Workplacedevelopers AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 13.2% About like the industry Industry: 11.4%
- Returns · return on assets 15.8% About like the industry Industry: 18.5%
- Solidity · equity ratio 19.4% Weaker than the industry Industry: 44.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.24 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.68
- Growth · revenue growth −55.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 6.5%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
31of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 16 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 4,427 of 5,282 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,565 of 6,602 · Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 49 and resilience 30 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Workplacedevelopers AS is 20 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 5,280 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 13.2% (median 11.4%) and equity ratio 19.4% (median 44.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 49 % from 2023 to 2025, to 3.1 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 47.1% in 2023 to 13.2% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 20.4% in 2023 to 19.4% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.0 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 2.8 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 2.2 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.5 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.5 MNOK | 4.7 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 915116221
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (70.200)
- Purpose
- Konsulentvirksomhet innen arbeidsmiljø og helse, personal- og organisasjonsutvikling, rådgivning og undervisning. Selskapet skal også kunne kjøpe, selge og forvalte aksjer, eiendommer eller andeler av slike, samt hva herved står i forbindelse. Selskapet kan også eie eller delta i andre virksomheter.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 1.9 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 12 January 2015 11 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Øvre Bakklandet 35, 7016 TRONDHEIM
- Municipality
- Trondheim rank 3 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 16 March 2015
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.wpd.no
- LEI
- 894500HAZ00GVYMOVQ63 renews 21 January 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Workplacedevelopers AS has a score of 31 for 2025, rank 5,565 of 6,602 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 49 against peers, operating margin 13.2% against a median of 11.4%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 4 against peers, revenue growth −55.2% against a median of 6.5%. Solidity: percentile 24 against peers, equity ratio 19.4% against a median of 44.0%.
Worth a closer look
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 210 days (median 52 days).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 35.2 percentage points weaker than for comparable companies: the company −35.7, the industry −0.4 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 210 days (median 52 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.5%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 49 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 24 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 32 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 4 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 41 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 49 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| Profit margin | 14.6% | 12.3% |
| Return on assets | 15.8% | 18.5% |
| Equity ratio | 19.4% | 44.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 4.17 | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.68 |
| Revenue growth | −55.2% | 6.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 31, Workplacedevelopers AS does better than 16% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (5,282 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Workplacedevelopers AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
210 days | 52 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
– | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−17.3% | −7.1% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
37.8% | 54.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
145.0 | 28.2 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.1% | 0.4% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 1.6% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
90.0% | 31.0% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
73.3% | 29.6% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
11.4% | 9.8% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
1.08 | 1.63 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
5.17 | 2.08 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
– | −1.0 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
– | 2.07 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
1.24 | 1.54 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
22.2% | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
1.6 | 1.5 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
60.7% | 58.5% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
17.8% | 23.2% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 23 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 11.4% × asset turnover 1.08 × multiplier 5.17 = 63.3% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell by 35.7 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 35.2 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Workplacedevelopers AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 4% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48.8% | 11.8% | +1.7 percentage points | −1.0 percentage points | +2.8 percentage points |
| 2025 | 13.2% | 11.4% | −35.7 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | −35.2 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: legal and accounting activities rose 4.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: legal and accounting activities, annual average | 100.4 | 107.7 | 127.0 | 135.2 | 141.7 | 149.6 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +8.7% | +7.3% | +17.9% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: management consultancy (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: management consultancy rose 6.5% in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: management consultancy, annual average | 99.4 | 104.0 | 114.9 | 116.0 | 123.6 | 128.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +17.3% | +4.6% | +10.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: legal and accounting (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: legal and accounting rose 4.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: legal and accounting, annual average | 100.0 | 104.8 | 111.8 | 117.4 | 123.2 | 127.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.4% | +4.8% | +6.7% | +5.0% | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: legal and accounting (indeks)
Wage index: legal and accounting rose 5.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Workplacedevelopers AS fell 35.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: legal and accounting, annual average | 86.2 | 89.8 | 93.9 | 99.1 | 104.4 | 108.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.1% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +5.6% | +5.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Workplacedevelopers AS had an operating margin of 13.2% and an equity ratio of 19.4% in 2025, and ranks 5,565 of 6,602 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 48.8% to 13.2% and revenue fell by 55%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 17 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The median of the methods is 24 MNOK. The mean is the suggested price, but the median is less sensitive to one method that deviates. The methods differ widely (the highest is 17.6 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 170,000 NOK per share, on 100 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 1 MNOK and 25 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 24 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 25 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 38 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 24 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 25 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Implied dividend (net payout)
- 0.0 MNOK left equity beyond the result in 2025.
That equals 6% of the year's result.
Over 2 years it equals 112% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
- The chair is under 60.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 0 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
- What the largest owner can do alone
- The largest owner holds 100.0% of the shares, more than nine tenths. The owner is a company and can then buy out the other shareholders by compulsion (Norwegian Companies Act § 4-26), provided it also holds the corresponding share of the votes. Every other decision the owner can secure alone.
The owner is a Norwegian company.
Applies to the largest single owner in the shareholder register (2025). The articles can limit voting rights and owners can vote together, and we cannot see either. Ownership through other companies is not counted. - Control against ownership through the chain
- A private person holds a majority at each of 2 links and so controls the company, but owns at least 100% of it itself.
The top owner is the highest we can establish, and it can itself be owned by others. The figure is «at least» because other routes between the owner and the company only add to it. The articles can limit voting rights, and we cannot see that. Shareholder register (2025).
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Workplacedevelopers AS?
The operating margin was 13.2% in 2025, against a median of 11.4% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 15.8%.
How solid is Workplacedevelopers AS?
The equity ratio was 19.4% in 2025 (median 44.0%). Debt-to-equity was 4.17 (median 1.09).
What is the liquidity of Workplacedevelopers AS like?
The current ratio was 1.24 in 2025 (median 1.68).
How does Workplacedevelopers AS compare in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning?
Workplacedevelopers AS ranks 5,565 of 6,602 in Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 4,427 of 5,282. Revenue changed by −55.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REALLY! AS |  Beaver |
3 MNOK | −130.3% | 25 |
| Workplacedevelopers AS (this company) | Beaver |
3 MNOK | 13.2% | 31 |
| Aproject AS |  Lion |
3 MNOK | 54.2% | 65 |
| LS Gruppen AS |  Elephant |
3 MNOK | 17.2% | 47 |
| Vassal Management AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 51.4% | 69 |
| Abis AS |  Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 24.9% | 44 |
| Dapen AS | Lion |
3 MNOK | 99.1% | 73 |
| Birdz Innovation AS | Elephant |
3 MNOK | 6.7% | 51 |
| Charge AS | Elephant |
3 MNOK | 9.2% | 58 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
2 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Nordic Psychology Services AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Nordic Psychology Services AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (1 company), Helse og omsorg (1 company) 2 of 2 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Nordic Psychology Services AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Nordic Psychology Services AS
- Workplacedevelopers AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 31 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Nordic Psychology Services AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Nordic Psychology Services AS (holds 100%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Nordic Psychology Services AS · 100.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 31 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 60 | 57 | 31 | |
| Rank | 1,940 | 2,272 | 5,565 | |
| Operating margin | 47.1% | 48.8% | 13.2% | |
| Return on assets | 64.0% | 70.7% | 15.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 20.4% | 4.6% | 19.4% | |
| Current ratio | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.24 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 14.3% | −55.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.0 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 2.8 MNOK | 3.4 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 2.8 MNOK | 3.5 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.6 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 2.2 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.5 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 4.4 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.9 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 3.5 MNOK | 4.7 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 3.5 MNOK | 4.7 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 31 October 2026, accounts id 6489069.
Further
Similar companies
- Relationsales AS index 31, rank 5,562 · compare
- DOBIS P.R. AS index 31, rank 5,563 · compare
- Topnor Regnskap AS index 31, rank 5,567 · compare
- Matrix Advokater AS index 31, rank 5,568 · compare
- Orkland Regnskap AS index 31, rank 5,569 · compare