Vision Technology Grid AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin −0.3% Weaker than the industry Industry: 5.3%
- Returns · return on assets 22.7% Better than the industry Industry: 9.9%
- Solidity · equity ratio 68.3% Better than the industry Industry: 34.6%
- Liquidity · current ratio 1.53 About like the industry Industry: 1.34
- Growth · revenue growth 36.7% Better than the industry Industry: 7.7%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
67of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 84 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 244 of 1,531 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,267 of 7,317 · Informasjon og kommunikasjon
Profile
Lion · Leader
High profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 50 and resilience 73 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Vision Technology Grid AS is 16 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,530 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −0.3% (median 5.3%) and equity ratio 68.3% (median 34.6%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 52 % from 2023 to 2025, to 10.2 MNOK. The operating margin rose from −11.7% in 2023 to −0.3% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 77.2% in 2023 to 68.3% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.7 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK | 10.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.8 MNOK | −1.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.9 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.5 MNOK | 13.4 MNOK | 13.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 8.1 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.4 MNOK | 5.6 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 985567336
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Informasjon og kommunikasjon (62.100)
- Purpose
- Drive utvikling og produksjon av software, kjøp, salg og agenturvirksomhet vedrørende elektroniske produkter samt annen virksomhet som naturlig hører til, herunder deltakelse i andre selskaper.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered) Payroll costs in the accounts: 3.9 MNOK (2025).
- Founded
- 3 February 2003 23 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.12 MNOK
- Business address
- Nesvegen 55, 2080 EIDSVOLL
- Municipality
- Eidsvoll rank 12–26 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Former names
- Video Technology Group AS until 2012
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Vision Technology Grid AS has a score of 67 for 2025, rank 1,267 of 7,317 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 85 against peers, revenue growth 36.7% against a median of 7.7%. Solidity: percentile 84 against peers, equity ratio 68.3% against a median of 34.6%.
No area is clearly below its peers.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −0.3 (median 8.0); financial costs as a share of debt 2.2% (median 1.2%).
- Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group? Based on: receivable days 167 days (median 73 days).
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 17.0 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +15.8, the industry −1.2 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −0.3 (median 8.0); Financial costs as a share of debt 2.2% (median 1.2%).
- watch
Receivables equal far more days of revenue than at comparable companies. Do customers pay late, or are these loans to companies in the same group?
Based on: Receivable days 167 days (median 73 days).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 4.1%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 50 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 84 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 59 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 85 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 57 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 56 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 20 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −0.3% | 5.3% |
| Profit margin | 28.5% | 5.5% |
| Return on assets | 22.7% | 9.9% |
| Equity ratio | 68.3% | 34.6% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.46 | 1.61 |
| Current ratio | 1.53 | 1.34 |
| Revenue growth | 36.7% | 7.7% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 67, Vision Technology Grid AS does better than 84% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,531 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Vision Technology Grid AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
167 days | 73 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
52 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
18.8% | −7.8% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
4.9% | 43.2% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−0.3 | 8.0 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
2.2% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 13.9% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 1.9 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.1 MNOK, 0.1 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose by 15.8 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 1.2 points. So the company did 17.0 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Vision Technology Grid AS moved the same way as comparable companies 0 times. About 7% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | −16.1% | 6.5% | −4.4 percentage points | +0.4 percentage points | −4.8 percentage points |
| 2025 | −0.3% | 5.3% | +15.8 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points | +17.0 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: information and communication rose 4.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: information and communication, annual average | 100.0 | 103.3 | 108.7 | 112.2 | 116.7 | 120.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +3.2% | +5.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: information and communication (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: information and communication rose 4.6% in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: information and communication, annual average | 99.6 | 111.4 | 126.4 | 128.3 | 134.2 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +14.7% | +11.8% | +13.5% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Wage index: IT services (indeks)
Wage index: IT services rose 4.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Vision Technology Grid AS rose 15.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: IT services, annual average | 84.9 | 87.8 | 92.3 | 97.3 | 101.5 | 105.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Vision Technology Grid AS had an operating margin of −0.3% and an equity ratio of 68.3% in 2025, and ranks 1,267 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −16.1% to −0.3% and revenue grew by 37%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 20 MNOK and 20 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.0 | 20 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.9 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 3.6 | 20 MNOK |
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (62): Computer Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Vision Technology Grid AS?
The operating margin was −0.3% in 2025, against a median of 5.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 22.7%.
How solid is Vision Technology Grid AS?
The equity ratio was 68.3% in 2025 (median 34.6%). Debt-to-equity was 0.46 (median 1.61).
What is the liquidity of Vision Technology Grid AS like?
The current ratio was 1.53 in 2025 (median 1.34).
How does Vision Technology Grid AS compare in Informasjon og kommunikasjon?
Vision Technology Grid AS ranks 1,267 of 7,317 in Informasjon og kommunikasjon for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 244 of 1,531. Revenue changed by 36.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Registration System AS |  Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 15.4% | 48 |
| Joy Zone AS |  Lion |
10 MNOK | 61.5% | 83 |
| Storevik IT AS |  Beaver |
10 MNOK | −3.9% | 29 |
| Fyr Consulting AS | Lion |
10 MNOK | 15.5% | 68 |
| Vision Technology Grid AS (this company) | Lion |
10 MNOK | −0.3% | 67 |
| Kundelab AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 16.6% | 64 |
| Modish AS | Cheetah |
10 MNOK | 9.2% | 62 |
| Fonn AS | Beaver |
10 MNOK | −195.7% | 15 |
| Yeti Move AS |  Elephant |
10 MNOK | −55.6% | 29 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 50% of the shares in Vision Technology Grid AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Vision Technology Grid AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Handel (2 companies), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Loss
- 1 company: Orlaco Norge AS
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Vision Technology Grid AS you are here
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Public contracts
- Contracts awarded since 2024
- 0
- Total awarded value since 2024
- value not stated
| Date | Buyer | Notice | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 May 2019 | Romerike Avfallsforedling IKS (ROAF) | Flåtestyring (1) | 1.7 MNOK |
Based on notices in Doffin. Does not show call-offs under framework agreements or purchases below the publication threshold. Values are as stated by the buyer.
Dependence on public contracts
Awarded value in the year seen against revenue the same year. This is not a share of revenue: the value is the whole contract, often for several years, and it does not necessarily become revenue that year.
Key contracts
The largest contracts by awarded value, framework agreements excluded.
| Date | Buyer | Contract | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 May 2019 | Romerike Avfallsforedling IKS (ROAF) | Flåtestyring (1) | 1.7 MNOK |
- The value is the whole contract as stated by the buyer, often for several years.
- Framework agreements are left out of the sums, since the value is a ceiling. Many frameworks are not marked in Doffin and may still be included.
- Only awards where Doffin gives the company's organisation number.
- Contracts without a stated value are counted but not summed.
- An indication of dependence, not an accounting figure. End dates are rarely in the Doffin data.
Source: Doffin (DFØ), fetched 28 October 2026. Winners are matched on organisation number.
Contains data under the Norwegian licence for public data (NLOD 2.0) made available by Doffin/the Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management (DFØ). NLOD 2.0
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 50.4%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 50%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
Change 2007–2025: no material change in the owners.
Majority owner of: Instek AS (100%), Orlaco Norge AS (100%)
Holds shares in: Orlaco Norge AS (100%), Instek AS (100%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 55 | 45 | 67 | |
| Rank | 2,747 | 4,307 | 1,267 | |
| Operating margin | −11.7% | −16.1% | −0.3% | |
| Return on assets | 9.3% | 12.3% | 22.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 77.2% | 58.6% | 68.3% | |
| Current ratio | 2.20 | 1.35 | 1.53 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 11.4% | 36.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 6.7 MNOK | 7.5 MNOK | 10.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −0.8 MNOK | −1.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.9 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.9 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.5 MNOK | 13.4 MNOK | 13.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 3.8 MNOK | 6.6 MNOK | 6.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 8.1 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 7.9 MNOK | 7.6 MNOK | 8.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 2.4 MNOK | 5.6 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.7 MNOK | 4.9 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 6935210.
Further
Similar companies
- Remote Production AS index 67, rank 1,251 · compare
- Skynova AS index 67, rank 1,252 · compare
- Infosoft AS index 67, rank 1,254 · compare
- Kronstadposten AS index 67, rank 1,259 · compare
- Solver Norway AS index 67, rank 1,273 · compare