Commeo AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
43of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 34 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,470 of 5,281 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 4,359 of 6,603 · Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 60 and resilience 24 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Commeo AS is 8 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 5,279 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 0.8% (median 11.4%) and equity ratio 9.1% (median 44.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 10 % from 2023 to 2025, to 3.6 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 8.3% in 2023 to 0.8% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 53.7% in 2023 to 9.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Commeo AS has a score of 43 for 2025, rank 4,359 of 6,603 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 60 against peers, operating margin 0.8% against a median of 11.4%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 14 against peers, equity ratio 9.1% against a median of 44.0%. Liquidity: percentile 22 against peers, current ratio 1.08 against a median of 1.68.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 9.1% (median 44.0%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin 0.8% (median 11.4%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 737 days (median 52 days).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 9.1% (median 44.0%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 0.8% (median 11.4%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 737 days (median 52 days).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −13.1% (median −7.1%); Current ratio 1.08 (median 1.68).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.4%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 60 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 14 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 22 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 44 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 44 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 45 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 4 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 0.8% | 11.4% |
| Profit margin | 193.3% | 12.4% |
| Return on assets | 81.7% | 18.5% |
| Equity ratio | 9.1% | 44.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 9.93 | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.68 |
| Revenue growth | 6.9% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 43, Commeo AS does better than 34% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (5,281 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Commeo AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
737 days | 52 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−13.1% | −7.1% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
13.4% | 54.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
85.1 | 28.2 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.0% | 0.4% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 1.6% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Commeo AS fell by 3.3 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 2.9 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Commeo AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 19% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.1% | 11.8% | −4.2 percentage points | −1.0 percentage points | −3.2 percentage points |
| 2025 | 0.8% | 11.4% | −3.3 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | −2.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Commeo AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities rose 4.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: legal and accounting activities, annual average | 100.4 | 107.7 | 127.0 | 135.2 | 141.7 | 149.6 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +7.3% | +17.9% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: management consultancy (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: management consultancy rose 6.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: management consultancy, annual average | 99.4 | 104.0 | 114.9 | 116.0 | 123.6 | 128.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +17.3% | +4.6% | +10.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: legal and accounting (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: legal and accounting rose 4.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: legal and accounting, annual average | 100.0 | 104.8 | 111.8 | 117.4 | 123.2 | 127.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.4% | +4.8% | +6.7% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: legal and accounting (indeks)
Wage index: legal and accounting rose 5.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Commeo AS fell 3.3 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: legal and accounting, annual average | 86.2 | 89.8 | 93.9 | 99.1 | 104.4 | 108.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.1% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +5.6% | +5.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Commeo AS had an operating margin of 0.8% and an equity ratio of 9.1% in 2025, and ranks 4,359 of 6,603 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio fell from 47.1% to 9.1% and the operating margin fell from 4.1% to 0.8%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 2 MNOK and 33 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 33 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 3 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 3 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 2 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 3 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −72% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Commeo AS?
The operating margin was 0.8% in 2025, against a median of 11.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 81.7%.
How solid is Commeo AS?
The equity ratio was 9.1% in 2025 (median 44.0%). Debt-to-equity was 9.93 (median 1.09).
What is the liquidity of Commeo AS like?
The current ratio was 1.08 in 2025 (median 1.68).
How does Commeo AS compare in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning?
Commeo AS ranks 4,359 of 6,603 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,470 of 5,281. Revenue changed by 6.9% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brustind Invest AS |  Lion |
4 MNOK | 84.4% | 78 |
| Takova AS |  Beaver |
4 MNOK | −11.6% | 17 |
| Eigarskifter AS | Beaver |
4 MNOK | 3.3% | 39 |
| Fnp6 Kontorfellesskap AS | Beaver |
4 MNOK | 0.6% | 24 |
| Commeo AS (this company) |  Cheetah |
4 MNOK | 0.8% | 43 |
| Xbay Capital AS | Cheetah |
4 MNOK | 56.2% | 62 |
| Avarus AS | Cheetah |
4 MNOK | 60.1% | 65 |
| Levelup HR AS | Lion |
4 MNOK | 35.4% | 76 |
| Ergo Handel AS |  Elephant |
4 MNOK | 3.5% | 44 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 998239451
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (70.200)
- Purpose
- Yte konsulenttjenester rettet inn mot drift og utvikling av annen virksomhet, herunder utførende ingeniør- og driftstjenester samt tjenester tilknyttet ledelse, IKT og multimedia. Det skal i tillegg drive investeringsvirksomhet, eie aksjer eller delta i andre selskaper med tilsvarende eller lignende virksomhet og det som naturlig faller inn under dette.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 3.3 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 22 February 2012 14 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Dalegata 135, 6518 KRISTIANSUND N
- Municipality
- Kristiansund rank 17–26 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 16 April 2012
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.commeo.no
- LEI
- 549300Y28VQTDQITGC95 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 8 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Holds shares in: Climb Consulting AS (50%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 51 | 41 | 43 | |
| Rank | 3,003 | 4,421 | 4,359 | |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | |
| Return on assets | 14.9% | 9.3% | 81.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 53.7% | 47.1% | 9.1% | |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 1.91 | 1.08 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 3.4% | 6.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.2 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 3.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.9 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 8.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 8.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.0 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 7.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.6 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 7.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 6340167.
Further
Similar companies
- Finans Fokus AS index 43, rank 4,355 · compare
- Kaugerud Regnskapskontor AS index 43, rank 4,356 · compare
- Norsk Kystkulturakademi AS index 43, rank 4,357 · compare
- Advokatfirma Ebt AS index 43, rank 4,358 · compare
- Aanerød Konsulentene AS index 43, rank 4,360 · compare