EAM SOLAR AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
32of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 17 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 370 of 448 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 749 of 878 · Kraft og energi
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 6 and solidity 51 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
EAM SOLAR AS is 18 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 448 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −641.9% (median 16.9%) and equity ratio 41.1% (median 38.4%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −641.9% | 16.9% |
| Profit margin | −394.5% | 3.4% |
| Return on assets | −6.2% | 3.8% |
| Equity ratio | 41.1% | 38.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.43 | 1.39 |
| Current ratio | 24.77 | 1.94 |
| Revenue growth | −74.4% | 1.8% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 32, EAM SOLAR AS does better than 17% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (448 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- EAM SOLAR AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
EAM SOLAR AS has a score of 32 for 2025, rank 749 of 878 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 98 against peers, current ratio 24.77 against a median of 1.94.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 1 against peers, revenue growth −74.4% against a median of 1.8%. Profitability: percentile 6 against peers, operating margin −641.9% against a median of 16.9%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −394.5% (median 3.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −641.9% (median 16.9%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
EAM SOLAR AS had an operating margin of −641.9% and an equity ratio of 41.1% in 2025, and ranks 749 of 878 in Kraft og energi.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −247.8% to −641.9% and revenue fell by 74%.
EAM SOLAR AS did weaker than the sector in 2025, the sector's weakest year.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 46 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 46 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −394.5% (median 3.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −641.9% (median 16.9%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
The operating margin was −641.9% in 2025 (sector median 15.7%), and the equity ratio 41.1%. The company had a loss before tax that year. In the other years the operating margin averaged −128.4%.
The sector's weakest year was 2025, with a median operating margin of 15.7%. Based on the 5 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 6 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 51 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 98 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 1 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 21 | weight 15% |
Durability: 38 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is EAM SOLAR AS?
The operating margin was −641.9% in 2025, against a median of 16.9% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −6.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is EAM SOLAR AS?
The equity ratio was 41.1% in 2025 (median 38.4%). Debt-to-equity was 1.43 (median 1.39).
What is the liquidity of EAM SOLAR AS like?
The current ratio was 24.77 in 2025 (median 1.94).
How does EAM SOLAR AS compare in Kraft og energi?
EAM SOLAR AS ranks 749 of 878 in Kraft og energi for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 370 of 448. Revenue changed by −74.4% from the year before.
Group accounts · 2025
21 of 100
Rank 100 of 104 groups in Kraft og energi. Groups are ranked only against other groups in the same sector, never against single companies.
- Operating revenue, group
- 1 MEUR
- ≈ 17 MNOK at Norges Bank's rate for the period
- Operating profit, group
- −1 MEUR
- ≈ −13 MNOK at Norges Bank's rate for the period
- Profit before tax, group
- −1 MEUR
- ≈ −12 MNOK at Norges Bank's rate for the period
- Total assets, group
- 11 MEUR
- ≈ 134 MNOK at Norges Bank's rate for the period
- Equity, group
- 1 MEUR
- ≈ 13 MNOK at Norges Bank's rate for the period
The group accounts are in EUR. Amounts are shown in EUR, with NOK below. Ratios are computed in EUR.
| Key figure | The group | The company alone (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | −80.2% | −641.9% |
| Return on assets | −8.9% | −6.2% |
| Equity ratio | 9.7% | 41.1% |
| Current ratio | 5.73 | 24.77 |
| Revenue growth | −5.6% | −74.4% |
Group index in earlier years: 2023: 11 (109 of 110), 2024: 29 (99 of 108).
Same formulas and weights as the company index. Group and company are never added together, and the group accounts are not part of sector averages or company rankings.
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre, group accounts 2025 (open data, NLOD 2.0).
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 996411265
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Kraft og energi (35.123)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 5 January 2011 15 years in operation
- Share capital
- 71.16 MNOK
- Business address
- Karenslyst allé 10, 0278 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 5967007LIEEXZXIPFC54 renews 21 November 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Erik Brandon Reisenfeld
- Chair of the board
- Viktor Erik Jakobsen
- Board member
- Pål Hvammen
- Board member
- Kurt Oddvar Austrått
- Board member
- Flemming Helgeland
- Board member
- Stig Roar Myrseth
- Auditor
- CEDRA NORGE AS
- Accountant
- ECIT SERVICES AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 46 | 34 | 32 | |
| Rank | 493 | 701 | 749 | |
| Operating margin | −9.0% | −247.8% | −641.9% | |
| Return on assets | 44.4% | −0.3% | −6.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 65.8% | 37.8% | 41.1% | |
| Current ratio | 0.68 | 8.72 | 24.77 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −47.4% | −74.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 13.3 MNOK | 7.0 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −1.2 MNOK | −17.4 MNOK | −11.5 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −28.1 MNOK | −4.0 MNOK | −7.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | −30.6 MNOK | −4.6 MNOK | −7.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 50.0 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 49.3 MNOK | 110.8 MNOK | 112.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 4.0 MNOK | 48.2 MNOK | 49.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 32.5 MNOK | 41.9 MNOK | 46.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −36.1 MNOK | 20.4 MNOK | 19.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 16.8 MNOK | 68.9 MNOK | 66.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 5.9 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 7224716.
Further
Similar companies
- LOCUS HYDRO 3 AS index 33, rank 744 · compare
- SAGELVA KRAFTVERK AS index 33, rank 745 · compare
- BELE KRAFT AS index 33, rank 748 · compare
- HYNNA KRAFT AS index 32, rank 750 · compare
- GRÅKLUBBEN KRAFTVERK AS index 32, rank 752 · compare