Ambla AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 12.0% Better than the industry Industry: 4.0%
- Returns · return on assets 35.2% Better than the industry Industry: 9.6%
- Solidity · equity ratio 74.1% Better than the industry Industry: 31.4%
- Liquidity · current ratio 3.92 Better than the industry Industry: 1.37
- Growth · revenue growth −28.5% Weaker than the industry Industry: 5.5%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
69of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 85 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 325 of 2,104 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 498 of 3,245 · Undervisning
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 79 and resilience 80 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Ambla AS is 19 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 2,102 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 12.0% (median 4.0%) and equity ratio 74.1% (median 31.4%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 24 % from 2023 to 2025, to 1.7 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −0.9% in 2023 to 12.0% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 62.9% in 2023 to 74.1% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.2 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 925767530
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Undervisning (85.597)
- Purpose
- Undervisning, kursvirksomhet, helsehjelp ved kriser og annen tilsvarende virksomhet samt det som naturlig står i forbindelse med dette.
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 1 July 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o Håvard Sørmoen, Amundrødbakken 8B, 3295 HELGEROA (LARVIK)
- Municipality
- Larvik rank 4 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- No
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ambla AS has a score of 69 for 2025, rank 498 of 3,245 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 88 against peers, current ratio 3.92 against a median of 1.37. Solidity: percentile 85 against peers, equity ratio 74.1% against a median of 31.4%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 39 against peers, revenue growth −28.5% against a median of 5.5%.
Worth a closer look
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 6.2 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +7.1, the industry +0.9 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- positive
Upper quartile on profitability, solidity and liquidity. What sets this company apart from the rest of the sector?
Based on: Operating margin 12.0% (median 4.0%); Equity ratio 74.1% (median 31.4%); Current ratio 3.92 (median 1.37).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 4.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −5.7%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 79 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 85 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 88 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 39 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 64 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 62 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | 4.0% |
| Profit margin | 11.6% | 3.7% |
| Return on assets | 35.2% | 9.6% |
| Equity ratio | 74.1% | 31.4% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.35 | 1.45 |
| Current ratio | 3.92 | 1.37 |
| Revenue growth | −28.5% | 5.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 69, Ambla AS does better than 85% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (2,104 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Ambla AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
30 days | 20 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−0.6% | −10.5% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
76.2% | 73.8% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
30.8 | 4.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
4.4% | 0.8% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
1.7% | 22.4% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.0 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Ambla AS rose by 7.1 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.9 points. So the company did 6.2 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Ambla AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 11% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.9% | 3.1% | +5.8 percentage points | −0.6 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points |
| 2025 | 12.0% | 4.0% | +7.1 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Ambla AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Ambla AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.9% | 4.9% | 12.0% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Ambla AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.9% | 4.9% | 12.0% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: education (indeks)
Wage index: education rose 4.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Ambla AS rose 7.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: education, annual average | 88.6 | 91.8 | 96.8 | 101.8 | 106.7 | 110.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +1.9% | +3.6% | +5.5% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −0.9% | 4.9% | 12.0% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Ambla AS had an operating margin of 12.0% and an equity ratio of 74.1% in 2025, and ranks 498 of 3,245 in Undervisning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from 4.9% to 12.0% and the equity ratio rose from 59.1% to 74.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.8 | 1 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 12.2 | 1 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.8 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 1 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 1 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 1 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −58% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Education.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Ambla AS?
The operating margin was 12.0% in 2025, against a median of 4.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 35.2%.
How solid is Ambla AS?
The equity ratio was 74.1% in 2025 (median 31.4%). Debt-to-equity was 0.35 (median 1.45).
What is the liquidity of Ambla AS like?
The current ratio was 3.92 in 2025 (median 1.37).
How does Ambla AS compare in Undervisning?
Ambla AS ranks 498 of 3,245 in Undervisning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 325 of 2,104. Revenue changed by −28.5% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyrebar Omsorg AS |  Beaver |
2 MNOK | −13.1% | 5 |
| Steffisteaching AS |  Lion |
2 MNOK | 50.3% | 82 |
| Livea AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −4.5% | 21 |
| BB Gym Bodø AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −5.0% | 13 |
| NY Kurs AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 23.9% | 78 |
| Ambla AS (this company) | Lion |
2 MNOK | 12.0% | 69 |
| AM Elektrokompetanse AS | Lion |
2 MNOK | 58.1% | 65 |
| Techtorget AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −2.0% | 37 |
| Power Tools Norge AS | Beaver |
2 MNOK | −36.4% | 15 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 4 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 3
- Largest owner
- 33.3%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 33%
- Owners over 60
- 67% of the shares held by persons (median age 63)
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 52 | 66 | 69 | |
| Rank | 1,581 | 735 | 498 | |
| Operating margin | −0.9% | 4.9% | 12.0% | |
| Return on assets | 0.5% | 25.6% | 35.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 62.9% | 59.1% | 74.1% | |
| Current ratio | 2.69 | 2.46 | 3.92 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 6.8% | −28.5% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.2 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.3 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6955788.
Further
Similar companies
- Nøtteliten Blommenholmveien AS index 69, rank 493 · compare
- Berg Familiebarnehage AS index 69, rank 494 · compare
- Oliana AS index 69, rank 495 · compare
- Nøtteliten Tveterlia AS index 69, rank 496 · compare
- Undervisningshuset AS index 69, rank 497 · compare