LØVAAS BYGG AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
51of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 52 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 15,792 of 32,580 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 13 and solidity 92 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
LØVAAS BYGG AS is 1 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 31,470 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −46.5% (median 3.7%) and equity ratio 94.7% (median 36.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −46.5% | 3.7% |
| Profit margin | −36.5% | 3.4% |
| Return on assets | −10.0% | 5.7% |
| Equity ratio | 94.7% | 36.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.06 | 1.20 |
| Current ratio | 10.07 | 1.45 |
| Revenue growth | −28.4% | 3.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 51, LØVAAS BYGG AS does better than 52% of small companies in the same sector (31,718 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- LØVAAS BYGG AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
LØVAAS BYGG AS has a score of 51 for 2025, rank 15,792 of 32,580 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 92 against peers, current ratio 10.07 against a median of 1.45. Solidity: percentile 92 against peers, equity ratio 94.7% against a median of 36.5%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 13 against peers, operating margin −46.5% against a median of 3.7%. Growth: percentile 17 against peers, revenue growth −28.4% against a median of 3.0%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −36.5% (median 3.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −46.5% (median 3.7%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
LØVAAS BYGG AS had an operating margin of −46.5% and an equity ratio of 94.7% in 2025, and ranks 15,792 of 32,580 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −31.2% to −46.5% and revenue fell by 28%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 1 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −36.5% (median 3.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −46.5% (median 3.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 13 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 92 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 92 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 17 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 50 | weight 15% |
Durability: 59 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is LØVAAS BYGG AS?
The operating margin was −46.5% in 2025, against a median of 3.7% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −10.0%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is LØVAAS BYGG AS?
The equity ratio was 94.7% in 2025 (median 36.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.06 (median 1.20).
What is the liquidity of LØVAAS BYGG AS like?
The current ratio was 10.07 in 2025 (median 1.45).
How does LØVAAS BYGG AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
LØVAAS BYGG AS ranks 15,792 of 32,580 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 15,262 of 31,718. Revenue changed by −28.4% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 999247156
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (41.000)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 4 November 2012 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Torstein Løvaas, Kleivkroken 3, 6443 TORNES I ROMSDAL (HUSTADVIKA)
- Municipality
- Hustadvika rank 12–22 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 10 December 2012
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 254900NR6YSF4PO8MS24 renews 1 July 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Torstein Løvaas
- Chair of the board
- Torstein Løvaas
- Accountant
- SPAREBANK 1 REGNSKAPSHUSET SMN AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 29 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 75 | 52 | 51 | |
| Rank | 3,506 | 14,718 | 15,792 | |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | −31.2% | −46.5% | |
| Return on assets | 3.6% | −8.4% | −10.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 89.0% | 92.2% | 94.7% | |
| Current ratio | 5.26 | 7.02 | 10.07 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −45.1% | −28.4% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.1 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.9 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.7 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.6 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 6405213.
Further
Similar companies
- ANDREASSEN BYGG OG SERVICE AS index 51, rank 15,790 · compare
- BYGDASNEKKER'N AS index 51, rank 15,791 · compare
- SVEIN LITLESKARE MASKINSTASJON AS index 51, rank 15,793 · compare
- MNA TAKSERVICE AS index 51, rank 15,794 · compare
- NORGESHUS TVEDESTRAND AS index 51, rank 15,795 · compare