Digloo AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
11of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 3 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,246 of 3,345 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,895 of 7,073 · Industri
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 4 and resilience 27 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Digloo AS is 40 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 3,345 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −350.6% (median 4.0%) and equity ratio 27.5% (median 39.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 3 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −350.6% | 4.0% |
| Profit margin | −358.6% | 3.5% |
| Return on assets | −32.2% | 7.3% |
| Equity ratio | 27.5% | 39.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 2.63 | 1.09 |
| Current ratio | 0.37 | 1.69 |
| Revenue growth | −88.7% | 5.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 11, Digloo AS does better than 3% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (3,345 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Digloo AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
−183 days | 35 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
1,192 days | 16 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−509.7% | −3.2% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
4.6% | 42.7% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−39.2 | 3.4 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
1.1% | 1.5% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 28.3% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −14.7 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.3 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Digloo AS has a score of 11 for 2025, rank 6,895 of 7,073 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 33 against peers, equity ratio 27.5% against a median of 39.9%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 0 against peers, revenue growth −88.7% against a median of 5.0%. Profitability: percentile 4 against peers, operating margin −350.6% against a median of 4.0%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.7 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.37 (median 1.69).
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −39.2 (median 3.4); financial costs as a share of debt 1.1% (median 1.5%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −358.6% (median 3.5%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Digloo AS fell by 377.1 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.6 points. So the company did 376.5 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Digloo AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 0% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26.5% | 4.6% | −10.0 percentage points | 0.0 percentage points | −10.0 percentage points |
| 2025 | −350.6% | 4.0% | −377.1 percentage points | −0.6 percentage points | −376.5 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Digloo AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Producer prices in manufacturing (indeks (2021 = 100))
Producer prices in manufacturing rose 2.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Digloo AS fell 377.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer prices in manufacturing, annual average | 100.0 | 124.7 | 129.5 | 134.4 | 138.3 | 146.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.7% | +24.7% | +3.9% | +3.7% | +2.9% | +6.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | – |
Source: SSB (12462, CC BY 4.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Digloo AS fell 377.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wholesale power price (øre per kWh)
Wholesale power price rose 9.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Digloo AS fell 377.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale power price, annual average | 64.2 | 141.7 | 72.0 | 49.4 | 54.0 | 96.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +466.7% | +120.8% | −49.2% | −31.4% | +9.4% | +78.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | – |
Source: SSB (09363, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Digloo AS fell 377.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: fabricated metal products (indeks)
Wage index: fabricated metal products rose 5.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Digloo AS fell 377.1 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: fabricated metal products, annual average | 88.0 | 91.5 | 96.9 | 102.1 | 108.0 | 112.8 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.1% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +5.4% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Digloo AS had an operating margin of −350.6% and an equity ratio of 27.5% in 2025, and ranks 6,895 of 7,073 in Industri.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 26.5% to −350.6% and the equity ratio fell from 81.2% to 27.5%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 16 MNOK and 33 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 22.2 | 21 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 18.6 | 33 MNOK |
| P/B | 3.0 | 16 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 53 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 33 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | 0 MNOK |
| Equity value | 33 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Machinery, Food Processing, Chemical (Specialty), Building Materials, Packaging & Container.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.7 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.37 (median 1.69).
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −39.2 (median 3.4); Financial costs as a share of debt 1.1% (median 1.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −358.6% (median 3.5%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −350.6% (median 4.0%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −509.7% (median −3.2%); Current ratio 0.37 (median 1.69).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.1% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 4 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 33 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 6 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 0 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 25 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 58 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Digloo AS?
The operating margin was −350.6% in 2025, against a median of 4.0% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −32.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Digloo AS?
The equity ratio was 27.5% in 2025 (median 39.9%). Debt-to-equity was 2.63 (median 1.09).
What is the liquidity of Digloo AS like?
The current ratio was 0.37 in 2025 (median 1.69). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Digloo AS compare in Industri?
Digloo AS ranks 6,895 of 7,073 in Industri for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,246 of 3,345. Revenue changed by −88.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laserhuset AS |  Elephant |
3 MNOK | 0.8% | 46 |
| Askepott Interiør AS |  Beaver |
3 MNOK | −2.7% | 37 |
| Seilservice AS |  Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 5.7% | 53 |
| Euryca AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | −19.8% | 7 |
| Digloo AS (this company) | Beaver |
3 MNOK | −350.6% | 11 |
| Jutul AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | −10.6% | 24 |
| Seeker AS | Beaver |
3 MNOK | −19.6% | 11 |
| Flowtek AS | Cheetah |
3 MNOK | 6.4% | 51 |
| Rent-Gruppen AS | Elephant |
3 MNOK | 0.2% | 50 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
6 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Rever AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Rever AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Industri (3 companies), Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning (3 companies) 6 of 6 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 6 in all. Oslo 6 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 2 companies: Circmet AS, Rever Ventures AS
- Loss
- 4 companies: Digloo AS, Circmet AS, Rever Ventures AS, Rever Holding AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 3 companies joined the group: Circmet AS, Rever Ventures AS, Digloo AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Rever AS
-
Rever Ventures AS
- Digloo AS you are here
- Circmet AS
- Rever Holding AS
- Rever Investments AS
-
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 931412140
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Industri (32.990)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 15 March 2023 3 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.01 MNOK
- Business address
- Nedre Vollgate 1, 0158 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 5 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 9 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 63.0% · top three 82.9%
- Split
- companies 81% · private persons 19% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 89%
- Owners over 60
- 0% of the shares held by persons (median age 56)
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Rever Ventures AS (63%)
Ultimate owner: private person
The owner: the majority owner Rever Ventures AS (holds 63%) had negative equity in 2025. made a loss in 2025. A weak parent can affect the subsidiary through group contributions, loans and guarantees. It is an indication to watch, not an assessment of the company.
- Rever Ventures AS · 63.0%
- Brelin AS · 10.0%
- Lano Holding AS · 7.0%
- Byeron Invest AS · 1.0%
- Aleva AS · 0.0%
- 4 private persons · 19.0%
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 92 | 72 | 11 | |
| Rank | 57 | 792 | 6,895 | |
| Operating margin | 36.5% | 26.5% | −350.6% | |
| Return on assets | 72.8% | 36.8% | −32.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 70.6% | 81.2% | 27.5% | |
| Current ratio | 3.40 | 4.38 | 0.37 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −21.9% | −88.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 32.6 MNOK | 25.5 MNOK | 2.9 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 11.9 MNOK | 6.7 MNOK | −10.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 11.1 MNOK | 7.9 MNOK | −10.4 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 2.4 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 8.8 MNOK | 6.2 MNOK | −10.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.0 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 16.7 MNOK | 22.2 MNOK | 31.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 16.7 MNOK | 18.2 MNOK | 8.4 MNOK |
| Equity | 11.8 MNOK | 18.0 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 8.8 MNOK | 15.0 MNOK | 4.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.9 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK | 22.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 4.9 MNOK | 4.2 MNOK | 22.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 7125527.
Further
Similar companies
- Evi Ski AS index 11, rank 6,892 · compare
- Printbox AS index 11, rank 6,894 · compare
- Algæ AS index 11, rank 6,897 · compare
- Expressdekor AS index 11, rank 6,898 · compare
- Dahlmans Mekaniske AS index 11, rank 6,899 · compare