ML Plenum AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2023
41of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 40 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 2,265 of 3,751 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,602 of 5,792 · Overnatting og servering
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2023, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 35 and resilience 49 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. Methodology
Against the sector
ML Plenum AS is 8 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023.
Median score 49 among 3,748 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023: operating margin −0.8% (median 1.8%) and equity ratio 17.6% (median 14.2%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 8 MNOK | 5 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −0.8% | 1.8% |
| Profit margin | −0.9% | 1.2% |
| Return on assets | −3.9% | 5.2% |
| Equity ratio | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | 4.68 | 2.03 |
| Current ratio | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| Revenue growth | – | 2.8% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.24 MNOK | 0.43 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2023. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 41, ML Plenum AS does better than 40% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (3,751 companies) in 2023.
Score 2023–2025
- ML Plenum AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
What the numbers say
ML Plenum AS had an operating margin of −0.8% and an equity ratio of 17.6% in 2023, and ranks 3,602 of 5,792 in Overnatting og servering.
This text is generated automatically from the 2023 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.8 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 16.2 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.3 | 1 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (56): Restaurant/Dining.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.98 (median 1.00).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −0.9% (median 1.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.2% of the debt in 2023. The policy rate averaged 3.54 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 1.8%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 35 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 42 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 48 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 62 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is ML Plenum AS?
The operating margin was −0.8% in 2023, against a median of 1.8% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −3.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is ML Plenum AS?
The equity ratio was 17.6% in 2023 (median 14.2%). Debt-to-equity was 4.68 (median 2.03).
What is the liquidity of ML Plenum AS like?
The current ratio was 0.98 in 2023 (median 1.00). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does ML Plenum AS compare in Overnatting og servering?
ML Plenum AS ranks 3,602 of 5,792 in Overnatting og servering for 2023. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 2,265 of 3,751.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 820872622
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Overnatting og servering (56.110)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 32 registered 10 September 2026
- Founded
- 22 April 2018 8 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Vaterlandsveien 27, 3470 SLEMMESTAD (ASKER)
- Municipality
- Asker rank 2 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 31 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 41 | 60 | 52 | |
| Rank | 3,602 | 1,963 | 3,188 | |
| Operating margin | −0.8% | 3.2% | 2.0% | |
| Return on assets | −3.9% | 14.7% | 7.6% | |
| Equity ratio | 17.6% | 26.9% | 28.2% | |
| Current ratio | 0.98 | 1.15 | 1.18 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 17.7% | −0.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 7.6 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 8.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | −0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | – | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.6 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.3 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 4603585.
Further
Similar companies
- Verkskroa AS index 41, rank 3,599 · compare
- Kapadokya Restaurant Tønsberg AS index 41, rank 3,600 · compare
- Enga Pub AS index 41, rank 3,601 · compare
- Nye Beiarn Turistsenter AS index 41, rank 3,604 · compare
- Dds AS index 41, rank 3,605 · compare