Kada Studio AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 23.2% Better than the industry Industry: 5.8%
- Returns · return on assets 51.7% Better than the industry Industry: 14.0%
- Solidity · equity ratio 67.1% Better than the industry Industry: 33.0%
- Liquidity · current ratio 3.04 Better than the industry Industry: 1.43
- Growth · revenue growth 52.2% Better than the industry Industry: 8.6%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
83of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 99 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 27 of 1,908 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 182 of 10,060 · Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 91 and resilience 88 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Kada Studio AS is 32 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,907 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 23.2% (median 5.8%) and equity ratio 67.1% (median 33.0%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 1,128 % from 2023 to 2025, to 10.5 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 26.4% in 2023 to 23.2% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 13.6% in 2023 to 67.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.9 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK | 10.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.1 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 924550554
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (74.130)
- Purpose
- Tilby tjenester innen interiørdesign, konseptutvikling, innredning, styling, møbel- og materialvalg, prosjektledelse samt handel med interiørrelaterte produkter og annen tilknyttet virksomhet.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 1.0 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 20 January 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Sjølyst plass 3, 0278 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Former names
- Kada Holding AS until 2023
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Kada Studio AS has a score of 83 for 2025, rank 182 of 10,060 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 91 against peers, operating margin 23.2% against a median of 5.8%. Liquidity: percentile 89 against peers, current ratio 3.04 against a median of 1.43.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 1.4 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company −0.8, the industry −2.1 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- positive
Upper quartile on profitability, solidity and liquidity. What sets this company apart from the rest of the sector?
Based on: Operating margin 23.2% (median 5.8%); Equity ratio 67.1% (median 33.0%); Current ratio 3.04 (median 1.43).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 91 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 88 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 89 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 64 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 88 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 79 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 5.8% |
| Profit margin | 23.4% | 5.9% |
| Return on assets | 51.7% | 14.0% |
| Equity ratio | 67.1% | 33.0% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.49 | 1.77 |
| Current ratio | 3.04 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | 52.2% | 8.6% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 83, Kada Studio AS does better than 99% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,908 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Kada Studio AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
60 days | 65 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
14 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
5.1% | −5.0% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
55.9% | 41.9% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
64.4 | 15.3 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
2.4% | 0.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 12.6% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.5 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell by 0.8 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 2.1 points. So the company did 1.4 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Kada Studio AS moved the same way as comparable companies 2 times. About 44% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23.9% | 8.0% | −2.5 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points | −2.0 percentage points |
| 2025 | 23.2% | 5.8% | −0.8 percentage points | −2.1 percentage points | +1.4 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Kada Studio AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities rose 8.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: architectural and engineering activities, annual average | 99.0 | 108.8 | 127.9 | 146.4 | 158.3 | 155.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +9.8% | +9.9% | +17.5% | +14.5% | +8.1% | −1.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: advertising and market research (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: advertising and market research rose 3.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: advertising and market research, annual average | 99.4 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 106.9 | 110.7 | 126.1 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +35.1% | +14.2% | −4.6% | −1.3% | +3.6% | +13.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: other professional and technical activities rose 6.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: other professional and technical activities, annual average | 98.3 | 121.6 | 139.4 | 131.0 | 139.1 | 158.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +29.9% | +23.7% | +14.6% | −6.0% | +6.2% | +13.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Service prices: architects and engineering (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: architects and engineering rose 3.2% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: architects and engineering, annual average | 100.0 | 103.6 | 107.5 | 111.2 | 114.7 | 119.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.2% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
Oil price (export price of crude oil) fell 17.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: architects and engineering (indeks)
Wage index: architects and engineering rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Kada Studio AS fell 0.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: architects and engineering, annual average | 90.5 | 90.9 | 96.0 | 100.9 | 105.6 | 109.2 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +7.4% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Kada Studio AS had an operating margin of 23.2% and an equity ratio of 67.1% in 2025, and ranks 182 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 52% and the equity ratio rose from 58.7% to 67.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 13 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation.
That is about 13,000 NOK per share, on 1,000 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 8 MNOK and 18 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.4 | 14 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 17.4 | 18 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.1 | 8 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 25 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 15 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −3 MNOK |
| Equity value | 18 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (74): Business & Consumer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Equity paid out or paid in
- Equity moved as the result implied in 2025.
Over 2 years it equals 0% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
- The chair is under 60.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 0 of 2 on the board are 60 or older.
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Kada Studio AS?
The operating margin was 23.2% in 2025, against a median of 5.8% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 51.7%.
How solid is Kada Studio AS?
The equity ratio was 67.1% in 2025 (median 33.0%). Debt-to-equity was 0.49 (median 1.77).
What is the liquidity of Kada Studio AS like?
The current ratio was 3.04 in 2025 (median 1.43).
How does Kada Studio AS compare in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning?
Kada Studio AS ranks 182 of 10,060 in Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 27 of 1,908. Revenue changed by 52.2% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boligstylisten AS |  Cheetah |
13 MNOK | 5.7% | 48 |
| Din Boligstylist AS | Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 22.4% | 60 |
| CHRISTIANS & Hennie AS · same municipality | Cheetah |
12 MNOK | 9.9% | 41 |
| CS Interior Design AS · same municipality |  Lion |
11 MNOK | 13.0% | 78 |
| Kada Studio AS (this company) | Lion |
10 MNOK | 23.2% | 83 |
| SJ Design AS · same municipality |  Beaver |
10 MNOK | −12.5% | 23 |
| HUS & Hjem Styling AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 14.0% | 64 |
| Boligkonsulentene AS | Cheetah |
9 MNOK | 16.6% | 43 |
| KASPARA BOLIGSTYLING & Interiør AS | Beaver |
8 MNOK | −0.3% | 33 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 76 | 83 | |
| Rank | – | 662 | 182 | |
| Operating margin | 26.4% | 23.9% | 23.2% | |
| Return on assets | 10.8% | 73.2% | 51.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 13.6% | 58.7% | 67.1% | |
| Current ratio | 1.47 | 3.84 | 3.04 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 706.7% | 52.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 0.9 MNOK | 6.9 MNOK | 10.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.1 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 1.9 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK | 4.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.3 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.8 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.3 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6457241.
Further
Similar companies
- Spider Solutions AS index 83, rank 171 · compare
- Total Ndt AS index 83, rank 172 · compare
- Von Der Lippe Interiør AS index 83, rank 178 · compare
- Avalon Norway AS index 83, rank 191 · compare
- Mirmorax AS index 83, rank 195 · compare
News and announcements
- 12 August 2026 Ny forretningsadresse (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene
From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link