TIGER AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
40of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 29 % of medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 26,352 of 38,671 · Handel
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 5 and solidity 68 out of 100 among medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
TIGER AS is 9 points below the median for medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 2,198 companies.
Against medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −3.5% (median 3.2%) and equity ratio 46.1% (median 32.6%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 283 MNOK | 173 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −3.5% | 3.2% |
| Profit margin | −3.7% | 3.2% |
| Return on assets | −5.4% | 11.6% |
| Equity ratio | 46.1% | 32.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 1.17 | 2.03 |
| Current ratio | 1.88 | 1.38 |
| Revenue growth | 8.7% | 6.8% |
| Revenue per employee | 4.49 MNOK | 6.45 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to medium-sized companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 40, TIGER AS does better than 29% of medium-sized companies in the same sector (2,203 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- TIGER AS
- Median: medium-sized companies in the same sector
TIGER AS has a score of 40 for 2025, rank 26,352 of 38,671 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 72 against peers, current ratio 1.88 against a median of 1.38. Solidity: percentile 68 against peers, equity ratio 46.1% against a median of 32.6%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 5 against peers, operating margin −3.5% against a median of 3.2%. Consistency: percentile 16 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −3.7% (median 3.2%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −3.5% (median 3.2%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
TIGER AS had an operating margin of −3.5% and an equity ratio of 46.1% in 2025, and ranks 26,352 of 38,671 in Handel.
No large changes in the key figures from 2024 to 2025.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 84 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 84 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −3.7% (median 3.2%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −3.5% (median 3.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2017, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2017, with a median operating margin of −65.6%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 5 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 68 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 72 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 56 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 16 | weight 15% |
Durability: 50 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is TIGER AS?
The operating margin was −3.5% in 2025, against a median of 3.2% among medium-sized companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −5.4%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is TIGER AS?
The equity ratio was 46.1% in 2025 (median 32.6%). Debt-to-equity was 1.17 (median 2.03).
What is the liquidity of TIGER AS like?
The current ratio was 1.88 in 2025 (median 1.38).
How does TIGER AS compare in Handel?
TIGER AS ranks 26,352 of 38,671 in Handel for 2025. Among companies of the same size (medium-sized companies) it ranks 1,560 of 2,203. Revenue changed by 8.7% from the year before.
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 916759541
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Handel (47.300)
- Size tier
- medium
- Employees
- 63 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 26 May 1921 105 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.50 MNOK
- Business address
- Karenslyst allé 12, 0278 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 106–282 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Marius Kristiansen
- Chair of the board
- Kristine Stranne
- Board member
- Odd Ture Wang
- Board member
- Leif Petter Tunold
- Board member
- Anne Bache Dahl
- Board member
- Stein Rømmerud
- Auditor
- ERNST & YOUNG AS
- Accountant
- NORGESGRUPPEN REGNSKAP AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 74 | 37 | 40 | |
| Rank | 4,540 | 27,160 | 26,352 | |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | −3.0% | −3.5% | |
| Return on assets | 17.1% | −5.9% | −5.4% | |
| Equity ratio | 56.8% | 48.2% | 46.1% | |
| Current ratio | 2.33 | 1.95 | 1.88 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −8.7% | 8.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 285.2 MNOK | 260.3 MNOK | 282.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 16.6 MNOK | −7.7 MNOK | −9.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 18.0 MNOK | −7.5 MNOK | −10.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 14.0 MNOK | −5.9 MNOK | −8.1 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 105.4 MNOK | 124.6 MNOK | 181.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 104.9 MNOK | 124.5 MNOK | 181.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 59.8 MNOK | 60.1 MNOK | 83.9 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 33.4 MNOK | 27.5 MNOK | 19.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 45.6 MNOK | 64.5 MNOK | 98.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 45.1 MNOK | 63.9 MNOK | 96.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 7077397.
Further
Similar companies
- JG HANSEN AS index 40, rank 26,326 · compare
- LEIRA BIL AS index 40, rank 26,337 · compare
- GRØNDAL BILBUTIKKEN AS index 40, rank 26,346 · compare
- CAMFIL NORGE AS index 40, rank 26,347 · compare
- NORSK GJENVINNING DOWNSTREAM AS index 40, rank 26,385 · compare