Concept Tech AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
71of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 89 % of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Small: 161 of 1,479 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 708 of 6,322 · Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 82 and resilience 42 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Concept Tech AS is 20 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,479 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 15.1% (median 5.0%) and equity ratio 20.0% (median 27.3%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue rose by 389 % from 2024 to 2025, to 30.5 MNOK. The operating margin rose from 0.7% in 2024 to 15.1% in 2025. The equity ratio fell from 100.0% in 2023 to 20.0% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Concept Tech AS has a score of 71 for 2025, rank 708 of 6,322 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 95 against peers, revenue growth 389.3% against a median of 7.1%. Liquidity: percentile 89 against peers, current ratio 2.96 against a median of 1.27.
Weakest: Consistency: percentile 29 against peers. Solidity: percentile 38 against peers, equity ratio 20.0% against a median of 27.3%.
Worth a closer look
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- The change in operating margin in 2025 was 13.9 percentage points better than for comparable companies: the company +14.5, the industry +0.5 points. That is the company's own, not something that hit the whole industry.
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
No rules were triggered for this year.
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 18.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 0.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 82 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 38 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 89 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 95 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 29 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 50 (average over 2 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 30 MNOK | 19 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 15.1% | 5.0% |
| Profit margin | 8.8% | 5.0% |
| Return on assets | 34.3% | 11.8% |
| Equity ratio | 20.0% | 27.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 4.00 | 2.22 |
| Current ratio | 2.96 | 1.27 |
| Revenue growth | 389.3% | 7.1% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 71, Concept Tech AS does better than 89% of companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector (1,479 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Concept Tech AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
35 days | 54 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
0 days | 0 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
1.3% | −6.1% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
60.8% | 40.8% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
2.3 | 8.8 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
18.5% | 1.2% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
– | 19.4% | |
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 0.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 2.0 MNOK, 2.0 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose by 14.5 percentage points. Comparable companies rose by a median 0.5 points. So the company did 13.9 points better than the industry, for reasons of its own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15.1% | 5.0% | +14.5 percentage points | +0.5 percentage points | +13.9 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Concept Tech AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Service prices: business support services (indeks (2021 = 100))
Service prices: business support services rose 3.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose 14.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service prices: business support services, annual average | 100.0 | 104.9 | 111.1 | 116.9 | 121.3 | 122.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | – | +4.9% | +5.9% | +5.2% | +3.8% | +0.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14335, CC BY 4.0). Source
Turnover index: administrative and support services (indeks (2021 = 100))
Turnover index: administrative and support services rose 5.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose 14.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turnover index: administrative and support services, annual average | 99.5 | 117.4 | 126.0 | 130.8 | 138.4 | 141.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +5.3% | +17.9% | +7.4% | +3.8% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | – |
Source: SSB (13863, CC BY 4.0). Source
Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))
Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose 14.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer price index, annual average | 84.3 | 89.2 | 94.1 | 97.0 | 100.0 | 103.0 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | – |
Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source
Policy rate (prosent)
Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose 14.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy rate, annual average | 0.08 | 1.32 | 3.54 | 4.50 | 4.30 | 4.17 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −0.28 percentage points | +1.24 percentage points | +2.22 percentage points | +0.96 percentage points | −0.20 percentage points | −0.12 percentage points |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: business support services (indeks)
Wage index: business support services rose 5.7% in 2025; the operating margin of Concept Tech AS rose 14.5 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: business support services, annual average | 81.5 | 85.5 | 89.7 | 94.8 | 100.3 | 106.3 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.5% | +4.9% | +4.9% | +5.7% | +5.7% | +6.0% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Concept Tech AS had an operating margin of 15.1% and an equity ratio of 20.0% in 2025, and ranks 708 of 6,322 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting.
From 2024 to 2025: revenue grew by 389% and the operating margin rose from 0.7% to 15.1%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 5 MNOK and 18 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 17.3 | 9 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 14.1 | 18 MNOK |
| P/B | 2.7 | 5 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 22 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 13 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −4 MNOK |
| Equity value | 18 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt. Net debt is −33% of the enterprise value after the size adjustment, so the equity value from EV/EBIT is sensitive to errors in the debt figure.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 4% on the cost of equity gives a value 38% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The NACE code has no listed industry of its own in the table, so the multiples are the sector median: Business & Consumer Services, Office Equipment & Services.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Concept Tech AS?
The operating margin was 15.1% in 2025, against a median of 5.0% among companies in the Morning class Small in the same sector. Return on assets was 34.3%.
How solid is Concept Tech AS?
The equity ratio was 20.0% in 2025 (median 27.3%). Debt-to-equity was 4.00 (median 2.22).
What is the liquidity of Concept Tech AS like?
The current ratio was 2.96 in 2025 (median 1.27).
How does Concept Tech AS compare in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting?
Concept Tech AS ranks 708 of 6,322 in Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Small it is number 161 of 1,479. Revenue changed by 389.3% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grieg Maritime Group AS |  Elephant |
42 MNOK | −74.9% | 32 |
| Hydro Service AS |  Beaver |
37 MNOK | 4.3% | 43 |
| Deepocean Shipping AS |  Lion |
36 MNOK | 60.9% | 79 |
| Marø Havbruk Eigedom AS | Lion |
35 MNOK | 35.2% | 67 |
| Bta Florø AS | Beaver |
31 MNOK | 1.1% | 30 |
| Concept Tech AS (this company) |  Cheetah |
30 MNOK | 15.1% | 71 |
| Atlantic Feeder IV AS | Lion |
26 MNOK | 33.1% | 67 |
| Gasmar AS | Cheetah |
26 MNOK | 56.0% | 47 |
| Fsv Services AS | Beaver |
23 MNOK | −134.2% | 6 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
5 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Infuture Invest AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Infuture Invest AS has not filed group accounts in open data, so the group has no index of its own. Each company has its own accounts.
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Bygg og anlegg (2 companies), Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (1 company), Eiendom (1 company), Teknisk tjenesteyting og forskning (1 company) 5 of 5 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 21 in all. Østre Toten 21 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Diveservice AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 1 company joined the group: Medical Business Consulting AS.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
-
Infuture Invest AS
- Concept Tech AS you are here
- Diveservice AS
- Concept Eiendom AS
- Medical Business Consulting AS
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 989383531
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Forretningsmessig tjenesteyting (77.340)
- Purpose
- Investeringer i tekniske utstyr, driftsutstyr og virksomheter samt konsulent tjenester. Konsulentvirksomhet innen teknisk rådgiving og strategi.
- Morning company class
- Small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 6 January 2006 20 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.20 MNOK
- Business address
- Fabrikkvegen 52, 2849 KAPP (ØSTRE TOTEN)
- Municipality
- Østre Toten rank 17–33 of 38 in KOSTRA group 7
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.diveservice.no
- Former names
- Lucana AS until 2024, Hedopp Eiendomsutvikling AS until 2013
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 7 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 2 (one owner holds more than half)
- Largest owner
- 50.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Infuture Invest AS (50%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Infuture Invest AS · 50.0%
- Sylbra Invest AS · 50.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (2 new and 2 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): Infuture Invest AS, Sylbra Invest AS
Departed (companies): Arkitekt Rune Tobiassen AS, Service og Eiendom AS
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 10 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 29 | 71 | |
| Rank | – | 4,973 | 708 | |
| Operating margin | – | 0.7% | 15.1% | |
| Return on assets | −5.3% | 0.5% | 34.3% | |
| Equity ratio | 100.0% | 1.7% | 20.0% | |
| Current ratio | – | 5.22 | 2.96 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | 389.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | 6.2 MNOK | 30.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 4.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.0 MNOK | – | 0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | 0.0 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.4 MNOK | 14.7 MNOK | 13.7 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.4 MNOK | 3.7 MNOK | 7.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −1.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 14.5 MNOK | 11.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 2.5 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 10 November 2026, accounts id 6495043.
Further
Similar companies
- Viking Adventure AS index 72, rank 691 · compare
- EF Education First AS index 72, rank 699 · compare
- Toma Security AS index 71, rank 719 · compare
- PS Selskapsutleie AS index 71, rank 727 · compare
- X-Stillas AS index 71, rank 731 · compare