Intercel Logistics AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
8of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 1 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 1,377 of 1,392 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 4,921 of 4,996 · Transport og lagring
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 13 and resilience 2 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Intercel Logistics AS is 44 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 52 among 1,392 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −2.3% (median 4.3%) and equity ratio −21.5% (median 34.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 10 MNOK | 20 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −2.3% | 4.3% |
| Profit margin | −3.0% | 3.9% |
| Return on assets | −5.2% | 9.7% |
| Equity ratio | −21.5% | 34.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.59 |
| Current ratio | 0.82 | 1.45 |
| Revenue growth | – | 6.2% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 8, Intercel Logistics AS does better than 1% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,392 companies) in 2025.
Score over time
Score over time needs at least two fiscal years with a score. It will appear when next year's figures are fetched or history is imported.
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
34 days | 49 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−6.1% | −3.3% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
26.2% | 42.5% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−1.0 | 5.3 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
15.3% | 2.0% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.0% | 23.4% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −0.6 MNOK.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Intercel Logistics AS has a score of 8 for 2025, rank 4,921 of 4,996 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 13 against peers, operating margin −2.3% against a median of 4.3%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −21.5% against a median of 34.3%. Consistency: percentile 3 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −21.5% (median 34.3%).
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −1.0 (median 5.3); financial costs as a share of debt 15.3% (median 2.0%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.2 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.82 (median 1.45).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Intercel Logistics AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: transport and storage (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Service prices: transport and storage, annual average | 114.6 | 119.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +4.1% |
| The company's operating margin | −2.3% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: transport and storage (49–53, incl. shipping) (indeks (2021 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: transport and storage (49–53, incl. shipping), annual average | 99.6 | 124.2 | 125.0 | 128.8 | 132.2 | 137.4 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −2.2% | +24.7% | +0.7% | +3.1% | +2.6% | +3.9% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | −2.3% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Oil price (export price of crude oil) (kr per fat)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil price (export price of crude oil), annual average | 609 | 979 | 877 | 859 | 708 | 881 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +61.1% | +60.8% | −10.5% | −2.0% | −17.6% | +24.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | −2.3% | – |
Source: SSB (08799, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | −2.3% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | −2.3% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: land transport (indeks)
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: land transport, annual average | 87.5 | 91.1 | 95.7 | 101.0 | 106.2 | 108.9 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.3% | +4.1% | +5.1% | +5.5% | +5.1% | +2.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | – | −2.3% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Intercel Logistics AS had an operating margin of −2.3% and an equity ratio of −21.5% in 2025, and ranks 4,921 of 4,996 in Transport og lagring.
From 2024 to 2025: the equity ratio fell from 100.0% to −21.5% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.6 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 17.7 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.8 | not meaningful |
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (52): Transportation.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −21.5% (median 34.3%).
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −1.0 (median 5.3); Financial costs as a share of debt 15.3% (median 2.0%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.2 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.82 (median 1.45).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −3.0% (median 3.9%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −2.3% (median 4.3%).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −6.1% (median −3.3%); Current ratio 0.82 (median 1.45).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 15.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 1.8%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 13 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 11 | weight 5% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 3 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Index version 3. Data completeness 75%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Intercel Logistics AS?
The operating margin was −2.3% in 2025, against a median of 4.3% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was −5.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Intercel Logistics AS?
The equity ratio was −21.5% in 2025 (median 34.3%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Intercel Logistics AS like?
The current ratio was 0.82 in 2025 (median 1.45). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Intercel Logistics AS compare in Transport og lagring?
Intercel Logistics AS ranks 4,921 of 4,996 in Transport og lagring for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 1,377 of 1,392.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics Partner AS |  Lion |
23 MNOK | 22.0% | 74 |
| KM TRANSPORT & Spedisjon AS |  Beaver |
18 MNOK | −1.3% | 30 |
| Oslo Budservice AS | Beaver |
15 MNOK | −42.7% | 1 |
| Scanpartners International AS | Lion |
15 MNOK | 17.0% | 85 |
| Business Air Service AS | Lion |
13 MNOK | 10.7% | 69 |
| Intercel Logistics AS (this company) | Beaver |
10 MNOK | −2.3% | 8 |
| Connexus AS |  Cheetah |
7 MNOK | 7.8% | 58 |
| Strait Air Transport AS |  Elephant |
5 MNOK | 1.8% | 39 |
| Skylog AS | Beaver |
4 MNOK | 2.3% | 32 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 934939220
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Transport og lagring (52.312)
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 12 December 2024 1 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Nordbyveien 66, 1734 HAFSLUNDSØY (SARPSBORG)
- Municipality
- Sarpsborg rank 10 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 6 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 9 November 2026.
Year by year · 2024–2025
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 8 | |
| Rank | – | 4,921 | |
| Operating margin | – | −2.3% | |
| Return on assets | 0.0% | −5.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 100.0% | −21.5% | |
| Current ratio | – | 0.82 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | 10.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | – | −0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Tax expense | – | – |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.0 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 1.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | −0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 1.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | – | 1.6 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 9 November 2026, accounts id 7129429.
Further
Similar companies
- Vip Bergen AS index 9, rank 4,918 · compare
- Jakub Kasperski AS index 8, rank 4,920 · compare
- Kystbudet AS index 8, rank 4,922 · compare
- Råkil Bulk og Tanktransport AS index 8, rank 4,927 · compare
- Gartner Norway AS index 8, rank 4,929 · compare