Lett-Tak Systemer AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
43of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 34 % of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Medium: 742 of 1,127 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,899 of 2,930 · Industri
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 12 and solidity 76 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Lett-Tak Systemer AS is 8 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 51 among 1,127 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −4.1% (median 4.7%) and equity ratio 56.4% (median 39.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 256 MNOK | 129 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −4.1% | 4.7% |
| Profit margin | −4.1% | 4.6% |
| Return on assets | −7.2% | 10.0% |
| Equity ratio | 56.4% | 39.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.77 | 1.50 |
| Current ratio | 1.65 | 1.53 |
| Revenue growth | 2.1% | 6.3% |
| Revenue per employee | 2.01 MNOK | 2.68 MNOK |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 43, Lett-Tak Systemer AS does better than 34% of companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector (1,127 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Lett-Tak Systemer AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector
Lett-Tak Systemer AS has a score of 43 for 2025, rank 1,899 of 2,930 in the sector.
Strongest: Solidity: percentile 76 against peers, equity ratio 56.4% against a median of 39.3%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 12 against peers, operating margin −4.1% against a median of 4.7%. Growth: percentile 38 against peers, revenue growth 2.1% against a median of 6.3%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −4.1% (median 4.6%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −4.1% (median 4.7%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
Lett-Tak Systemer AS had an operating margin of −4.1% and an equity ratio of 56.4% in 2025, and ranks 1,899 of 2,930 in Industri.
No large changes in the key figures from 2024 to 2025.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 71 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 71 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −4.1% (median 4.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −4.1% (median 4.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.5% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 0.0%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 12 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 76 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 56 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 38 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 44 | weight 15% |
Durability: 50 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Lett-Tak Systemer AS?
The operating margin was −4.1% in 2025, against a median of 4.7% among companies in the Morning class Medium in the same sector. Return on assets was −7.2%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Lett-Tak Systemer AS?
The equity ratio was 56.4% in 2025 (median 39.3%). Debt-to-equity was 0.77 (median 1.50).
What is the liquidity of Lett-Tak Systemer AS like?
The current ratio was 1.65 in 2025 (median 1.53).
How does Lett-Tak Systemer AS compare in Industri?
Lett-Tak Systemer AS ranks 1,899 of 2,930 in Industri for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Medium it is number 742 of 1,127. Revenue changed by 2.1% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 988782300
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Industri (25.110)
- Morning company class
- Medium
- Employees
- 127 registered 10 October 2026
- Founded
- 24 June 2005 21 years in operation
- Share capital
- 1.02 MNOK
- Business address
- Hegdalveien 139, 3261 LARVIK
- Municipality
- Larvik rank 4 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- LEI
- 549300GIWY8MI1TC1J77 renews 26 November 2027
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 31 October 2026. Only names are shown.
- Parent company
- Lundhs Labradoreksport A/S (Norway)
Source: GLEIF (Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation), fetched 30 October 2026. The parent is the one the company itself reported to GLEIF.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 31 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 68 | 39 | 43 | |
| Rank | 628 | 2,065 | 1,899 | |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | −5.4% | −4.1% | |
| Return on assets | 11.5% | −7.9% | −7.2% | |
| Equity ratio | 54.5% | 54.9% | 56.4% | |
| Current ratio | 1.94 | 1.69 | 1.65 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −13.8% | 2.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 290.6 MNOK | 250.5 MNOK | 255.6 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 15.2 MNOK | −13.5 MNOK | −10.6 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 17.6 MNOK | −11.6 MNOK | −10.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 13.8 MNOK | −9.1 MNOK | −8.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.8 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 161.1 MNOK | 143.4 MNOK | 126.2 MNOK |
| Current assets | 142.3 MNOK | 109.0 MNOK | 90.9 MNOK |
| Equity | 87.9 MNOK | 78.8 MNOK | 71.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 86.8 MNOK | 77.8 MNOK | 70.2 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 73.3 MNOK | 64.6 MNOK | 55.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 73.3 MNOK | 64.6 MNOK | 55.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 31 October 2026, accounts id 7222472.
Further
Similar companies
- Straumsheim Glass og Fasade AS index 43, rank 1,895 · compare
- Westcon Helgeland AS index 43, rank 1,897 · compare
- Nordic Door AS index 43, rank 1,900 · compare
- W B Samson AS index 43, rank 1,901 · compare
- Hoseth Technology AS index 43, rank 1,902 · compare