Supplier assessment

Acea Development AS

Org. no. 811607002 · Eiendom · BODØ · 6 employees

Not financial advice. The assessment is based on open data and fixed rules. It does not replace your own checks of the supplier, a credit report or the requirements of procurement law. Read more

Grade A Very solid basis

Points85 of 100, weighted

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, register status, announcements, change of owners and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Other things we checked

What credit agencies look at beyond the accounts, as far as open data goes.

Watch: The equity ratio changed by −24.4 pp from 2023 to 2025.
Strength: The parent Acea Properties AS has an equity ratio of 55.6%.

These took off 5 points.

Red flags

High: The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Watch: Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Watch: The profit was tied up in working capital instead of turning into cash (rough indication).

Made by fixed rules from the latest accounts, the Register of Business Enterprises and the number check. A list of things to examine, not a credit rating.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

Acea Development AS gets grade A on the figures.

The accounts show good solidity and liquidity, and the figures give a buyer little cause for concern.

Strengths

The equity ratio is 60.1%, which gives a good buffer against losses.
The current ratio is 2.43: current assets cover current liabilities well.
The parent Acea Properties AS has an equity ratio of 55.6%.

Risks

The equity ratio changed by −24.4 pp from 2023 to 2025.

Questions to ask

Ask for references from similar assignments.
Check payment remarks and ask for a tax certificate; open data cannot show these.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	100	30 %	Equity ratio 60.1%
Liquidity	100	20 %	Current ratio 2.43
Profitability	76	20 %	Operating margin 1.4%
Size and capacity	70	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets points from 0 to 100, and the points are weighted. Between the thresholds the points run smoothly, so a company with 38 % equity gets nearly the same as one with 40 %, not a whole step less. A missing area is left out and its weight shared among the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 0 % gives 25 points, 10 % gives 45, 20 % gives 65, 30 % gives 85 and 40 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. Negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 0.5 gives 10 points, 0.8 gives 40, 1.0 gives 55, 1.2 gives 70, 1.5 gives 85 and 2.0 or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating and profit margin. 0 % gives 55 points, 5 % gives 80 and 10 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. A negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest Doffin contract against revenue. Under 10 % gives 100 points, under 30 % gives 70, under 60 % gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts revenue counts: 1 MNOK gives 50, 10 MNOK gives 70, 50 MNOK gives 85 and 1,000 MNOK or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more gives 100 points, 3 gives 85 and 1 gives 65. Contracts from at least three different buyers give 10 points extra. No contracts do not count: many sound companies do not sell to the public sector, so the area is left out and its weight shared among the rest.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.