Lambda Networks AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2023
53of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 54 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 1,965 of 4,300 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 2,984 of 6,515 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 18 and resilience 94 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
Lambda Networks AS is 3 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 50 among 4,298 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023: operating margin −57.6% (median 6.0%) and equity ratio 90.2% (median 40.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −57.6% | 6.0% |
| Profit margin | −9.9% | 6.3% |
| Return on assets | −1.3% | 11.4% |
| Equity ratio | 90.2% | 40.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.11 | 1.10 |
| Current ratio | 3.67 | 1.57 |
| Revenue growth | – | 0.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 53, Lambda Networks AS does better than 54% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (4,300 companies) in 2023.
Score 2023–2025
- Lambda Networks AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
182 days | 55 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−9.2% | −8.6% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
77.0% | 55.3% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−29.2 | 8.1 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.3% | 0.5% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 0.0% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.9 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.2 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
What the numbers say
Lambda Networks AS had an operating margin of −57.6% and an equity ratio of 90.2% in 2023, and ranks 2,984 of 6,515 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 132 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 132 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 3% on the cost of equity gives a value 32% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −29.2 (median 8.1); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.3% (median 0.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −9.9% (median 6.3%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −57.6% (median 6.0%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 182 days (median 55 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.3% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 18 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 95 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 82 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 97 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Lambda Networks AS?
The operating margin was −57.6% in 2023, against a median of 6.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −1.3%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Lambda Networks AS?
The equity ratio was 90.2% in 2023 (median 40.4%). Debt-to-equity was 0.11 (median 1.10).
What is the liquidity of Lambda Networks AS like?
The current ratio was 3.67 in 2023 (median 1.57).
How does Lambda Networks AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Lambda Networks AS ranks 2,984 of 6,515 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2023. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 1,965 of 4,300.
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Henes AS.
Henes AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company), Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Lambda Networks AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Henes AS
- Lambda Networks AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 996233308
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 19 November 2010 15 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.25 MNOK
- Business address
- Bygg 8, Sagveien 23C, 0459 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.lambdanetworks.no
- LEI
- 254900XRSAN1TIAHP156 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 8 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- Parent not reported
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Henes AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: Henes AS
- Henes AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 53 | 79 | 38 | |
| Rank | 2,984 | 269 | 5,399 | |
| Operating margin | −57.6% | 13.4% | −5.1% | |
| Return on assets | −1.3% | 14.3% | −0.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 90.2% | 75.4% | 82.9% | |
| Current ratio | 3.67 | 4.37 | 16.37 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 632.5% | −50.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9.8 MNOK | 72.0 MNOK | 35.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −5.7 MNOK | 9.7 MNOK | −1.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.0 MNOK | 11.0 MNOK | −3.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.2 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | −0.7 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.8 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | −2.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 59.5 MNOK | 82.7 MNOK | 72.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 21.3 MNOK | 43.5 MNOK | 31.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 53.7 MNOK | 62.3 MNOK | 59.9 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 53.5 MNOK | 62.1 MNOK | 59.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 5.8 MNOK | 20.3 MNOK | 12.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 5.8 MNOK | 10.0 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 5187679.
Further
Similar companies
- Skald AS index 53, rank 2,979 · compare
- Skolevisjoner AS index 53, rank 2,980 · compare
- Catalyst AS index 53, rank 2,982 · compare
- Kraft AI AS index 53, rank 2,983 · compare
- Making Code AS index 53, rank 2,988 · compare