 2.92 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 142.9% | −94.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.4 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.4 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.3 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Equity | −0.4 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.5 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 7159873.
Further
Similar companies
- KVANNVATN KRAFT AS index 20, rank 1,423 · compare
- SVARTNAKKEN AS index 20, rank 1,424 · compare
- ENERGEIA BOLSTADMARKA AS index 20, rank 1,425 · compare
- RÅ KRAFT AS index 20, rank 1,427 · compare
- GEILANE Q AS index 20, rank 1,428 · compare