Acea Development AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 1.4% Weaker than the industry Industry: 40.6%
- Returns · return on assets 2.4% Weaker than the industry Industry: 7.8%
- Solidity · equity ratio 60.1% Better than the industry Industry: 27.3%
- Liquidity · current ratio 2.43 Better than the industry Industry: 1.27
- Growth · revenue growth 49.2% Better than the industry Industry: 4.1%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
45of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 36 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 3,290 of 5,128 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 18,904 of 30,124 · Eiendom
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 16 and resilience 58 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Acea Development AS is 5 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 5,127 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 1.4% (median 40.6%) and equity ratio 60.1% (median 27.3%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 400 % from 2023 to 2025, to 10.0 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −202.9% in 2023 to 1.4% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 84.5% in 2023 to 60.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.0 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK | 10.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −4.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | −3.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 18.6 MNOK | 23.4 MNOK | 42.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 15.7 MNOK | 16.0 MNOK | 25.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.9 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 17.0 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 811607002
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Eiendom (68.200)
- Purpose
- Investeringsvirksomhet, herunder å investere i andre virksomheter gjennom aksjer eller på annen måte, samt investering i og utleie av fast eiendom samt virksomhet som naturlig faller inn under dette.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 6 registered 10 April 2025
- Founded
- 13 February 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.06 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Acea Properties AS, Sjøgata 3, 8006 BODØ
- Municipality
- Bodø rank 4–9 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Acea Development AS has a score of 45 for 2025, rank 18,904 of 30,124 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 78 against peers, equity ratio 60.1% against a median of 27.3%. Growth: percentile 73 against peers, revenue growth 49.2% against a median of 4.1%.
Weakest: Consistency: percentile 12 against peers. Profitability: percentile 16 against peers, operating margin 1.4% against a median of 40.6%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) 0.6 (median 2.0); financial costs as a share of debt 1.4% (median 4.7%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin 1.4% (median 40.6%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 594 days (median 50 days).
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) 0.6 (median 2.0); Financial costs as a share of debt 1.4% (median 4.7%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin 1.4% (median 40.6%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 594 days (median 50 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 15.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 16 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 78 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 71 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 73 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 12 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 41 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 17 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 1.4% | 40.6% |
| Profit margin | 7.7% | 19.3% |
| Return on assets | 2.4% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | 60.1% | 27.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.66 | 2.34 |
| Current ratio | 2.43 | 1.27 |
| Revenue growth | 49.2% | 4.1% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.67 MNOK | 2.14 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 45, Acea Development AS does better than 36% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (5,128 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Acea Development AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
594 days | 50 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
89.0% | −6.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
9.2% | 30.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
0.6 | 2.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.4% | 4.7% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
56.4% | 83.5% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 8.9 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.2 MNOK, 0.2 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
3.7% | 12.9% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
0.4% | 8.3% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
7.7% | 15.0% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
0.24 | 0.18 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
1.66 | 3.34 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
56.5 | 6.5 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
1.43 | 1.01 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
2.43 | 1.08 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
0.0% | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
– | 1.3 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
146.2% | 13.3% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
0.9% | 68.8% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 8 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 7.7% × asset turnover 0.24 × multiplier 1.66 = 3.0% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose by 3.4 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 6.3 points. So the company did 9.7 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Acea Development AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −2.0% | 46.9% | +201.0 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +200.1 percentage points |
| 2025 | 1.4% | 40.6% | +3.4 percentage points | −6.3 percentage points | +9.7 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Acea Development AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
House prices (existing homes) (indeks (2015 = 100))
House prices (existing homes) rose 5.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| House prices (existing homes), annual average | 134.5 | 141.6 | 140.8 | 144.6 | 152.5 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.5% | +5.2% | −0.5% | +2.7% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | – |
Source: SSB (07221, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Construction cost index for dwellings (indeks (2015 = 100))
Construction cost index for dwellings rose 4.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction cost index for dwellings, annual average | 124.2 | 135.1 | 141.1 | 146.4 | 152.7 | 158.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +8.8% | +4.4% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +3.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | – |
Source: SSB (08651, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: real estate (indeks)
Wage index: real estate rose 5.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Acea Development AS rose 3.4 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: real estate, annual average | 91.7 | 94.3 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 108.5 | 111.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Acea Development AS had an operating margin of 1.4% and an equity ratio of 60.1% in 2025, and ranks 18,904 of 30,124 in Eiendom.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 49% and the operating margin rose from −2.0% to 1.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 11 MNOK
The mean of the 1 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. Fewer than three methods gave a figure, so the mean is weaker than it looks.
That is about 367 NOK per share, on 30,000 shares in the shareholder register.
One method gives a figure: 11 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.5 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 19.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 0.7 | 11 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (68.2): R.E.I.T..
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Personnel cost per registered employee
- 2.45 MNOK per registered employee in 2025
Comparable companies have a median of 0.89 MNOK. This company is above 97% of them (784 companies in the same industry and size class).
Payroll costs are 146% of revenue.
Payroll costs in the accounts divided by 6 employees in the business register. Payroll costs include employer's contribution and pension, so they are higher than wages. The employee count is a snapshot and can differ from the average over the accounting year. - Implied dividend (net payout)
- Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Over 2 years it equals 0% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- One sign that a generation change may be coming.
- The chair is 60 or older.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 1 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
- What the largest owner can do alone
- The largest owner holds 100.0% of the shares, more than nine tenths. The owner is a company and can then buy out the other shareholders by compulsion (Norwegian Companies Act § 4-26), provided it also holds the corresponding share of the votes. Every other decision the owner can secure alone.
The owner is a Norwegian company.
Applies to the largest single owner in the shareholder register (2025). The articles can limit voting rights and owners can vote together, and we cannot see either. Ownership through other companies is not counted.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Acea Development AS?
The operating margin was 1.4% in 2025, against a median of 40.6% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 2.4%.
How solid is Acea Development AS?
The equity ratio was 60.1% in 2025 (median 27.3%). Debt-to-equity was 0.66 (median 2.34).
What is the liquidity of Acea Development AS like?
The current ratio was 2.43 in 2025 (median 1.27).
How does Acea Development AS compare in Eiendom?
Acea Development AS ranks 18,904 of 30,124 in Eiendom for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 3,290 of 5,128. Revenue changed by 49.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Døvleveien Eiendomsinvest AS |  Beaver |
10 MNOK | 46.1% | 52 |
| Siva Skjervøy Eiendom AS |  Elephant |
10 MNOK | 22.2% | 45 |
| AS KONGENSGT 4 |  Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 53.7% | 58 |
| Krohnåsveien Eiendom AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 98.5% | 55 |
| Acea Development AS (this company) | Elephant |
10 MNOK | 1.4% | 45 |
| Sandakerveien 22 AS |  Lion |
10 MNOK | 58.5% | 58 |
| Grenland Handelspark AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 79.1% | 52 |
| Olav Gulbrandsen AS | Beaver |
10 MNOK | 14.1% | 22 |
| Staven Næringseiendom AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 64.3% | 66 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
20 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Acea Properties AS.
Acea Properties AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (20 companies) 20 of 20 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 6 in all. Bodø 6 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Lillehammer Prosjektutvikling AS
- Loss
- 9 companies: Central Atrium AS, Posthusgården Bodø AS, Moloveien 10 AS, Tollbugata 9 AS, Moloveien 10 Holding AS, Sg1 Holding AS …
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company left: Skippergata 1-7 AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Acea Properties AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: Acea Properties AS
- Acea Properties AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Majority owner of: Tollbugata 9 AS (100%), Lillehammer Prosjektutvikling AS (100%)
The portfolio: 3 of the companies it owns shares in have accounts with us, 2 of them as majority owner. The average index is –. 2 have negative equity and 2 made a loss in the latest year.
Holds shares in: Lillehammer Prosjektutvikling AS (100%), Gostoso Eiendom AS (17%), Tollbugata 9 AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 29 | 50 | 45 | |
| Rank | 22,749 | 14,567 | 18,904 | |
| Operating margin | −202.9% | −2.0% | 1.4% | |
| Return on assets | −21.1% | 1.3% | 2.4% | |
| Equity ratio | 84.5% | 68.4% | 60.1% | |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 2.76 | 2.43 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 235.4% | 49.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.0 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK | 10.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −4.1 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −3.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −3.9 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 18.6 MNOK | 23.4 MNOK | 42.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.9 MNOK | 8.4 MNOK | 18.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 15.7 MNOK | 16.0 MNOK | 25.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −50.2 MNOK | −49.9 MNOK | −49.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.9 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK | 17.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.9 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 7.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 6546213.
Further
Similar companies
- Brynsengfaret 4 og 6 AS index 45, rank 18,890 · compare
- Mastemyr Hotell AS index 45, rank 18,899 · compare
- Hans Gaarder Eiendom AS index 45, rank 18,900 · compare
- Leva Jessheim Park AS index 45, rank 18,906 · compare
- Vervet Utleie AS index 45, rank 18,915 · compare