Structor Geomiljø AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
61of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 71 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 480 of 1,642 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,669 of 5,554 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 88 and resilience 22 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Structor Geomiljø AS is 10 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,642 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 19.9% (median 5.6%) and equity ratio 7.7% (median 33.1%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 15 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 19.9% | 5.6% |
| Profit margin | 20.4% | 5.7% |
| Return on assets | 42.9% | 14.0% |
| Equity ratio | 7.7% | 33.1% |
| Debt-to-equity | 11.95 | 1.77 |
| Current ratio | 1.03 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | 16.9% | 8.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 61, Structor Geomiljø AS does better than 71% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,642 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Structor Geomiljø AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Structor Geomiljø AS has a score of 61 for 2025, rank 1,669 of 5,554 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 88 against peers, operating margin 19.9% against a median of 5.6%. Growth: percentile 70 against peers, revenue growth 16.9% against a median of 8.6%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 12 against peers, equity ratio 7.7% against a median of 33.1%. Liquidity: percentile 21 against peers, current ratio 1.03 against a median of 1.43.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 7.7% (median 33.1%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak liquidity, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 6.4 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +7.0, the industry +0.7 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose by 7.0 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.7 points. So the company did 6.4 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Structor Geomiljø AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 11% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12.8% | 4.9% | −2.8 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points | −2.4 percentage points |
| 2025 | 19.9% | 5.6% | +7.0 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Structor Geomiljø AS rose 7.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Structor Geomiljø AS had an operating margin of 19.9% and an equity ratio of 7.7% in 2025, and ranks 1,669 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 12.8% to 19.9% and the equity ratio fell from 23.2% to 7.7%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 23 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9 | 16 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.3 | 23 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.3 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 30 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 19 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −5 MNOK |
| Equity value | 23 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (71.1): Engineering/Construction.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 7.7% (median 33.1%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 88 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 12 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 21 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 70 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 43 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 59 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Structor Geomiljø AS?
The operating margin was 19.9% in 2025, against a median of 5.6% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 42.9%.
How solid is Structor Geomiljø AS?
The equity ratio was 7.7% in 2025 (median 33.1%). Debt-to-equity was 11.95 (median 1.77).
What is the liquidity of Structor Geomiljø AS like?
The current ratio was 1.03 in 2025 (median 1.43).
How does Structor Geomiljø AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Structor Geomiljø AS ranks 1,669 of 5,554 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 480 of 1,642. Revenue changed by 16.9% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 915079318
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (71.129)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 25 February 2015 11 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.50 MNOK
- Business address
- Engebrets vei 5, 0275 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.structor.no
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 4 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 55.0% · top three 95.0%
- Split
- companies 35% · private persons 65% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Owners over 60
- 85% of the shares held by persons (median age 60)
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
- Structor Holding AS · 35.0%
- 3 private persons · 65.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 31 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 58 | 59 | 61 | |
| Rank | 2,005 | 1,854 | 1,669 | |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 12.8% | 19.9% | |
| Return on assets | 30.3% | 32.3% | 42.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 23.0% | 23.2% | 7.7% | |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.03 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 30.6% | 16.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10.1 MNOK | 13.2 MNOK | 15.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.6 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.6 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Net profit | 1.3 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 5.4 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK | 7.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 5.1 MNOK | 5.3 MNOK | 7.0 MNOK |
| Equity | 1.2 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.7 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.2 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK | 6.8 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.2 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK | 6.8 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 31 October 2026, accounts id 6461135.
Further
Similar companies
- Alfa Øst AS index 61, rank 1,663 · compare
- Empet Larvik AS index 61, rank 1,667 · compare
- Olset Ksu AS index 61, rank 1,670 · compare
- Erithy AS index 61, rank 1,676 · compare
- Raufoss Automotive AS index 61, rank 1,680 · compare