Containertech AS
Not financial advice. The index, rank, signals and advice are rule-based indications from the latest filed annual accounts. They are not a credit rating, an assessment of management or a recommendation to buy, sell or do business with the company. Read more
Score · fiscal year 2025
31of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 16 % of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Medium: 1,147 of 1,373 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 5,809 of 7,073 · Industri
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high resilience
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 15 and resilience 66 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Containertech AS is 20 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,373 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −2.6% (median 5.0%) and equity ratio 54.8% (median 39.3%).
How it has gone · 2023–2025
Revenue fell by 22 % from 2023 to 2025, to 149.7 MNOK. The operating margin fell from 16.1% in 2023 to −2.6% in 2025. The equity ratio rose from 45.2% in 2023 to 54.8% in 2025.
Amounts in the reporting currency. The full year-by-year table is further down under «Details». See every figure year by year
Containertech AS has a score of 31 for 2025, rank 5,809 of 7,073 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 74 against peers, current ratio 2.15 against a median of 1.54. Solidity: percentile 73 against peers, equity ratio 54.8% against a median of 39.3%.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 9 against peers, revenue growth −16.9% against a median of 7.1%. Profitability: percentile 15 against peers, operating margin −2.6% against a median of 5.0%.
Worth a closer look
- The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say? Based on: interest coverage (times) −4.6 (median 5.5); financial costs as a share of debt 2.2% (median 2.9%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −2.7% (median 4.8%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −2.6% (median 5.0%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
Worth a closer look
- critical
The operating result does not cover the financial costs. How will the debt be serviced, and what do the lenders say?
Based on: Interest coverage (times) −4.6 (median 5.5); Financial costs as a share of debt 2.2% (median 2.9%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −2.7% (median 4.8%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −2.6% (median 5.0%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.2% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 15 | weight 40% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 73 | weight 20% |
| Liquidity | 74 | weight 5% |
| Growth | 9 | weight 25% |
| Consistency | 50 | weight 10% |
Three goals: profitability 40%, growth 25%, resilience 35%. Why these weights?
Durability: 56 (average over 3 years)
Index version 3. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 150 MNOK | 114 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −2.6% | 5.0% |
| Profit margin | −2.7% | 4.8% |
| Return on assets | −3.7% | 10.5% |
| Equity ratio | 54.8% | 39.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.82 | 1.50 |
| Current ratio | 2.15 | 1.54 |
| Revenue growth | −16.9% | 7.1% |
| Revenue per employee | 3.57 MNOK | 2.95 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 31, Containertech AS does better than 16% of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector (1,373 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Containertech AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector
Working capital and debt
| Measure | Company | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital | |||
| Receivable days All current receivables, including those on group companies, in days of revenue. |
108 days | 68 days | |
| Inventory and other current assets, days Current assets other than receivables and bank deposits, that is inventory and short-term investments, in days of revenue. |
89 days | 36 days | |
| Net working capital to revenue Current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities, divided by revenue. Negative: short-term debt funds the operations. |
28.3% | 6.4% | |
| Cash share of current assets How much of the short-term buffer is bank deposits and cash. |
1.8% | 10.6% | |
| Debt and interest burden | |||
| Interest coverage (times) Operating result divided by all financial costs. Below 1: operations do not cover the cost of the debt. |
−4.6 | 5.5 | |
| Financial costs as a share of debt All financial costs (interest, currency losses and other) divided by all debt, interest-free debt included. Not an interest rate. |
2.2% | 2.9% | |
| Long-term share of debt Long-term debt as a share of all debt. A low share means more falls due within a year. |
0.8% | 15.7% | |
The operating result is negative, so the interest coverage is negative: operations cover none of the financial costs.
Net working capital (current assets less bank deposits less current liabilities): 42.4 MNOK.
Of the financial costs of 0.8 MNOK, 0.5 MNOK is reported as interest costs in the accounts.
The median and the bar refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of the group with a lower figure: higher is not always better, long receivable days tie up capital, for example. These figures do not count in the score.
The industry or the company: what drove the result?
In 2025 the operating margin of Containertech AS fell by 8.8 percentage points. Comparable companies fell by a median 0.4 points. So the company did 8.4 points weaker than the industry, for reasons of its own.
Over 2 year-to-year changes Containertech AS moved the same way as comparable companies 1 times. About 3% of the changes in operating margin were common to the industry; the rest was the company's own.
| Year | The company | Comparable (median) | Change, company | Change, industry | The company's own |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.3% | 5.4% | −9.8 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points | −10.0 percentage points |
| 2025 | −2.6% | 5.0% | −8.8 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points | −8.4 percentage points |
Comparable companies are those in the same industry and Morning company class. Their change shows what hit the whole industry, the sector drivers below included. The rest is the company's own: contracts, costs, one-off items or operations. The share is approximate, and we claim no cause.
The company and its sector's drivers
Prices, rate and currency that shape the sector's year, year by year beside the operating margin of Containertech AS. The figures stand side by side; we claim no cause.
Producer prices in manufacturing (indeks (2021 = 100))
Producer prices in manufacturing rose 2.9% in 2025; the operating margin of Containertech AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer prices in manufacturing, annual average | 100.0 | 124.7 | 129.5 | 134.4 | 138.3 | 146.7 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +10.7% | +24.7% | +3.9% | +3.7% | +2.9% | +6.1% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | – |
Source: SSB (12462, CC BY 4.0). Source
EUR/NOK (kr)
EUR/NOK rose 0.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Containertech AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/NOK, annual average | 10.16 | 10.10 | 11.42 | 11.62 | 11.72 | 11.04 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −5.2% | −0.6% | +13.1% | +1.8% | +0.8% | −5.8% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wholesale power price (øre per kWh)
Wholesale power price rose 9.4% in 2025; the operating margin of Containertech AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholesale power price, annual average | 64.2 | 141.7 | 72.0 | 49.4 | 54.0 | 96.5 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +466.7% | +120.8% | −49.2% | −31.4% | +9.4% | +78.4% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | – |
Source: SSB (09363, CC BY 4.0). Source
USD/NOK (kr)
USD/NOK fell 3.3% in 2025; the operating margin of Containertech AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD/NOK, annual average | 8.59 | 9.61 | 10.56 | 10.75 | 10.39 | 9.54 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | −8.8% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +1.7% | −3.3% | −8.2% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | – |
Source: Norges Bank (EXR, NLOD 2.0). Source
Wage index: fabricated metal products (indeks)
Wage index: fabricated metal products rose 5.8% in 2025; the operating margin of Containertech AS fell 8.8 percentage points.
| Measure | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wage index: fabricated metal products, annual average | 88.0 | 91.5 | 96.9 | 102.1 | 108.0 | 112.8 (so far) |
| Change from the year before | +3.1% | +3.9% | +6.0% | +5.4% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| The company's operating margin | – | – | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | – |
Source: SSB (12314, CC BY 4.0). Source
We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.
What the numbers say
Containertech AS had an operating margin of −2.6% and an equity ratio of 54.8% in 2025, and ranks 5,809 of 7,073 in Industri.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a profit to a loss before tax and the operating margin fell from 6.3% to −2.6%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 128 MNOK and 176 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 25.8 | 176 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 19.1 | 166 MNOK |
| P/B | 4.0 | 128 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT: from enterprise value to equity | NOK |
|---|---|
| Enterprise value (EV) at the listed multiple | 243 MNOK |
| Enterprise value after the size adjustment | 165 MNOK |
| Less net debt (rough figure) | −1 MNOK |
| Equity value | 166 MNOK |
Net debt is a rough figure: long-term liabilities minus cash. The accounts do not split interest-bearing debt from other liabilities, and short-term borrowings are not included. The size adjustment applies to the enterprise value, not to the debt.
The listed basis is the value at listed multiples. The estimate is lowered for size: a small-company premium of 3% on the cost of equity gives a value 32% lower. No separate marketability discount is applied, because the premium already allows for the company being small and unlisted.
The multiples are from the listed industry that matches the NACE code (28): Machinery.
Not financial advice. The value range is a rough model estimate from listed-company multiples, not a valuation, a price target or a price offer. The actual value may differ greatly. Read more
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Questions and answers
How profitable is Containertech AS?
The operating margin was −2.6% in 2025, against a median of 5.0% among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector. Return on assets was −3.7%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Containertech AS?
The equity ratio was 54.8% in 2025 (median 39.3%). Debt-to-equity was 0.82 (median 1.50).
What is the liquidity of Containertech AS like?
The current ratio was 2.15 in 2025 (median 1.54).
How does Containertech AS compare in Industri?
Containertech AS ranks 5,809 of 7,073 in Industri for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Medium it is number 1,147 of 1,373. Revenue changed by −16.9% from the year before.
Competitors
The 8 closest competitors in the same line of business, placed in the same matrix as the sector page: profitability up, resilience to the right. These are the companies the competitor analysis and the strategy report compare with.
Each bubble is a company: this company and its closest competitors in the same line of business and size, the same ones the competitor analysis uses. Placement is 0–100 against the whole sector and Morning company class: further right is more robust, higher up is more profitable. Bubble size is revenue. The light bubble and arrow show where the company stood the year before. Pick a profile to see fewer at a time.
| Company | Profile | Operating revenue | Operating margin | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andersen Mek Verksted AS |  Beaver |
398 MNOK | 0.4% | 33 |
| Containertech AS (this company) |  Elephant |
150 MNOK | −2.6% | 31 |
| Tokvam AS |  Lion |
147 MNOK | 9.4% | 71 |
| Ceg Norway AS | Elephant |
145 MNOK | 1.7% | 39 |
| Lyng Drilling AS | Lion |
111 MNOK | 9.0% | 64 |
| Qmatec Drilling AS | Beaver |
106 MNOK | −6.4% | 15 |
| Bamble Mekaniske Industri AS | Elephant |
91 MNOK | 2.3% | 40 |
| Steis Mekaniske Verksted AS | Beaver |
67 MNOK | 5.1% | 51 |
| Vera Tank AS | Elephant |
52 MNOK | 1.4% | 58 |
The selection is the closest in revenue within the same industry code. When you order, you can swap competitors. Order competitor analysis
Group structure · 2025
15 companies in the group according to the shareholder register for 2025. A company counts as a subsidiary when a Norwegian company owns more than half of its shares.
Private persons own 100% of the shares in Piiin Holding AS. Persons are not shown by name.
Group accounts. Piiin Holding AS for 2025: index 25 of 100, number 87 of 97 groups. See the group accounts
The group in figures
- Sectors
- Industri (5 companies), Overnatting og servering (3 companies), Eiendom (4 companies), Informasjon og kommunikasjon (1 company), Vann, avløp og renovasjon (1 company) 14 of 15 companies in the tree have accounts with us. Sectors are sorted by the companies' own revenue, which includes sales between the group's companies.
- Employees in Norway
- 344 in all. Flekkefjord 242, Farsund 46, Bygland 42, Kristiansand 14 Registered employees in the Central Coordinating Register, by the municipality of the business address. Employees may work elsewhere.
- Negative equity
- 1 company: Toxiclean AS
- Loss
- 4 companies: Containertech AS, Svegeskogen 11 AS, Toxiclean AS, Mirakas AS
- Changed 2024–2025
- 2 companies joined the group: Clevio AS, Amv Newco AS. 1 company left.
A subsidiary with negative equity or a loss may be backed by the group, for example with group contributions or guarantees. It is an indication of what is worth asking about, not an assessment.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register 2025 (majority owner with more than 50 % of the shares). Voting agreements and ownership through other countries are not included.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 991282882
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Industri (28.920)
- Purpose
- Å drive utvikling, produksjon, kjøp, salg og support av maskiner, containere, renseanlegg og lignende til tunnel, anlegg, gruve og industri, samt hva som måtte stå i forbindelse med dette.
- Morning company class
- Medium
- Employees
- 42 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 10 May 2007 19 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.10 MNOK
- Business address
- Nesmoen 25, 4745 BYGLAND
- Municipality
- Bygland rank 3–14 of 25 in KOSTRA group 14
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- VAT registered
- Yes
- Website
- www.containertech.no
- LEI
- 5493001DSFTSW5CSRW05 not renewed (lapsed)
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 31 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- No parent company: owned by persons
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 100% · private persons 0% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 0%
- Group chain
-
Owned by: Containertech Holding AS (100%)
Ultimate owner: private person
- Containertech Holding AS · 100.0%
Change 2007–2025:
100% of the shares changed owner (1 new and 2 departed owners). The majority owner changed.
New owners (companies): Containertech Holding AS
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Is this your company? Suggest changes or add information
Figures last fetched 4 November 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 80 | 58 | 31 | |
| Rank | 512 | 2,478 | 5,809 | |
| Operating margin | 16.1% | 6.3% | −2.6% | |
| Return on assets | 35.5% | 16.5% | −3.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 45.2% | 65.8% | 54.8% | |
| Current ratio | 1.86 | 2.99 | 2.15 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −5.6% | −16.9% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 190.8 MNOK | 180.2 MNOK | 149.7 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 30.7 MNOK | 11.3 MNOK | −3.8 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 30.7 MNOK | 11.4 MNOK | −4.0 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 6.7 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | −1.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 24.0 MNOK | 9.0 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.2 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Total assets | 89.9 MNOK | 74.1 MNOK | 85.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 85.5 MNOK | 69.9 MNOK | 82.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 40.6 MNOK | 48.7 MNOK | 46.9 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 37.1 MNOK | 45.2 MNOK | 42.3 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 49.3 MNOK | 25.3 MNOK | 38.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 45.9 MNOK | 23.4 MNOK | 38.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 4 November 2026, accounts id 6857284.
Further
Similar companies
- Bewi Norway AS index 31, rank 5,794 · compare
- Nærbakst Øst AS index 31, rank 5,801 · compare
- Orkel Direkte AS index 31, rank 5,806 · compare
- Skedsmo Betong AS index 31, rank 5,810 · compare
- Carpenter AS index 31, rank 5,812 · compare