Dento AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Key facts
Is the company run well?
Five key figures against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Green is better than most, amber about like the industry and red weaker than most.
- Profitability · operating margin 55.8% Better than the industry Industry: 7.7%
- Returns · return on assets 67.8% Better than the industry Industry: 16.1%
- Solidity · equity ratio 1.9% Weaker than the industry Industry: 39.3%
- Liquidity · current ratio 0.99 Weaker than the industry Industry: 1.41
- Growth · revenue growth 3.7% About like the industry Industry: 5.4%
The mark comes from the company's place among comparable companies (percentile): green from 60, amber from 40, red below 40. Negative equity, an operating loss and a current ratio under 1 pull it down regardless. Methodology
Score · fiscal year 2025
50of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 47 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 457 of 862 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 3,488 of 6,597 · Helse og omsorg
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 93 and resilience 18 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Dento AS is 1 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 862 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 55.8% (median 7.7%) and equity ratio 1.9% (median 39.3%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 12 % from 2023 to 2025, to 15.7 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 67.7% in 2023 to 55.8% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 6.7% in 2023 to 1.9% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Accounts in short
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 14.1 MNOK | 15.1 MNOK | 15.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 9.5 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 8.8 MNOK |
| Net profit | 7.6 MNOK | 8.5 MNOK | 7.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.4 MNOK | 12.2 MNOK | 13.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.7 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 9.7 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 13.0 MNOK |
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK). See every figure year by year
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 943159904
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Helse og omsorg (86.230)
- Purpose
- Tannlegevirksomhet, salg, investering og delta i annen virksomhet.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 8 registered 10 November 2025
- Founded
- 2 January 1987 39 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Storgata 174, 3915 PORSGRUNN
- Municipality
- Porsgrunn rank 5–12 of 13 in KOSTRA group 10
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- No
- Former names
- Meda AS until 2005
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Dento AS has a score of 50 for 2025, rank 3,488 of 6,597 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 93 against peers, operating margin 55.8% against a median of 7.7%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 8 against peers, equity ratio 1.9% against a median of 39.3%. Growth: percentile 24 against peers, revenue growth 3.7% against a median of 5.4%.
Worth a closer look
- The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity? Based on: equity ratio 1.9% (median 39.3%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.99 (median 1.41).
- Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed? Based on: net working capital to revenue −82.9% (median −6.8%); current ratio 0.99 (median 1.41).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- watch
The equity ratio is very low. Could the company absorb a bad year, and does it need more equity?
Based on: Equity ratio 1.9% (median 39.3%).
- watch
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 1.0 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.99 (median 1.41).
- watch
Current liabilities exceed current assets other than bank deposits, and the current ratio is weak. Is it customer prepayments and supplier credit that fund the operations, or short-term loans that must be renewed?
Based on: Net working capital to revenue −82.9% (median −6.8%); Current ratio 0.99 (median 1.41).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 0.0% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of −10.4%. Based on the 8 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 93 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 8 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 26 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 24 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 34 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 60 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 16 MNOK | 16 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 55.8% | 7.7% |
| Profit margin | 57.4% | 7.1% |
| Return on assets | 67.8% | 16.1% |
| Equity ratio | 1.9% | 39.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 51.10 | 1.40 |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.41 |
| Revenue growth | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Revenue per employee | 1.96 MNOK | 1.45 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 50, Dento AS does better than 47% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (862 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Dento AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 28 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 2 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
−82.9% | −6.8% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
99.9% | 60.6% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
– | 26.9 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
0.0% | 0.6% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 25.1% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): −13.0 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.0 MNOK, 0.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
Returns, debt against earnings and quality
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returns | |||
| Return on equity (ROE) Net result over the average of equity at the start and end of the year (the end alone when last year is missing). Not calculated with negative equity. |
401.8% | 29.7% | |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) Operating result over capital employed, that is total assets less current liabilities. The return regardless of how the company is financed. |
3,438.9% | 25.3% | |
| Net margin Net result over revenue. The first part of the DuPont split of return on equity. |
44.7% | 6.2% | |
| Asset turnover (revenue over assets) Revenue over total assets: how many kroner of revenue each krone of assets gives. The second part of the DuPont split. |
1.18 | 2.03 | |
| Equity multiplier Total assets over equity: 4 means three quarters is financed with debt. The third part of the DuPont split. |
52.10 | 2.40 | |
| Debt and financing | |||
| Net debt in times operating result Long-term liabilities less cash, over the operating result: roughly how many years the business must earn to repay the debt. A negative figure means more cash than long-term debt. Rough, because the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. Only calculated when the operating result is positive. |
– | −0.5 | |
| Fixed-asset cover Equity plus long-term liabilities over fixed assets (total assets less current assets). Below 1: fixed assets are partly financed with short-term debt. |
– | 1.26 | |
| Quick ratio (without inventory) Cash plus receivables over current liabilities. Like the current ratio but without inventory and short-term investments. |
0.99 | 1.27 | |
| Quality and resilience | |||
| Effective tax rate Tax expense over profit before tax, only when the profit is positive. Far from 22% points to one-off items, tax losses carried forward or group contributions. |
22.1% | 22.0% | |
| Operating leverage Percentage change in operating result over percentage change in revenue from last year. 3 means a 1% fall in revenue gives a 3% fall in operating result. Only calculated when revenue moved at least 2% and last year's operating result was positive. |
−4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Payroll costs over revenue Payroll costs (with employer's contribution and pension) over revenue. Shows how much of revenue is a fixed cost in a service business. |
32.3% | 37.0% | |
| Revenue safety margin How far revenue can fall before the operating result is zero, assuming payroll is fixed and all other costs follow revenue. A calculation, not a measurement: depreciation and rent are also fixed, so reality is lower. |
63.4% | 26.0% | |
| Cash runway (months) Cash over the operating loss per month, only for years with a loss. Assumes the loss continues unchanged and no new financing arrives. Capped at 120 months. |
– | 37 mo. | |
DuPont on the closing balance: net margin 44.7% × asset turnover 1.18 × multiplier 52.10 = 2,751.7% of equity at the end of the year. The return on equity above uses average equity and can differ slightly.
The median and the bar are for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: high is not always good. The figures are our own calculations from the annual accounts and do not count in the score. Open data has no depreciation, so no EBITDA, and the accounts do not split out interest-bearing debt. How we calculate
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Dento AS fell by 14.2 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.1 points. So the company did 14.2 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Dento AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 10% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 70.1% | 7.8% | +2.4 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points |
| 2025 | 55.8% | 7.7% | −14.2 percentage points | −0.1 percentage points | −14.2 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Dento AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Dento AS fell 14.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 67.7% | 70.1% | 55.8% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Dento AS fell 14.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 67.7% | 70.1% | 55.8% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: health services (indeks)
Wage index: health services rose 5.1% in 2025; the operating margin of Dento AS fell 14.2 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: health services, annual average | 88.0 | 91.6 | 96.0 | 100.6 | 105.8 | 109.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +2.5% | +4.1% | +4.7% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +3.6% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 67.7% | 70.1% | 55.8% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Dento AS had an operating margin of 55.8% and an equity ratio of 1.9% in 2025, and ranks 3,488 of 6,597 in Helse og omsorg.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 70.1% to 55.8% and the equity ratio fell from 26.5% to 1.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
Suggested price: about 88 MNOK
The mean of the 3 methods below (P/E, EV/EBIT and P/B with listed multiples and a size adjustment), rounded to two significant figures. It is a calculation, not a bid or a valuation. The median of the methods is 99 MNOK. The mean is the suggested price, but the median is less sensitive to one method that deviates. The methods differ widely (the highest is 871.0 times the lowest), so the estimate is uncertain.
That is about 88,000 NOK per share, on 1,000 shares in the shareholder register.
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 166 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.8 | 99 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 23.4 | 166 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.1 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 225 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 154 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −13 MNOK |
| Equity value | 166 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 3% on the cost of equity gives a value 32% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (86): Hospitals/Healthcare Facilities.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Figures you will not find in any register
We calculated these figures ourselves from the accounts and registers we have read. The company has not reported them and the Brønnøysund Register Centre does not publish them. They are indications and are not part of the index. How we calculate
- Personnel cost per registered employee
- 0.63 MNOK per registered employee in 2025
Comparable companies have a median of 0.55 MNOK. This company is above 60% of them (711 companies in the same industry and size class).
Payroll costs are 32% of revenue.
Payroll costs in the accounts divided by 8 employees in the business register. Payroll costs include employer's contribution and pension, so they are higher than wages. The employee count is a snapshot and can differ from the average over the accounting year. - Implied dividend (net payout)
- 10.0 MNOK left equity beyond the result in 2025.
That equals 143% of the year's result.
More left than the company earned in the year.
Over 2 years it equals 103% of the sum of the results.
Calculated as retained earnings at the start of the year + net result − retained earnings at the end of the year. What remains is dividends and group contributions, plus transfers to other items and corrections of earlier years. It is not a dividend figure. - Owners and leadership aged 60 or older
- No sign of a near generation change in the ages.
- The chair is under 60.
- The managing director is under 60.
- 0 of 1 on the board are 60 or older.
- What the largest owner can do alone
- The largest owner holds 100.0% of the shares, more than nine tenths. The owner is a company and can then buy out the other shareholders by compulsion (Norwegian Companies Act § 4-26), provided it also holds the corresponding share of the votes. Every other decision the owner can secure alone.
The owner is a Norwegian company.
Applies to the largest single owner in the shareholder register (2025). The articles can limit voting rights and owners can vote together, and we cannot see either. Ownership through other companies is not counted. - Control against ownership through the chain
- A private person holds a majority at each of 2 links and so controls the company, but owns at least 67% of it itself.
The top owner is the highest we can establish, and it can itself be owned by others. The figure is «at least» because other routes between the owner and the company only add to it. The articles can limit voting rights, and we cannot see that. Shareholder register (2025).
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Questions and answers
How profitable is Dento AS?
The operating margin was 55.8% in 2025, against a median of 7.7% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 67.8%.
How solid is Dento AS?
The equity ratio was 1.9% in 2025 (median 39.3%). Debt-to-equity was 51.10 (median 1.40).
What is the liquidity of Dento AS like?
The current ratio was 0.99 in 2025 (median 1.41). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Dento AS compare in Helse og omsorg?
Dento AS ranks 3,488 of 6,597 in Helse og omsorg for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 457 of 862. Revenue changed by 3.7% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fjelltannlegene AS |  Cheetah |
17 MNOK | 26.6% | 52 |
| Odontia 11 AS | Cheetah |
16 MNOK | 10.3% | 45 |
| Opalia Trondheim AS | Cheetah |
16 MNOK | 4.8% | 55 |
| Tannlege Ole Henrik Nag AS |  Lion |
16 MNOK | 9.2% | 61 |
| Dento AS (this company) | Cheetah |
16 MNOK | 55.8% | 50 |
| Forus Tannhelse AS | Lion |
15 MNOK | 28.8% | 76 |
| TANNKLINIKKEN BØVRE & CO AS | Cheetah |
15 MNOK | 26.8% | 64 |
| Tannklinikken Jack Kuvaas AS | Lion |
15 MNOK | 36.1% | 84 |
| Spesialistklinikk AS |  Elephant |
14 MNOK | 3.3% | 47 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
3 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 67% of the shares in Clh Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Clh Holding AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Helse og omsorg (2 companies), Eiendom (1 company) 3 of 3 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 8 in all. Porsgrunn 8 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Clh Village AS.
-
Clh Holding AS
- Dento AS you are here
- Clh Village AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Clh Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Clh Holding AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 2 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): Clh Holding AS
Holds shares in: Yara International ASA (0%)
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 6 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 61 | 69 | 50 | |
| Rank | 1,881 | 975 | 3,488 | |
| Operating margin | 67.7% | 70.1% | 55.8% | |
| Return on assets | 93.3% | 89.7% | 67.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 6.7% | 26.5% | 1.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.29 | 0.99 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 7.6% | 3.7% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 14.1 MNOK | 15.1 MNOK | 15.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 9.5 MNOK | 10.6 MNOK | 8.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 9.7 MNOK | 10.9 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 2.1 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 7.6 MNOK | 8.5 MNOK | 7.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.4 MNOK | 12.2 MNOK | 13.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 9.7 MNOK | 11.6 MNOK | 12.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.7 MNOK | 3.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.6 MNOK | 3.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 9.7 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 13.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 9.7 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | 13.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 6 November 2026, accounts id 6692454.
Further
Similar companies
- Optimus AS index 50, rank 3,482 · compare
- Drammen Øyelegesenter AS index 50, rank 3,496 · compare
- Tønsberg Tannregulering AS index 50, rank 3,497 · compare
- Vest Helse og Trening AS index 50, rank 3,498 · compare
- Tannlegekompaniet AS index 50, rank 3,502 · compare
News and announcements
- 11 November 2025 Endring av revisor (opens in a new tab) Source: Brønnøysundregistrene
From official sources: the Brønnøysund Register Centre, Oslo Børs NewsWeb and public agencies. We show the title, date and a link to the source. The link to a company, sector or municipality is automatic and may be wrong. Report a wrong link