Sector

Revisjon, regnskap og rådgivning

Download sector report (PDF)

17 companies ranked against comparable companies in four Morning company classes. Fiscal year 2022. Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre. Methodology

Ranking · 2022 · Morning class Micro

Morning class Micro · 2022
#CompanyProfileScoreChangeFive years
1 Hollr AS Leader 82 –
2 Ant AS Leader 81 –
3 Executive Decision Support AS Leader 77 –
4 Akkvir AS Steward 70 –
5 Cim AS Leader 54 +7
6 Move Forward AS Steward 53 –
7 Poort Consulting AS Sprinter 48 −5
8 Dagh Consulting AS Sprinter 42 –
9 Alvergruppen AS Sprinter 42 –
10 Asker og Bærum Consult AS Builder 25 –
11 Thaloran AS Builder 23 –
12 Rao AS Builder 2 –

The rank is the rank in the class. A class with fewer than ten companies is compared with the whole sector. Full ranking · Press mode

Biggest moves · Morning class Micro

  • Cim AS

    From 2021 to 2022: the operating margin fell from 19.0% to 15.3% and revenue grew by 11%.

    +7
  • Poort Consulting AS

    From 2021 to 2022: the operating margin rose from 24.6% to 28.2%.

    −5

Top lists in the sector · 2022 · Morning class Micro

The five largest companies account for 44% of the sector's revenue. Combined profit before tax for the 12 ranked companies: 13 MNOK.

Size

The largest by revenue and employees, and who earns the most per employee.

Highest revenue

  1. Cim AS 8 MNOK
  2. Alvergruppen AS 5 MNOK
  3. Asker og Bærum Consult AS 4 MNOK
  4. Rao AS 2 MNOK
  5. Executive Decision Support AS 2 MNOK

Operating revenue.

Most employees

No company meets the requirement this year.

Employees according to the Central Coordinating Register.

Highest revenue per employee

No company meets the requirement this year.

Only companies with at least 5 employees.

Profit and balance

Who earns the most, who loses the most, and who has the strongest balance sheet.

Highest operating margin

  1. Executive Decision Support AS 52.4%
  2. Hollr AS 34.3%
  3. Poort Consulting AS 28.2%
  4. Dagh Consulting AS 17.6%
  5. Cim AS 15.3%

Operating result divided by operating revenue.

Largest profit

  1. Ant AS 12 MNOK
  2. Akkvir AS 3 MNOK
  3. Cim AS 1 MNOK
  4. Executive Decision Support AS 1 MNOK
  5. Hollr AS 1 MNOK

Profit before tax.

Largest loss

  1. Alvergruppen AS −5 MNOK
  2. Rao AS 0 MNOK
  3. Move Forward AS 0 MNOK
  4. Asker og Bærum Consult AS 0 MNOK

Profit before tax, the largest negative.

Most solid

  1. Hollr AS 100.0%
  2. Ant AS 99.4%
  3. Akkvir AS 99.3%
  4. Move Forward AS 79.2%
  5. Executive Decision Support AS 65.2%

Equity ratio: equity divided by total assets.

Growth and movement

Who grows and falls the most in revenue, and who has climbed or fallen the most on the index since the year before.

Fastest growth

No company meets the requirement this year.

Revenue growth from the year before, only from at least NOK 10 million in revenue.

Largest revenue decline

No company meets the requirement this year.

Revenue decline from the year before, only from at least NOK 10 million in revenue.

Biggest climbers

  1. Cim AS +7.1 points

Change in index points from the year before.

Biggest fallers

  1. Poort Consulting AS −4.5 points

Change in index points from the year before.

The lists cover ranked companies in the class: operating companies with at least NOK 1m in revenue, without holding companies and excluded ones. Size lists (revenue, profit, employees) count each group once. Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre. Amounts in other currencies are converted at Norges Bank's rates.

Quadrant analysis

Positions in the sector · 2022 · Morning class Micro

Each company is placed by profitability and solidity, measured as a place from 0 to 100 against the others in the same sector and Morning company class. The bubble shows revenue. Hover over or tap a bubble for the figures, filter by profile or search for a company.

Cim AS: 55 / 52Alvergruppen AS: 55 / 43Asker og Bærum Consult AS: 27 / 24Rao AS: 5 / 0Executive Decision Support AS: 100 / 62Hollr AS: 64 / 100Dagh Consulting AS: 73 / 14Ant AS: 55 / 90Thaloran AS: 36 / 5Akkvir AS: 45 / 81Poort Consulting AS: 73 / 33Move Forward AS: 14 / 7100252550507575100100Solidity, percentile against peers →↑ Profitability, percentile against peers

Bubble size shows relative revenue, not exact figures. Dashed lines show where the 2 companies that moved most stood in 2021 (small ring).

  • Lion · LeaderHigh profitability, high solidity
  • Cheetah · SprinterHigh profitability, lower solidity
  • Elephant · StewardLower profitability, high solidity
  • Beaver · BuilderLower profitability, lower solidity
Show the positions as a list
CompanyProfileProfitabilitySolidityIn 2021 (profitability / solidity)
Executive Decision Support ASLion10062–
Dagh Consulting ASCheetah7314–
Poort Consulting ASCheetah7333100 / 0
Hollr ASLion64100–
Ant ASLion5590–
Cim ASLion55520 / 100
Alvergruppen ASCheetah5543–
Akkvir ASElephant4581–
Thaloran ASBeaver365–
Asker og Bærum Consult ASBeaver2724–
Move Forward ASElephant1471–
Rao ASBeaver50–
The sector in numbers

Summary · fiscal year 2022 · Morning class Micro

The sector's median operating margin is 4.4%. 12 of 55 companies have negative equity. The median equity ratio is 40.2%.

Companies with accounts55
Total revenue86 MNOK
Median operating margin4.4%
Median equity ratio40.2%
Share with a loss33%
Share with negative equity22%

All figures are for fiscal year 2022. Ranked: 12 operating companies. Holding companies, excluded companies and companies without enough data are shown but not ranked. How to read the index

Climbers and fallers · Morning class Micro

Change in rank from 2021 to 2022, for 2 companies ranked in both years.

Climbers

None.

Fallers

  1. 6Poort Consulting ASfrom rank 1 to 748
  2. 3Cim ASfrom rank 2 to 554

Awards · 2022 · Morning class Micro

Most profitableExecutive Decision Support AS52.4%
Fastest growthCim AS10.7%
Strongest balance sheetHollr AS100.0%
Largest revenueCim AS8 MNOK

Needs attention · 2022 · Morning class Micro

34 companies show at least one warning sign. Showing the 15 most important.

Sector map · 2022 · Morning class Micro

Profitability against solidity for the ranked companies. Size shows revenue. Coral triangle: negative equity. Click to open the company. Outliers are placed on the edge.

Show the map's figures as a table
CompanyOperating marginEquity ratioRevenue
Hollr AS34.3%100.0%2 MNOK
Ant AS−8.0%99.4%2 MNOK
Executive Decision Support AS52.4%65.2%2 MNOK
Akkvir AS−44.0%99.3%1 MNOK
Cim AS15.3%44.3%8 MNOK
Move Forward AS−11.3%79.2%1 MNOK
Poort Consulting AS28.2%19.2%1 MNOK
Dagh Consulting AS17.6%5.9%2 MNOK
Alvergruppen AS6.8%36.0%5 MNOK
Asker og Bærum Consult AS−1.2%11.6%4 MNOK
Thaloran AS2.0%0.7%2 MNOK
Rao AS−12.9%−2,231.2%2 MNOK

Holding and investment companies · 2022

4 companies in the sector are holding or investment companies. They are kept out of the ranking above, since revenue, margins and growth say little about a company that lives from ownership. They are ranked on their own here: 2 have at least 10 MNOK in assets and are listed.

Holding and investment companies
RankCompanyScore Equity ratioReturn on assetsCurrent ratioTotal assets
1Gks Holding AS100 73.1%61.9% 50.5415 MNOK
2Fiala Holding AS0 39.1%11.5% 0.3625 MNOK

Score 0–100 against the other holding companies in the sector: equity ratio 40 %, return on assets 40 % and current ratio 20 %. Methodology

In our articles

All articles

Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year

The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 7.4%.

Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported.

Fiscal yearMedian operating marginMedian equity ratio
2020––
202121.8%31.4%
2022 · weakest year7.4%34.5%
202310.1%40.2%
202410.3%38.5%
202510.0%38.4%
202614.1%55.8%

In 2022, 9 ranked companies did better than the sector, 4 about the same and 4 weaker.

Held up best in 2022

  1. 1Executive Decision Support ASequity ratio 65.2%52.4%
  2. 2Hollr ASequity ratio 100.0%34.3%
  3. 3Poort Consulting ASequity ratio 19.2%28.2%
  4. 4Dagh Consulting ASequity ratio 5.9%17.6%
  5. 5Cim ASequity ratio 44.3%15.3%
  6. 6Cuma Event ASequity ratio 8.2%13.0%
  7. 7Bearingpoint Norway ASequity ratio 34.5%10.1%
  8. 8Front Innovation ASequity ratio 5.8%9.8%
  9. 9Lighthouse Finance ASequity ratio 3.3%7.4%

Better than the sector: operating margin at or above the sector median and no loss or negative equity. Weaker: operating margin below the median and a loss or negative equity. Otherwise about the same as the sector. Methodology

Drivers in the sector

Interest rates, prices and exchange rates that shape the sector's year, next to the sector's median operating margin. The drivers are context and are not part of the index.

Consumer price index (indeks (2025 = 100))

Latest value: 104.0 (2026M09)

Consumer price index rose 3.0% in 2025; the sector's median operating margin fell 0.3 percentage points.

Consumer price index per year and the sector's median operating margin
Measure202120222023202420252026
Consumer price index, annual average84.389.294.197.0100.0102.9 (so far)
Change from the year before+3.5%+5.8%+5.5%+3.2%+3.0%+2.9%
Sector's median operating margin21.8%7.4%10.1%10.3%10.0%14.1%

Source: SSB (14710, CC BY 4.0). Source · fetched 4 November 2026

Policy rate (prosent)

Latest value: 4.50 (2026-10)

Policy rate fell 0.20 percentage points in 2025; the sector's median operating margin fell 0.3 percentage points.

Policy rate per year and the sector's median operating margin
Measure202120222023202420252026
Policy rate, annual average0.081.323.544.504.304.17 (so far)
Change from the year before−0.28 percentage points+1.24 percentage points+2.22 percentage points+0.96 percentage points−0.20 percentage points−0.12 percentage points
Sector's median operating margin21.8%7.4%10.1%10.3%10.0%14.1%

Source: Norges Bank (IR, NLOD 2.0). Source · fetched 4 November 2026

When policy rate fell in 2025, 820 of 1,613 ranked companies kept their operating margin at or above the year before. Among the largest: BDO AS (10.4% → 43.2%), Pricewaterhousecoopers AS (21.1% → 24.3%), ERNST & Young AS (1.8% → 2.3%), KPMG AS (13.4% → 13.9%), Wikborg Rein Advokatfirma AS (50.0% → 52.1%).

We show the drivers and the margin side by side and claim no cause. Sensitivity per company is not computed until we have at least 10 years of accounts per company: with three years such figures are false precision.

The sector in Norway (SSB)

The whole industry as Statistics Norway counts it: every enterprise, not only the limited companies we rank. Use these figures as background for the ranking above.

Enterprises, employment and turnover · 2024

Enterprises
27,548
+3.5% from 2023
Persons employed
76,475
+3.2% from 2023
Turnover
NOK 174.3 bn
+6.4% from 2023
Gross operating margin
4.9%
Gross operating surplus divided by turnover

All enterprises, sole proprietorships included.

Bankruptcies in the industry

102 enterprise bankruptcies in the last four quarters (2025K4–2026K3). Change −2.9% against the four quarters before (105). That is about 3.7 per 1,000 enterprises.

302024K4262025K1252025K2242025K3292025K4242026K1272026K2222026K3

Foreign-controlled enterprises · 2024

Share of enterprises
2.6%
Share of persons employed
19.6%
Share of turnover
25.9%

SSB publishes this for groups of industries only. The figures are for the group “Faglig, vitenskapelig og teknisk tjenesteyting”.

Turnover index · Juridisk og regnskapsmessig tjenesteyting

155.7 index, 2021 = 100, seasonally adjusted · 2026M08
+13.2% against 2025M08.

Monthly, 2023M08 to 2026M08.

Source: Statistics Norway (SSB), table 12910, table 10790, table 08085, table 13863. CC BY 4.0. Our industry codes (SN2025) are linked to SSB’s (SN2007) with SSB’s correspondence table in Klass.

Latest bankruptcies and liquidations

All bankruptcies and liquidations in the sector

Industry codes (NACE)

CodeDescription
69*Hele hovedgruppe 69
69.100Juridisk tjenesteyting
69.201Revisjon
69.202Regnskapsføring og bokføring
69.203Skatterådgivning
70*Hele hovedgruppe 70
70.200Bedriftsrådgivning og annen administrativ rådgivning