Infact AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 3.4% Weaker than the industry Industry: 5.8%
- Returns · return on assets 5.0% Weaker than the industry Industry: 14.0%
- Solidity · equity ratio 6.0% Weaker than the industry Industry: 33.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 4.89 Better than the industry Industry: 1.43
- Growth · revenue growth 49.9% Better than the industry Industry: 8.6%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
45of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 37 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 1,198 of 1,908 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,196 of 10,060 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 36 and resilience 23 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Infact AS is 6 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,907 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 3.4% (median 5.8%) and equity ratio 6.0% (median 33.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 53 % from 2023 to 2025, to 16.7 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −9.1% in 2023 to 3.4% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 45.5% in 2023 to 6.0% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10.9 MNOK | 11.1 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −1.0 MNOK | −2.1 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.0 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 5.8 MNOK | 11.0 MNOK | 13.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.7 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.2 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 12.4 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 997906314
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (73.200)
- Purpose
- Utvikle å selge data/telefoni/IT løsninger, data/telefoni/IT konsulent tjenester samt annen virksomhet som naturlig faller inn under dette.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 7.1 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 19 January 2012 14 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.07 MNOK
- Business address
- Strandveien 55, 1366 LYSAKER (BÆRUM)
- Municipality
- Bærum rank 1 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.ngdialogue.no
- Former names
- Ng-Dialogue AS until 2025, Lifevision AS until 2019
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Infact AS has a score of 45 for 2025, rank 6,196 of 10,060 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 96 against peers, current ratio 4.89 against a median of 1.43. Growth: percentile 89 against peers, revenue growth 49.9% against a median of 8.6%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 11 against peers, equity ratio 6.0% against a median of 33.0%. Consistency: percentile 13 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 6.0% (median 33.0%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 149 days (median 65 days).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 6.0% (median 33.0%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 149 days (median 65 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 36 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 11 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 96 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 89 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 13 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 28 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 17 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 5.8% |
| Profit margin | 2.9% | 5.9% |
| Return on assets | 5.0% | 14.0% |
| Equity ratio | 6.0% | 33.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 15.64 | 1.77 |
| Current ratio | 4.89 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | 49.9% | 8.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 45, Infact AS does better than 37% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,908 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Infact AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
149 days | 65 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
31.4% | −5.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
12.1% | 41.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
3.0 | 15.3 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.5% | 0.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 12.6% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 5.2 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.2 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Infact AS rose by 22.2 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 21.6 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Infact AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −18.8% | 5.2% | −9.7 percentage points | −0.3 percentage points | −9.4 percentage points |
| 2025 | 3.4% | 5.8% | +22.2 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +21.6 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Infact AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Infact AS rose 22.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Infact AS had an operating margin of 3.4% and an equity ratio of 6.0% in 2025, and ranks 6,196 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −18.8% to 3.4% and went from a loss to a profit before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 2 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 4.1 | 2 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (73): Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Infact AS?
The operating margin was 3.4% in 2025, against a median of 5.8% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 5.0%.
How solid is Infact AS?
The equity ratio was 6.0% in 2025 (median 33.0%). Debt-to-equity was 15.64 (median 1.77).
What is the liquidity of Infact AS like?
The current ratio was 4.89 in 2025 (median 1.43).
How does Infact AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Infact AS ranks 6,196 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 1,198 of 1,908. Revenue changed by 49.9% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kontali Analyse AS |  Elephant |
32 MNOK | −17.4% | 32 |
| Respons Analyse AS |  Beaver |
28 MNOK | 1.6% | 42 |
| Respons Fakta AS | Elephant |
23 MNOK | 2.5% | 56 |
| Sponsor Insight AS | Elephant |
20 MNOK | 1.7% | 49 |
| Infact AS (this company) | Beaver |
17 MNOK | 3.4% | 45 |
| Sentio Research Norge AS |  Cheetah |
16 MNOK | 9.9% | 58 |
| Yougov Norway AS | Beaver |
11 MNOK | −2.9% | 20 |
| Norfakta Markedsanalyse AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | −4.3% | 28 |
| Dmr-Dahl Market Research AS |  Lion |
8 MNOK | 26.5% | 72 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Zetare Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Zetare Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company), Overnatting og servering (1 company) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Zetare Holding AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Zetare Holding AS
- Infact AS you are here
- Wohali AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 8 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 3 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 98.5%
- Split
- companies 99% · private persons 1% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 99%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Zetare Holding AS (98%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Zetare Holding AS (holds 98%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Zetare Holding AS · 98.5%
- Ringsrud AS · 0.5%
- 1 private persons · 1.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 25 | 14 | 45 | |
| Rank | 7,580 | 9,159 | 6,196 | |
| Operating margin | −9.1% | −18.8% | 3.4% | |
| Return on assets | −16.7% | −18.2% | 5.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 45.5% | 13.9% | 6.0% | |
| Current ratio | 0.95 | 0.36 | 4.89 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 2.3% | 49.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10.9 MNOK | 11.1 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −1.0 MNOK | −2.1 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −1.1 MNOK | −2.2 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.2 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.0 MNOK | −1.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 5.8 MNOK | 11.0 MNOK | 13.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.0 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 7.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.7 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −3.0 MNOK | −4.1 MNOK | −4.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.2 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 12.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 3.2 MNOK | 9.5 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 7096727.
Further
Similar companies
- Trosvik Group AS index 45, rank 6,175 · compare
- Klarit Solution AS index 45, rank 6,186 · compare
- Relevant AS index 45, rank 6,197 · compare
- Profil Grafisk AS index 45, rank 6,205 · compare
- Exalto Decca Wiper Technologies AS index 45, rank 6,207 · compare