Modish AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 9.2% Better than the industry Industry: 5.3%
- Returns · return on assets 23.2% Better than the industry Industry: 9.9%
- Solidity · equity ratio 20.2% Weaker than the industry Industry: 34.6%
- Liquidity · current ratio 0.69 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.34
- Growth · revenue growth 88.7% Better than the industry Industry: 7.7%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
62of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 74 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 396 of 1,531 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,934 of 7,317 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 69 and resilience 38 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Modish AS is 11 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,530 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 9.2% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio 20.2% (median 34.6%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 523 % from 2023 to 2025, to 10.2 MNOK. The operating margin rose from 1.7% in 2023 to 9.2% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 2.5% in 2023 to 20.2% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.6 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK | 10.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 930380008
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Purpose
- Utvikling og salg av programvare for digital annonsering og kommunikasjon.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 10 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 17 October 2022 4 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Edvard Storms gate 2, 0166 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Modish AS has a score of 62 for 2025, rank 1,934 of 7,317 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 84 against peers, revenue growth 88.7% against a median of 7.7%. Profitability: percentile 69 against peers, operating margin 9.2% against a median of 5.3%.
Weakest: Liquidity: percentile 13 against peers, current ratio 0.69 against a median of 1.34. Solidity: percentile 29 against peers, equity ratio 20.2% against a median of 34.6%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.5 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
- Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have? Based on: revenue growth 88.7% (median 7.7%); current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
- Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed? Based on: net working capital to revenue −14.2% (median −7.8%); current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.5 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
- watch
Strong growth with weak liquidity. Is the growth financed, or does it tie up capital the company does not have?
Based on: Revenue growth 88.7% (median 7.7%); Current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −14.2% (median −7.8%); Current ratio 0.69 (median 1.34).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 69 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 29 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 13 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 84 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 68 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 43 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 20 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 9.2% | 5.3% |
| Profit margin | 8.8% | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 23.2% | 9.9% |
| Equity ratio | 20.2% | 34.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 3.95 | 1.61 |
| Current ratio | 0.69 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | 88.7% | 7.7% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.02 MNOK | 1.93 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 62, Modish AS does better than 74% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,531 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Modish AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
65 days | 73 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−14.2% | −7.8% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
18.9% | 43.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
17.5 | 8.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.7% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 13.9% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −1.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.1 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Modish AS rose by 6.7 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 1.2 points. So the company did 7.9 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Modish AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 16% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.5% | 6.5% | +0.8 percentage points | +0.4 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points |
| 2025 | 9.2% | 5.3% | +6.7 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Modish AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Modish AS rose 6.7 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Modish AS had an operating margin of 9.2% and an equity ratio of 20.2% in 2025, and ranks 1,934 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 89% and the equity ratio rose from 1.6% to 20.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 2 MNOK and 4 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 3 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | 4 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.6 | 2 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 5 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 3 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 4 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Modish AS?
The operating margin was 9.2% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 23.2%.
How solid is Modish AS?
The equity ratio was 20.2% in 2025 (median 34.6%). Debt-to-equity was 3.95 (median 1.61).
What is the liquidity of Modish AS like?
The current ratio was 0.69 in 2025 (median 1.34). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Modish AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Modish AS ranks 1,934 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 396 of 1,531. Revenue changed by 88.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Registration System AS |  Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 15.4% | 48 |
| Joy Zone AS · same municipality |  Lion |
10 MNOK | 61.5% | 83 |
| Storevik IT AS |  Beaver |
10 MNOK | −3.9% | 29 |
| Fyr Consulting AS · same municipality | Lion |
10 MNOK | 15.5% | 68 |
| Vision Technology Grid AS | Lion |
10 MNOK | −0.3% | 67 |
| Kundelab AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 16.6% | 64 |
| Modish AS (this company) | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 9.2% | 62 |
| Fonn AS | Beaver |
10 MNOK | −195.7% | 15 |
| Yeti Move AS |  Elephant |
10 MNOK | −55.6% | 29 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 3
- Largest owner
- 45.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 90%
- Owners over 60
- 0% of the shares held by persons (median age 43)
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 5 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 26 | 41 | 62 | |
| Rank | 5,432 | 4,776 | 1,934 | |
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 2.5% | 9.2% | |
| Return on assets | 2.2% | 4.6% | 23.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 2.5% | 1.6% | 20.2% | |
| Current ratio | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.69 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 230.0% | 88.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.6 MNOK | 5.4 MNOK | 10.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 1.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 4.1 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.4 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 3.0 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 5 November 2026, accounts id 6526623.
Further
Similar companies
- Eiendomsmalen AS index 62, rank 1,930 · compare
- Film in Norway AS index 62, rank 1,935 · compare
- Emisoft AS index 62, rank 1,938 · compare
- Impact Nordic Norway AS index 62, rank 1,946 · compare
- Laft Software AS index 62, rank 1,947 · compare