Elementia AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
1of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 0 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,345 of 3,345 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 7,072 of 7,073 · Industri
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 1 and resilience 2 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Elementia AS is 50 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 3,345 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −142.7% (median 4.0%) and equity ratio −477.4% (median 39.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 9 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −142.7% | 4.0% |
| Profit margin | −153.8% | 3.5% |
| Return on assets | −250.5% | 7.3% |
| Equity ratio | −477.4% | 39.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 1.69 |
| Revenue growth | −85.7% | 5.0% |
| Revenue per employee | 0.81 MNOK | 0.79 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 1, Elementia AS does better than 0% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (3,345 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Elementia AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
86 days | 35 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
80 days | 16 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−52.2% | −3.2% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
6.2% | 42.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−12.3 | 3.4 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
3.5% | 1.5% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 28.3% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −4.6 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 1.0 MNOK, 0.9 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Elementia AS has a score of 1 for 2025, rank 7,072 of 7,073 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 9 against peers, current ratio 0.50 against a median of 1.69.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −477.4% against a median of 39.9%. Growth: percentile 1 against peers, revenue growth −85.7% against a median of 5.0%.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −477.4% (median 39.9%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.50 (median 1.69).
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −12.3 (median 3.4); financial costs as a share of debt 3.5% (median 1.5%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Elementia AS fell by 134.0 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 1.3 points. So the company did 132.7 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Elementia AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 2% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −8.6% | 5.4% | +0.1 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points | −0.7 percentage points |
| 2025 | −142.7% | 4.0% | −134.0 percentage points | −1.3 percentage points | −132.7 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Elementia AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Producer prices in manufacturing (indeks (2021 = 100))
Producer prices in manufacturing rose 2.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Elementia AS fell 134.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer prices in manufacturing, annual average | 100.0 | 124.7 | 129.5 | 134.4 | 138.3 | 146.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.7% | +24.7% | +3.9% | +3.7% | +2.9% | +6.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | – |
Source: SSB (12462, CC BY 4.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Elementia AS fell 134.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wholesale power price (øre per kWh)
Wholesale power price rose 9.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Elementia AS fell 134.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale power price, annual average | 64.2 | 141.7 | 72.0 | 49.4 | 54.0 | 96.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +466.7% | +120.8% | −49.2% | −31.4% | +9.4% | +78.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | – |
Source: SSB (09363, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Elementia AS fell 134.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: fabricated metal products (indeks)
Wage index: fabricated metal products rose 5.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Elementia AS fell 134.0 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: fabricated metal products, annual average | 88.0 | 91.5 | 96.9 | 102.1 | 108.0 | 112.8 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.1% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +5.4% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Elementia AS had an operating margin of −142.7% and an equity ratio of −477.4% in 2025, and ranks 7,072 of 7,073 in Industri.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from −8.6% to −142.7% and the equity ratio fell from −175.8% to −477.4%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.2 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 18.6 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.0 | not meaningful |
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Machinery, Food Processing, Chemical (Specialty), Building Materials, Packaging & Container.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −477.4% (median 39.9%).
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.50 (median 1.69).
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −12.3 (median 3.4); Financial costs as a share of debt 3.5% (median 1.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −153.8% (median 3.5%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −142.7% (median 4.0%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 86 days (median 35 days).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −52.2% (median −3.2%); Current ratio 0.50 (median 1.69).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 1 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 9 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 1 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 3 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 8 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Elementia AS?
The operating margin was −142.7% in 2025, against a median of 4.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −250.5%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Elementia AS?
The equity ratio was −477.4% in 2025 (median 39.9%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Elementia AS like?
The current ratio was 0.50 in 2025 (median 1.69). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Elementia AS compare in Industri?
Elementia AS ranks 7,072 of 7,073 in Industri for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,345 of 3,345. Revenue changed by −85.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Takstoler AS |  Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 5.4% | 54 |
| Beverlo AS |  Lion |
10 MNOK | 87.9% | 77 |
| Suldalstrappa AS |  Beaver |
9 MNOK | −18.3% | 18 |
| Næstby Fabrikk AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | −1.6% | 30 |
| Ølen Trevare AS | Lion |
9 MNOK | 20.5% | 75 |
| Elementia AS (this company) | Beaver |
9 MNOK | −142.7% | 1 |
| Risør Trapp AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | 2.5% | 48 |
| Fortuna Trevarefabrikk AS |  Elephant |
9 MNOK | −0.6% | 50 |
| Espa Snekkerverksted AS | Beaver |
9 MNOK | 2.3% | 46 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
86 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
No owner holds more than half of the shares in Skips AS Tudor.
Skips AS Tudor has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Eiendom (82 companies), Industri (1 company), Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company), Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (1 company), Sjøfart (1 company) 86 of 86 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 18 in all. Oslo 11, Bergen 7 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 63 companies: Bomer Nannestad 4 AS, Arnebråtveien 137 AS, Elementia AS, Hilleren Næring 2 AS, Bomer Eikelyhagen AS, Obg 10 AS …
- Loss
- 79 companies: Bovieran Falkum AS, Arnebråtveien 137 AS, Elementia AS, Hilleren Næring 2 AS, Bomer Eikelyhagen AS, Obg 10 AS …
- Changed 2024–2025
- 8 companies joined the group, among them: Bomer 61 AS, Industriveien 38-48 Holding AS, Industriveien 46-48 AS, Torgkvartalet Hof AS, Hilleren Næring 4 AS, Bomer 60 AS. 4 companies left, among them: Tjora Eiendom AS, Bomer 37 AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Skips AS Tudor
-
Bomer AS
- Elementia AS you are here
- Bomer Nannestad 4 AS
- Arnebråtveien 137 AS
- Hilleren Prosjektering AS
- Bomer Eikelyhagen AS
- Obg 10 AS
- Skådalsveien 23 AS
- Bomer Bygård AS
- Bomer Utleie 5 AS
- Bomer Bolig AS
- Munkengveien 4 B AS
- Alpinveien Bolig AS
- Bomer 34 AS
- Bomer 36 AS
- Bomer 38 AS
- and 34 more companies
- Sjølyst Omsorg AS
- Bankerød Boliger AS
- E2 Utvikling AS
- Jardinan AS
- Korsegården Utvikling AS
- Parbulk II AS
- Strandveien 20 Invest AS
- Strømsdalen Boligutvikling AS
-
The tree shows up to 4 levels below the top. Large groups have more companies than shown.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 928955397
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Industri (16.230)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 11 registered 10 July 2026
- Founded
- 16 February 2022 4 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o BoMer as, Observatoriegata 10, 0254 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 3 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 60.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 60%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Bomer AS (60%)
Ultimate owner: Skips AS TUDOR
The owner: the majority owner Bomer AS (holds 60%) made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 5 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 5 | 19 | 1 | |
| Rank | 6,454 | 6,355 | 7,072 | |
| Operating margin | −8.7% | −8.6% | −142.7% | |
| Return on assets | −25.5% | −108.5% | −250.5% | |
| Equity ratio | −21.4% | −175.8% | −477.4% | |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 0.08 | 0.50 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 53.3% | −85.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 40.6 MNOK | 62.3 MNOK | 8.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −3.5 MNOK | −5.4 MNOK | −12.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | −3.7 MNOK | −6.6 MNOK | −13.7 MNOK |
| Tax expense | −0.8 MNOK | −1.5 MNOK | 2.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | −2.9 MNOK | −5.2 MNOK | −16.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.2 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 13.8 MNOK | 4.6 MNOK | 5.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 11.7 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 4.3 MNOK |
| Equity | −3.0 MNOK | −8.1 MNOK | −24.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −3.0 MNOK | −8.1 MNOK | −24.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 16.8 MNOK | 12.8 MNOK | 29.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 16.4 MNOK | 12.4 MNOK | 8.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 5 November 2026, accounts id 7212270.
Further
Similar companies
- Samisk Tekstil AS index 2, rank 7,066 · compare
- Bakst AS index 2, rank 7,067 · compare
- Bryte AS index 2, rank 7,068 · compare
- Daglig Deig AS index 2, rank 7,070 · compare
- Valunor AS index 1, rank 7,071 · compare