Chezville AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
41of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 29 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 293 of 413 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,412 of 2,025 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 59 and solidity 12 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Chezville AS is 9 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 413 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 10.8% (median 5.2%) and equity ratio 3.9% (median 32.7%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 15 MNOK | 21 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 10.8% | 5.2% |
| Profit margin | 10.8% | 5.1% |
| Return on assets | 9.0% | 9.8% |
| Equity ratio | 3.9% | 32.7% |
| Debt-to-equity | 24.62 | 1.69 |
| Current ratio | 0.98 | 1.26 |
| Revenue growth | 43.0% | 8.2% |
| Revenue per employee | 2.43 MNOK | 1.92 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 41, Chezville AS does better than 29% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (413 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Chezville AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Chezville AS has a score of 41 for 2025, rank 1,412 of 2,025 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 85 against peers, revenue growth 43.0% against a median of 8.2%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 12 against peers, equity ratio 3.9% against a median of 32.7%. Consistency: percentile 21 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 3.9% (median 32.7%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.98 (median 1.26).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 43.0% (median 8.2%); current ratio 0.98 (median 1.26).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
Chezville AS had an operating margin of 10.8% and an equity ratio of 3.9% in 2025, and ranks 1,412 of 2,025 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −25.7% to 10.8% and went from a loss to a profit before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 17 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 12 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 17 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | 1 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 3.9% (median 32.7%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.98 (median 1.26).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 43.0% (median 8.2%); Current ratio 0.98 (median 1.26).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 59 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 12 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 28 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 85 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 21 | weight 15% |
Durability: 33 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Chezville AS?
The operating margin was 10.8% in 2025, against a median of 5.2% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 9.0%.
How solid is Chezville AS?
The equity ratio was 3.9% in 2025 (median 32.7%). Debt-to-equity was 24.62 (median 1.69).
What is the liquidity of Chezville AS like?
The current ratio was 0.98 in 2025 (median 1.26). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Chezville AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Chezville AS ranks 1,412 of 2,025 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 293 of 413. Revenue changed by 43.0% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 896860372
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (59.120)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 6 registered 10 January 2026
- Founded
- 15 March 2011 15 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Pedersgata 110, 4014 STAVANGER
- Municipality
- Stavanger rank 5 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 38 | 21 | 41 | |
| Rank | 1,401 | 1,884 | 1,412 | |
| Operating margin | −58.0% | −25.7% | 10.8% | |
| Return on assets | −66.0% | −53.7% | 9.0% | |
| Equity ratio | 46.1% | −11.2% | 3.9% | |
| Current ratio | 1.54 | 0.65 | 0.98 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 174.8% | 43.0% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3.7 MNOK | 10.2 MNOK | 14.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −2.2 MNOK | −2.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −2.2 MNOK | −2.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
| Net profit | −1.7 MNOK | −2.1 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 3.3 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 17.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.7 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 16.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.5 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 1.4 MNOK | −0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.8 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.8 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK | 16.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 6773138.
Further
Similar companies
- Get Academy AS index 41, rank 1,394 · compare
- Dekningspatruljen AS index 40, rank 1,424 · compare
- Mikon AS index 40, rank 1,426 · compare
- Truewest AS index 40, rank 1,433 · compare
- Grunt AS index 40, rank 1,439 · compare