Gipling Eiendom AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 43.5% About like the industry Industry: 47.7%
- Returns · return on assets 2.8% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 1.7% Weaker than the industry Industry: 27.9%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.45 About like the industry Industry: 1.40
- Growth · revenue growth −27.8% Weaker than the industry Industry: 3.3%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
24of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 8 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 22,045 of 23,899 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 27,888 of 30,124 · Eiendom
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 33 and resilience 26 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Gipling Eiendom AS is 26 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 23,893 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 43.5% (median 47.7%) and equity ratio 1.7% (median 27.9%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 76 % from 2023 to 2025, to 6.2 MNOK. The operating margin rose from 38.0% in 2023 to 43.5% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 0.4% in 2023 to 1.7% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.5 MNOK | 8.7 MNOK | 6.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.3 MNOK | 5.8 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.1 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 31.9 MNOK | 31.7 MNOK | 31.5 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 31.8 MNOK | 29.6 MNOK | 30.9 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 999129749
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Kjøp og salg av fast eiendom, samt utleie og annet som naturlig hører sammen med dette.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 5 registered 10 September 2026
- Founded
- 31 October 2012 14 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Trøavegen 41, 7716 STEINKJER
- Municipality
- Steinkjer rank 27 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Gipling Eiendom AS has a score of 24 for 2025, rank 27,888 of 30,124 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 51 against peers, current ratio 1.45 against a median of 1.40.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 9 against peers, revenue growth −27.8% against a median of 3.3%. Solidity: percentile 9 against peers, equity ratio 1.7% against a median of 27.9%.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 1.7% (median 27.9%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 23.9 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −23.1, the industry +0.7 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 1.7% (median 27.9%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 33 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 9 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 51 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 9 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 48 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 40 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 43.5% | 47.7% |
| Profit margin | 14.1% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 2.8% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 1.7% | 27.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 57.54 | 2.10 |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | 1.40 |
| Revenue growth | −27.8% | 3.3% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.25 MNOK | 0.59 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 24, Gipling Eiendom AS does better than 8% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (23,899 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Gipling Eiendom AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
20 days | 40 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−34.9% | −12.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
90.5% | 54.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 1.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
– | 5.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 87.8% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −2.2 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
51.8% | 12.0% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
9.4% | 7.8% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
11.0% | 19.5% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
0.20 | 0.16 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
58.54 | 3.09 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
– | 6.9 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
– | 1.01 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
1.45 | 1.24 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
22.2% | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
1.9 | 1.4 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
16.6% | 12.5% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
72.4% | 81.7% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 10 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 11.0% × asset turnover 0.20 × multiplier 58.54 = 127.5% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell by 23.1 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 23.9 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Gipling Eiendom AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 66.6% | 46.9% | +28.6 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +27.7 percentage points |
| 2025 | 43.5% | 47.7% | −23.1 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | −23.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell 23.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell 23.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell 23.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell 23.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Gipling Eiendom AS fell 23.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Gipling Eiendom AS had an operating margin of 43.5% and an equity ratio of 1.7% in 2025, and ranks 27,888 of 30,124 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 66.6% to 43.5% and revenue fell by 28%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 17 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The methods differ widely (the highest is 181.4 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 170,000 NOK per share, on 100 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 42 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | 8 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | 42 MNOK |
| P/B | 0.7 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 63 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 39 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −3 MNOK |
| Equity value | 42 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Personnel cost per employee
- 0.21 MNOK per employee in 2025
Comparable companies have a median of 0.26 MNOK. This company is above 42% of them (611 companies in the same industry and size class).
Payroll costs are 17% of revenue.
Payroll costs in the accounts divided by 5 employees in the business register. Payroll costs include employer's contribution and pension, so they are higher than wages. The employee count is a snapshot and can differ from the average over the accounting year. - Equity paid out or paid in
- 2.3 MNOK left equity beyond the result in 2025.
That equals 329% of the year's result.
More left than the company earned in the year.
Over 2 years it equals 88% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- Several signs that a generation change may be coming.
- The chair is 60 or older.
- The managing director is 60 or older.
- 1 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Gipling Eiendom AS?
The operating margin was 43.5% in 2025, against a median of 47.7% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 2.8%.
How solid is Gipling Eiendom AS?
The equity ratio was 1.7% in 2025 (median 27.9%). Debt-to-equity was 57.54 (median 2.10).
What is the liquidity of Gipling Eiendom AS like?
The current ratio was 1.45 in 2025 (median 1.40).
How does Gipling Eiendom AS compare in Eiendom?
Gipling Eiendom AS ranks 27,888 of 30,124 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 22,045 of 23,899. Revenue changed by −27.8% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elvegata Holding AS |  Beaver |
6 MNOK | −0.7% | 37 |
| Finnmin Eiendom AS |  Lion |
6 MNOK | 92.9% | 82 |
| Fløgo Eiendom AS | Lion |
6 MNOK | 63.5% | 75 |
| Ares Eiendom AS |  Cheetah |
6 MNOK | 37.9% | 53 |
| Havila Mjølstadneset AS | Lion |
6 MNOK | 66.5% | 48 |
| G Eiendom AS | Cheetah |
6 MNOK | 21.2% | 52 |
| Gipling Eiendom AS (this company) | Beaver |
6 MNOK | 43.5% | 24 |
| Øse Camping AS | Cheetah |
6 MNOK | 17.4% | 40 |
| Buråsen 11 AS | Lion |
6 MNOK | 57.2% | 70 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Steget Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Steget Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (2 companies) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 5 in all. Steinkjer 5 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
-
Steget Holding AS
- Gipling Eiendom AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Steget Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Steget Holding AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 8 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 29 | 68 | 24 | |
| Rank | 22,571 | 3,801 | 27,888 | |
| Operating margin | 38.0% | 66.6% | 43.5% | |
| Return on assets | 4.3% | 18.2% | 2.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 0.4% | 6.7% | 1.7% | |
| Current ratio | 5.05 | 3.65 | 1.45 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 143.7% | −27.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.5 MNOK | 8.7 MNOK | 6.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.3 MNOK | 5.8 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.1 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.2 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | – |
| Total assets | 31.9 MNOK | 31.7 MNOK | 31.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.0 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 31.8 MNOK | 29.6 MNOK | 30.9 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 8 November 2026, accounts id 7110125.
Further
Similar companies
- Fonna Eigedom AS index 24, rank 27,884 · compare
- Its Pro AS index 24, rank 27,885 · compare
- Måløy Bygg AS index 24, rank 27,886 · compare
- Lynnebakka 5-7 AS index 24, rank 27,887 · compare
- Jonstadveien 6 AS index 24, rank 27,889 · compare